Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmishDude
To be honest, I've never been impressed with linguistics in the first place

Your ignorance is showing. I think it was Peggy Noonan who pointed out that the difference between liberals and conservatives is not the difference between liberal ideas and conservative ideas, but rather the difference between avoiding ideas or arguing about them. By being on the other swing of the liberal hinge you are avoiding ideas.

Linguistics is a sound rigorouse and valuable field of study.

17 posted on 03/15/2003 5:32:32 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson
re: Linguistics is a sound rigorouse and valuable field of study. )))

Yeah, and we definitely need more study of grammar!

The linguists' chief claim to fame is the discovery that the Gypsies were of Indic (Sanscrit) origin. Before that, their origins were a mystery.

And it looks like transformational grammar may be helpful in developing, or at least analyzing, computer language.

Other than that, it's an interesting but not terribly important field. No social science can really call itself "rigorous"...

18 posted on 03/15/2003 5:37:14 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: AndyJackson
Your ignorance is showing.

Linguistics is a sound rigorouse and valuable field of study.

Ah, sweet, sweet irony.

It may be rigorous(e), it may be valuable. So is wiring a house for electricity. The fundamental question is, "Is it intellectually challeging?" Or, equivalently, "What kind of mathematics is involved?"

53 posted on 03/15/2003 7:34:10 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson