[stanz]

What I want to know, Mr. Morality, is how the term "murder" came to be discussed in relation to my post? You injected the word "murder". Why? My post, go back and read it, lays out points for defining political conservatism. What are you reading? I am talking about conservatism defined on the basis of fiscal factors. So stop putting words in my mouth and misconstruing my intent.
If there'as anyone who would profit from thinking, it's you.

[Dataman]

What I want to know, Mr. Morality, is how the term "murder" came to be discussed in relation to my post?

I explained it once and you didn't get it. I'm not sure explaining it twice would help. Regardless, this is an excellent quote from the article:

"It is time for defenders of Darwin to engage in serious dialogue and debate with their scientific critics," said Jed Macosko, a research molecular biologist at the University of California, Berkeley. "Science can’t grow where institutional gatekeepers try to prevent new challengers from being heard."