Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia Says It's Prepared To Use Veto Power
CTV ^

Posted on 03/04/2003 8:04:34 AM PST by RCW2001

Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said Tuesday that Moscow is prepared to use its veto power in the UN Security Council to ensure that war is not waged on Iraq.

"Russia would not support any decision that would directly or indirectly lead to a war with Iraq," Ivanov said, according to a translated version of an answer during a BBC World Service question and answer session in London.

"Only unanimity will provide success in the solution of the Iraqi problem," he said. "All the time we look for solutions that will allow for joint action."

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, speaking to reporters at the UN headquarters in New York, also warned that a divided vote on a U.S.-backed resolution would damage the credibility of the council.

"I tend to believe that if the council managed to come together and resolve the crisis...the credibility and the influence of the council would be enhanced," Annan said, adding a divided vote would diminish the council's power.

"I think this is a critically important stage for the United Nations," Annan said. "Whenever we've discussed issues of war and peace, it is something that has consumed all of us.

"We should only consider it when all possibilities of a peaceful solution have been exhausted."

The Security Council remains divided over a U.S.-British-Spanish resolution that paves the way for war with Iraq and a Franco-German plan calling for four more months of inspections.

Canada, while not a member of the UN Security Council, is trying to help broker a compromise plan that calls on Iraqi President Saddam Hussein to disarm by March 28 or face war.

The Canadian proposal has received some interest from the 10 elected members of the Security Council, but the permanent members with veto power have already dismissed it.

The U.S. and Britain say the proposal isn't tough enough. France doesn't like the plan either, concerned that it could set a firm timetable for military action against Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. The two other permanent members, Russia and China, tend to favour the French position.

A vote on the U.S.-backed resolution is expected to come shortly after chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix delivers his latest progress report to the Security Council on March 7.

In order to pass, it would need the support of nine of the 15 members of the Security Council, and no vetos from the permanent members.

"I think the council's decision will be based on the totality of the presentation by the inspectors," Annan told reporters. "The council has the right to declare a further military breach at any time based on the reports of the inspectors."

In other developments Tuesday:

Turkey's government said it was considering having a second vote on a U.S. request to position more than 60,000 troops at Ankara bases in preparation for a possible attack on Iraq. The motion was narrowly rejected by Turkey over the weekend. The United States has ordered 60,000 additional troops to deploy to the Gulf. That's in addition to more than 250,000 U.S. and British troops already poised in the Gulf region, along with dozens of warships and hundreds of attack aircraft. Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi of Iran called for a UN-supervised referendum regarding a power transition in Iraq to avert war. Hussein has rejected any proposal to go into exile or give up power. With a report from Reuters and The Associated Press


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Russia
KEYWORDS: warlist

1 posted on 03/04/2003 8:04:34 AM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Does this mean we can skip the formalities and go right on to bombing???
2 posted on 03/04/2003 8:06:30 AM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
So who does Russia see as the Class Enemy; the US or Israel?
3 posted on 03/04/2003 8:07:18 AM PST by steveegg (The Surgeon General has determined that siding with Al-Qaeda is hazardous to your continued rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said Tuesday that Moscow is prepared to use its veto power in the UN Security Council to ensure that war is not waged on Iraq.

Taking the keys out of the F-16s' ignition is the only way now, comrade. Care to try?

4 posted on 03/04/2003 8:09:44 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
veto power in the UN Security Council to ensure that war is not waged on Iraq.

Sorry pal, your veto will have nothing to do whether war is waged or not.

5 posted on 03/04/2003 8:14:00 AM PST by KansasConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasConservative
Just Like they told Clinton on Serbia and he bombed away
6 posted on 03/04/2003 8:15:25 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
We should hold back support for the Russians in Chechnya. What comes around goes around. Foreign Minister Ivanov would well to remember before doing something his country will regret because one way or another Iraq will be disarmed with or without the UN's blessing.
7 posted on 03/04/2003 8:18:51 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Time to give up on the UN. Send an undersecretary of State to attend all Security Council meetings instead of the Secretary of State, have him veto any and all resolutions regarding anything that any other nation proposes, and demand that UN headquarters remove itself from United States territory forthwith (presumably, and appropriately, to Geneva). The UN will then whither away, the US will not have to worry about what Guineau or France or Syria thinks about its foreign policy, and the world, through United States peacekeeping operations, will become a safer and saner place.
8 posted on 03/04/2003 8:38:58 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
those Commies

oh well looks like those oil contracts won't survive after all
9 posted on 03/04/2003 8:42:04 AM PST by yankeedeerslayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
So?
10 posted on 03/04/2003 8:48:00 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
George better regroup regarding pooti-oo.
11 posted on 03/04/2003 8:52:51 AM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *war_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
12 posted on 03/04/2003 8:53:23 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
When Khruschev said "nyet," he meant "nyet." Putin, on the other hand . . . . even if he really meant "nyet," I just can't take him seriously.

Let him deal with Chechenya, and we'll deal with Saddam.
13 posted on 03/04/2003 9:01:45 AM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Putin, on the other hand . . . . even if he really meant "nyet," I just can't take him seriously.

does he have to give back that ranger belt buckle Bush gave him
14 posted on 03/04/2003 9:17:16 AM PST by uncbob ( building tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
All the Veto says is that we will be more careful of who we do business with in the coming future....doesnt mean its going to stop the war.
15 posted on 03/04/2003 10:00:26 AM PST by Enemy Of The State (To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said Tuesday that Moscow is prepared to use its veto power in the UN Security Council to ensure that war is not waged on Iraq

Nah, the ball is rolling, just daring you or France to veto it.

Honestly, the second one of those countries veto's the resolution, the US representitives should get there stuff and just walk out and never come back. And than expell them from our shores.

16 posted on 03/04/2003 10:53:42 AM PST by Blue Scourge (If the Son has set you free, than you are Free indeed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson