Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Short: I'll Be Vilified For This - But I Just Can't Walk Out Now
Independent (UK) ^ | 3-19-2003 | Marie Woolf

Posted on 03/18/2003 7:22:39 PM PST by blam

Short: I'll be vilified for this - but I just can't walk out now

By Marie Woolf, Chief Political Correspondent
19 March 2003

Clare Short's version of events goes like this: she was writing her resignation statement when suddenly she decided to stay in her job.

Having nearly completed the draft valediction, she thought: "We've got to look after the people in Iraq; we've got to drive forward the peace process to get the Palestinian state; we've got to make sure there's not a humanitarian disaster."

Resignation, the Secretary of State for International Development decided, would be "cheap" and "cowardly".

This account by Ms Short of why she was so spectacularly reneging on her public promise to quit the Cabinet over the Iraq crisis left her an isolated and humiliated figure yesterday.

Ministers and backbench Labour MPs – many of them anti-war – queued up to accuse her of self-interest and inconsistency. "She has done Tony Blair a service by staying, but she looks silly," said a senior government source.

Tam Dalyell, the MP for Linlithgow and the father of the House, said he was not "in the least surprised" by her decision to stay. "It's par for the course," he said. Other Labour rebels said she had lost her credibility and had made an "unprincipled decision".

Graham Allen, Labour MP for Nottingham North, who has orchestrated the backbench rebellion, could scarcely disguise his contempt. "I have NO comment to make about Clare Short," he said. Another MP called her a "busted flush".

The Westminster lobbies were not won round by a letter Ms Short had circulated to Labour MPs outlining her reasons for staying. She said she had been reassured that munitions such as cluster bombs and those made from depleted uranium would not rain down on the Iraqis. Few were convinced by her conversion to the cause of war. As she took her place on the front bench, Patricia Hewitt, the Trade and Industry Secretary, and Tessa Jowell, the Culture Secretary, looked deeply annoyed.

They had publicly criticised her open display of disloyalty to Tony Blair last week. While she had taken to the airwaves, other cabinet ministers with profound worries over the policy on Iraq had kept silent in the Government's interest.

In a series of interviews yesterday, Ms Short revealed that she was prepared for "a really hard time" if she did not resign. "I know that I will be vilified. It is easier to go. I would be more popular if I went, but the truth is I would be copping out," she told the BBC. She explained she had been convinced to stay and vote for military action because her concerns on government policy had been addressed. She said she still believed the "approach to the crisis could have been better handled earlier".

But she now wanted to play a part in orchestrating the humanitarian effort in Iraq. "The things I have complained about, there has been movement on." Ms Short said she had been reassured by two presentations by the military, which persuaded her the armed forces would be "enormously careful" to avoid unnecessary civilian suffering. She also felt reassured by the Attorney General's judgment that a war without a second UN resolution was legal.

Ms Short was now convinced the UN would be in charge of rebuilding Iraq after the bombing. The MP for Birmingham Ladywood revealed yesterday that she had offered to step down after she had accused the Prime Minister in a radio interview last week of pursuing a "reckless" policy and threatened to resign. "I offered my resignation after the 'reckless' remarks and he said no," she told the BBC. "He said to me yesterday, 'You can be a very awkward person but I want you to stay. We need you for this'. That is his view."

There was doubt whether the Cabinet would put up with another outburst from Ms Short. Even Gordon Brown, her most powerful ally, who has worked behind the scenes to get her to stay, may not be able to stop her becoming a reshuffle casualty.Ms Short appeared pessimistic about her long-term future in the Government. She told Channel 4 News that Mr Blair wanted her to "stay for the reconstruction of Iraq". She said: "I might well get booted out afterwards, that doesn't matter. I'm not in this for [my] career ... I'm trying to do what's right."

CLARE SHORT'S STATEMENT

"I have decided to support the Government in the vote today. Given my remarks last week, I believe I should explain my reasons.

"I know I will be heavily criticised for my decision and many people will fell I have let them down. But I am doing what I think is right in the circumstances we are in ...

"There have been a number of important developments over the last week. Firstly, the Attorney General has made clear that military action would be legal. Other lawyers have expressed contrary opinions but for the UK Government, the Civil Service and the military, it is the view of the Attorney General that matters.

"Second, the Prime Minister has persuaded President Bush that there must be a UN resolution on creating a UN mandate for the reconstruction of Iraq. This is crucial. Without it, coalition forces would have been an occupying army under international law ...

"Third, a UN resolution is to be tabled which will give Kofi Annan charge of the oil-for-food programme and lead to the lifting of sanctions ...

"Fourth, the road-map to Palestinian statehood by 2005 is to be published. This has been achieved by UK pressure ...

"I have until today been clear that I should leave the Government. I have now decided that this would be cowardly, because I would be offering no alternative way forward or making any contribution to resolving the problems ahead of us." 18 March 2003 21:20


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cant; out; short; vilified; walk

1 posted on 03/18/2003 7:22:40 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Is Blair going to give her the boot when the war is over?
2 posted on 03/18/2003 7:25:01 PM PST by smokeyjon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
So in other words she is a limely liberal?
3 posted on 03/18/2003 7:25:34 PM PST by try phecta tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Ah yes....another spineless liberal.

4 posted on 03/18/2003 7:25:48 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("When do I get to lift my leg on the liberal?...err...make that French")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Get rid of her. She is a security risk. Pull her clearances immediately.
5 posted on 03/18/2003 7:26:26 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
If she's influenced anyone else to resign, and they actually followed through with it, how do you suppose they feel right now?
6 posted on 03/18/2003 7:31:23 PM PST by solzhenitsyn ("Live Not By Lies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Winston Churchill changed from the Conservative Party to the Liberal Party.
Some years later he changed back to the Conservative Party.
He said "Anyone can rat, but it takes real talent to rerat".
Ms. Short obviously lacks talent.

So9

7 posted on 03/18/2003 7:33:46 PM PST by Servant of the Nine (JDAM the Arabs, Full Speed Ahead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
A conversation between Clare Short and Robin Cook:

CS: You quit.
RC: No you quit first.
CS:No you first.
RC:OK I quit. Now you quit.
RC: OK Clare you quit now, just like we planned.
RC: Rats.

8 posted on 03/18/2003 7:34:11 PM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Give her the royal flush, Tony, right down the loo.

Leni

9 posted on 03/18/2003 7:39:47 PM PST by MinuteGal (THIS JUST IN ! Astonishing fare reduction for FReeps Ahoy Cruise! Check it out, pronto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
We've got to look after the people in Iraq; we've got to drive forward the peace process to get the Palestinian state; we've got to make sure there's not a humanitarian disaster." While she was saying that she was probably thinking there’s no reason for this rat to jump in the water if the ship isn’t going to sink.
10 posted on 03/18/2003 7:40:36 PM PST by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Dog #1
One more time: there is no such thing as a Palestinian. They are ex-citizens of the 28 Arabic countries close to Israel. These are people kept in tent cities for generations under poor conditions purposely by their slimy masters. Yasser and his associates enjoy all the perks of the high life while their constituants muck about on the world's welfare conspiring that handout's destruction. While the majority of "Palestinians" labor under the illusion that they could staff a country their leadership has no intention of seeing that happen.
Until W. called them on it.
11 posted on 03/18/2003 9:51:12 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus (Gun control means hitting your target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
Any relation to Alec Baldwin? I think it is despicable the way these people raise our hopes with wonderful promises and then renege. Further demonstration of the Great Liberal Tradition, modelled so well by Slick Willie, Little Tommy, Jacques: "You can't hold me to my word. My words mean nothing. They are only for effect."
12 posted on 03/18/2003 10:22:48 PM PST by Nevermore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus
I hope you realize I wasn't endorsing her views. I was mocking her sincerity. No doubt many profit from maintaining these people in a perpetual state of perceived victimhood. It's amazing all the other Arab counties are ready to fight Israel to the "death" about the Palestinian issue but none would dream of giving them a permanent home. I think the Israelis would have been happy to cut loose the “Palestine Enclaves” already if they hadn’t been turned into terrorist staging zones. In the end it’s impossible to have a reasonable peaceful solution with unreasonable unpeaceful people.
13 posted on 03/18/2003 10:59:20 PM PST by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson