Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fuji surpasses 6 megapixels
CNET News ^ | February 19, 2003, 10:01 AM PT | Sandeep Junnarkar

Posted on 02/19/2003 11:25:38 AM PST by Bush2000

Fuji surpasses 6 megapixels

By Sandeep Junnarkar
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
February 19, 2003, 10:01 AM PT

update Fuji Photo Film on Wednesday unveiled two high-resolution digital cameras built around new sensor chips that are designed to capture more precise variations of light and dark. The new Fujifilm FinePix F700 offers a resolution of 6.2 megapixels using Fuji's new proprietary chip called the Super CCD SR, or charge-coupled device with super dynamic range technology. This chip, introduced in January, mixes a regular pixel sensor with a new type modified to capture high-intensity light. Fuji said that as a result, the chip can better capture the spectrum of light and dark elements in an image.

The camera will be available in the spring for $599.

The SR sensor offers 3.1 million so-called large pixels, dubbed "S," with high sensitivity to light, and 3.1 million smaller pixels, called "R," with low sensitivity to light, resulting in a range four times that of previous Super CCDs, according to Fuji.

Many high-end consumer digital cameras hover in the range of 3 megapixels or 4 megapixels.

Fuji also introduced the FinePix F410 which uses a CCD HR (high resolution) sensor chip. This sensor uses 3.1 million effective pixels and can produce high-resolution images with up to 6 million recorded pixels.

The FinePix will be available in April 2003 for about $499.99.

The new camera provides fodder to the raging debate among camera enthusiasts about which technology--CCD or CMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductors)--offers better quality. CCD sensors appear in most consumer-level cameras today, but some chipmakers are counting on the smaller size and lower power consumption of CMOS to spur adoption.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Technical
KEYWORDS: camera; ccd; cmos; fuji; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2003 11:25:38 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Oh great! Something else for my hubby to whine about!

- "Hooonnneeeyy...how come we (It's always "we", ever notice that,ladies?)can't get...."

- "One of the guys at work got a new computer and it's got ______________, and our's only has___________. That's why our computer doesn't _________"

- "Well, I guess I could try and install a new ______. (heavy sigh). If it's possible. But even if I can't I guess I can get by with _______ "(hang-dog expression)

- "If we had ________ in/for/on the computer, the ___________ would ________ better. Wouldn't that be great?"

- "You know what I'd really like to get (someday/for my birthday/ with our tax refund/ when they go on sale/whatever) is a _________________"

2 posted on 02/19/2003 11:38:38 AM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it, but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Oh, c'mon. We can't help it: Our biology is hardwired to favor toys...
3 posted on 02/19/2003 11:41:21 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
The Nikon D100 is 6.1 Megapixels and was available last year. Sorry Fuji.
4 posted on 02/19/2003 11:43:07 AM PST by Keeper of the Turf (Fore!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I believe I once heard that 6 megapixels would be equivalent to standard film cameras. Now that we've achieved it, does anyone know if it's still considered equivalent? Or is that a moving target? Nah, eight megapixels is what you need. Oh, ya got 8? Well, if you had twelve megapixels it would look just like the real thing.
5 posted on 02/19/2003 11:43:18 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Well, if you had twelve megapixels it would look just like the real thing.

Yeah, but when you hit FIFTEEN MEGAPIXELS, the hidden spirits that we've never been able to see before will start to show up in our photos....;)

6 posted on 02/19/2003 12:03:12 PM PST by ImaGraftedBranch (Education starts in the home. Education stops in the public schools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I bought a new motherboard, processor and modem because my wife complained about the speed of my computer. That'll learn her to shut her trap.
7 posted on 02/19/2003 12:06:39 PM PST by AppyPappy (Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Your response "Honey, _________ next door has a really big _________ and his wife just loves it. Why can't you get a really big __________ ?"
8 posted on 02/19/2003 12:10:00 PM PST by AppyPappy (Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
That'll learn her to shut her trap.

Alas, that particular feature is destined to be perpetual vaporware.

9 posted on 02/19/2003 12:11:50 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I believe I once heard that 6 megapixels would be equivalent to standard film cameras.

Good question, also do they print at that quality level?

10 posted on 02/19/2003 12:12:33 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Go here to find out more than you ever knew existed about digital photography.

http://www.dpreview.com/
11 posted on 02/19/2003 12:15:53 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
lol

You have been listening to our conversations!!!
Unfortunately, he usually pulls the old "It's for the business" routine to get me to give in.
12 posted on 02/19/2003 12:16:56 PM PST by Grammy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Keeper of the Turf
I waiting for Nikon to put out a digital camera for under a $1000 that will use all my Nikon lenses.
13 posted on 02/19/2003 12:19:05 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mercy; All
Be sure to check out the Canon EOS-1Ds at that site. 11 megapixel, full-frame CMOS sensor, up to 1250 ISO equivalent. If I had 8 grand burning a hole in my pocket, I'd buy one today. But I don't.
14 posted on 02/19/2003 12:33:34 PM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I believe I once heard that 6 megapixels would be equivalent to standard film cameras. Now that we've achieved it, does anyone know if it's still considered equivalent? Or is that a moving target? Nah, eight megapixels is what you need. Oh, ya got 8? Well, if you had twelve megapixels it would look just like the real thing.

I beleive that 6 megapixels meets or exceeds the grain texture of 35 mm. film. Larger film formats (which are generally used by professionals) have a larger digital equivalent, of course.

That said, for 5X7" or smaller prints, 3 megapixels should do the trick. If you want 10X8" prints, a 6 megapixel will do for top quality. If the picture is to be viewed from a few feet or more, a larger 15X10" print at 200 ppi can be made from a 6 meg camera. I've got a nifty chart from Popular Photography and Imaging magazine in front of me. They say that the human eye cannot resolve beyond 300 pixels-per-inch. Note that pixels-per-inch aren't the same as dots-per-inch.

I beleive that Canon has an 11.1 meg camera body, the EOS-1Ds with a 36X24 mm. CMOS light sensing device. It is compatable with all Canon's latest lenses that are used on their 35 mm. cameras. Unfortunately, the camera costs several thousand dollars. Give it 2 years - there will be some inexpensive, fine quality digital bodies that are fully compatible with today's lenses from all major manufacturers. I'm anxious for that time!

15 posted on 02/19/2003 12:34:03 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mercy
"http://www.dpreview.com/"

Good site! Been lookin' around there myself.

16 posted on 02/19/2003 12:35:38 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
You are too quick! I hadn't scrolled far enough before mentioning the EOS-1Ds. I want it but not yet - too much money.
17 posted on 02/19/2003 12:36:42 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Excellent answer! Thanks so much!
18 posted on 02/19/2003 12:37:02 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
You may not have to wait too long, the 6MP Nikon D100 goes for under $2000.
19 posted on 02/19/2003 12:37:18 PM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: meyer
'Way too friggin' much money. Its successor will probably be within my price range in less than five years. Meantime, I can make do with an Olympus C5050.
20 posted on 02/19/2003 12:38:37 PM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson