Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diddley
And nothing in the report that would prohibit Iraq from continuing to build up a masive conventional force while we just sorta commit to being passive onlookers as long as inspecoters inspect. That would be fine til Iraq decided to just let loose.
3 posted on 03/14/2003 11:52:21 PM PST by bart99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bart99
And nothing in the report that would prohibit Iraq from continuing to build up a masive conventional force while we just sorta commit to being passive onlookers as long as inspecoters inspect.

And, what people seem to miss by concentrating on inspections and disarmament is that there's nothing in an inspections regime to stop Iraq from funding terrorism, or providing bases and training for terrorists. The only way to stop that is through regime change.

Iraq is a nation that harbors terrorists and pays terrorists. The US must act to protect its interests, since we have seen the result of allowing terrorists to flourish. It's not about WMD. It's not about UN resolutions. It's the terrorism, stupid.

Of course, getting WMDs out of Saddam's hands is also a worthy goal, though not sufficient in and of itself (Yes, I know that I'm beginning to ramble...)

10 posted on 03/15/2003 12:06:40 AM PST by EvilOverlord (Body armor goes well with ANY outfit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson