Skip to comments.
Breaking: Greta and Foxnews say White Powder found at ABCNEWS....
Posted on 02/10/2003 7:03:13 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-251 last
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
I would rather make cocaine legal and Bill Clinton illegal.
To: 3catsanadog
Ureka, it is finally become clear, the reason Bill Clinton was so corrupt is he was trolling for Deep Throat
To: U S Army EOD
"I would rather make cocaine legal and Bill Clinton illegal."
Bill Clinton is living proof of how dangerous cocain is to our society. I would not have thought that before him. I've tended to be pretty libertarian when it comes to drug laws. But now I'm seeing that offering the choice of slavery is not really offering a choice that any freedom loving person would ever choose. Cocain=clintonian slavery.
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Bill Clinton is a reflection of what our society has become. We really need to get our act together. Judging by his ability to be elected the second time, society didn't excuse his actions, they accepted them. That is really scary to me. Personally I rarely drink and and never used any type of substance.
Its just when I see Bill Clinton, I have a hard time being serious about anything, he is such a joke. But on the serious part, I wonder if our society will ever really go back to the right. The muslums talk about what a bunch of infidels we are, but if Bill Clinton and company is America, they may have a point. Sad, isn't it.
To: The Great Satan
To: U S Army EOD
but if Bill Clinton and company is America They represent a segment of America. That segment ignores traditional morals. If they actually lived their lives morally based, they would have demanded that Bill Clinton step down to avoid the Impeachment trial. Much like Nixon did. As a result, Al Gore would have used his power as president to gain the few extra votes he needed to beat George Bush. So in the end, their lack of morals, led to their detriment. Thats why conservative and traditional values will win out in the long run. They have stood the test of time.
To: prairiebreeze
She said he was lying because the strain that was used in the US anthrax attacks was proven to have been made in the US and so that proves Colin was lying Someday someone will explain to her the difference between initially developing a bacterial strain and being the one who mass produces a specific quantity of it later on.
To: The Great Satan
Everybody knows... After reading through the massive amount of new articles today concerning anthrax, terror attacks, Bin Laden Audio, Iraq Al Queda Connection, etc, etc.. You are probably right, now. Heck, I even saw a video showing tanks being deployed at Heathrow Airport in London. The talking head called them tanks but they actually looked like APC.
To: ohioman
You remind me of, and sound like, Karem Abdul Jabbar on Steven King's The Stand. Actually, the lines are from Leonard Cohen.
249
posted on
02/12/2003 1:43:18 AM PST
by
The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
To: justa-hairyape
I wish I wasn't right. I wish this would all just go away. But it won't, I'm afraid. Facts are stubborn things. They can't be wished away. Not every cloud has a silver lining, it isn't always darkest before the dawn, and sometimes that light at the end of the tunnel is the searchlight of an oncoming express train.
250
posted on
02/12/2003 1:46:13 AM PST
by
The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
To: The Great Satan
But we are faced with four possibilities.
#1 - We attack Iraq and Saddam discovers that his anthrax detterent was no longer functional. (best case scenario, saddam is gone)
#2 - We attack Iraq and Saddam delivers his anthrax attack detterent. Thousands die within the US. (very bad for us, but in the end Saddam is gone)
#3 - We attack Iraq and Saddam counter attacks our troops with WMD. (we loose lots of military, but in the end Saddam is gone)
#4 - We dont attack Iraq, but Saddam's anthrax counterattack is delivered anyway by 'Al Queda operatives'. (absolute worse case scenario)(US cannot retaliate with WMD because Al Queda is in numerous countries)
If you look at these scenarios, there is one that is clearly the worse case. How can we actually trust Saddam in any kind of alternative comprimise scenario ?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-251 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson