[RJCogburn]

Hanging my hat with the liberals and libertarians on this one.

[F.J. Mitchell]

As usual, I am with the Conservatives on this one. No pair of perverts, consenting adults or not, can confine the disease and filth, spawned by their deviency, to the privacy of their bedroom. They demand their right to privacy for the purpose of committing their fornication, but flee the bedroom demanding that everyone else pay for the treatment of their affliction, and finance the vain pursuit of vacination against it, so they may continue on with their mindless pursuit of banality.

They want our children indoctrinated by the education establishment, at such an early age that they are not even aware of normal human sexuality, into being aware of and receptive to homosexuality.

May the Supreme Court find the wisdom and guts to properly rule on this issue.

[gcruse]

Hah! You finally bit into an artery. Posted at 2 or 3 in the morning and still bopping along. There only thing more popular than digging into someone's sex life is defining that life for others using the tools of government.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Maybe there is an equal protection issue here. Why ban buggery done unto a man but not that done unto a woman? Is there anything more redeeming about the second act than the first? By failing to ban the second, Texas has unfortunately opened itself up to question on its ban of the first.

[A2J]

Libertarians Join Liberals

Nothing new here, especially considering that they're "kissing cousins."

[Wavyhill]

What exactly have libertarians gotten for supporting homosexuals' right to proselytize? Answer: a bunch of liberty-hating, anti-gun wannabe "pink fascists."