Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/30/2003 9:43:59 AM PST by Undecided
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Undecided
If Hussein really is a threat to us in the future, a terrorist waiting to happen, then wait for it to happen.

Brilliant. I'll pass on the brainless fatalism, thanks.

2 posted on 01/30/2003 9:46:34 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
See jaynadavis.com
3 posted on 01/30/2003 9:47:29 AM PST by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
Comparing Ruby Ridge to the situation is the Gulf is so riduculous that words fail me.
4 posted on 01/30/2003 9:47:51 AM PST by SandfleaCSC (Yes, I'm bad, but you all knew that anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
Sadam is an asset poor Adolf Hitler. How long do you want to let him build up assets?
5 posted on 01/30/2003 9:47:58 AM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
I wonder if you represent the majority of libertarians. How did you feel about W's anti drug stand Tuesday?
6 posted on 01/30/2003 9:48:56 AM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
If Hussein really is a threat to us in the future, a terrorist waiting to happen, then wait for it to happen.

Are you willing to risk the lives of millions within the US and elsewhere around the world on that statement? Are you willling to risk your family's lives? Are you willing to risk this country on that statement?

Or are you one of those who sits back after the fact and wrings his hands, complaining about how we knew and didn't do anything? Make up your mind.

We're in this thing too far now. I'd much rather deal with disarming a pre-nuclear Saddam before going after Kim, than to wait until we have two rogue nuclear states in different parts of the world ready and willing to blow up Kansas City or Indianapolis or Pittsburgh or Des Moines or Sacramento on a moment's notice; to say nothing of the terrorists and Al Qaeda wannabes across the globe.

The sand is over there in the corner. You are welcome to hide your head in it.

7 posted on 01/30/2003 9:49:21 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
More libertarian drivel from a driveling libertarian!
8 posted on 01/30/2003 9:51:21 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
And here is an unknown author's take on the liberal and conservative stand (joke):

Subject: The Liberal and Conservative

The Difference Between The Liberal and Conservative "Debate" Over The
War On Terrorism:

Question: You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and
daughter. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge knife comes
around the corner and is running at you. In your hand is a Glock.40 and
you are an expert shot. What do you do?

Liberal Answer:

Well, that's not enough information to answer the question! Does the man
look poor or oppressed? Have I ever done anything to him that is
inspiring him to attack? Could we run away? What does my wife think?
What about the kids? Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and
knock the knife out of his hand? What does the law say about this
situation? This is all so confusing! I need to debate this with some
friends for a few days to try to come to a conclusion.

Conservative Answer:

BANG!

Texan's Answer:

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click...
(sounds of clip being ejected and fresh clip installed)

Wife: "Sweetheart, he looks like he's still moving."

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!

Daughter: "Nice grouping Daddy!"
9 posted on 01/30/2003 9:51:23 AM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
"If Hussein really is a threat to us in the future, a terrorist waiting to happen, then wait for it to happen."

Why do I intuit that you would be the first to blame the government for not preventing an attack?

Why do I sense that you would critize the US government for striking back?

11 posted on 01/30/2003 9:52:16 AM PST by NetValue (Orwell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
Listen, I live in Idaho and remember Ruby Ridge quite well. However, Weaver never shot at his neighbors nor killed members of his own family. AND Weaver never supported terrorism or PAID suicide bombers for killing innocent Israelis, women and children to name a few. I do not support what our government did at Ruby Ridge. However those with your attitude actually support the polices of Saddam Hussein and his despicible regime. 'Nuf said.
15 posted on 01/30/2003 9:54:24 AM PST by abnegation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
Thank you for your comment Mr. Sheen, we'll call when we are ready for you on the set.
17 posted on 01/30/2003 9:57:19 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
Here's one for you libertarians. Read about the increased spending by the Republican Congress. See this article by Jane Chastain. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30766
18 posted on 01/30/2003 10:00:20 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
Puhleeeeeesssse!!

This is a comparison of Ruby Ridge and going after Sadaam ...??

How ignorant can you be ...??
19 posted on 01/30/2003 10:00:41 AM PST by CyberAnt ( Syracuse where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
I'm getting so sick and tired of hearing the "lets wait until he does something" rant from a bunch of idiots who will be the first ones to say "how could we have let this happen" when the sh!t finally does hit the fan.

Knock-em Sock-em now.
21 posted on 01/30/2003 10:01:07 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option......"

"We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes peace must be defended. A future lived at the mercy of terrible threats is no peace at all. If war is forced upon us, we will fight in a just cause and by just means -- sparing, in every way we can, the innocent. And if war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military -- and we will prevail."

I consider myself a libertarian (small "l"), and not a huge fan of GWB, but the above quotes from his SOTU I agree with, and I believe, bear repeating.

26 posted on 01/30/2003 10:10:33 AM PST by deaconblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
You want tangible evidence? Then here you go...

"We do have solid evidence of the presence in Iraq of al Qaeda members, including some that have been in Baghdad," the defense secretary said. "We have what we consider to be credible contacts in Iraq who could help them acquire weapons of mass destruction capabilities." Mr. Rumsfeld's presentation at a Pentagon news conference came the day after White House National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice disclosed for the first time an intelligence report that said Iraq helped train al Qaeda members to use chemical weapons. Her words were reiterated yesterday by White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer. "Al Qaeda and Iraq are too close for comfort," he said.

Al Qaeda linked to Saddam

Other links to check out:

Rice: Iraq Providing Shelter, Chemical Weapons Help to Al Qaeda

Ansar Al-Isam: Iraq’s Al-Qaeda Connection

Salman Pak: Iraq's Smoking Gun Link to 9-11?

PBS - Info on Salman Pak

Saddam killed Abu Nidal over al-Qa'eda row

New evidence links Saddam, bin Laden

Arafat-Saddam-Bin Laden Links Surface

Saddam and Osama: A Long History

Saddam 'sends troops to help bin Laden men'

Iraqi Funds, Training Fuel Islamic Terror Group

Alert by Saddam points to Iraq - 23 Sep 2001 Article

Mounting Evidence of Iraqi Link to Terror Attacks

Iraqi defector tells of terrorist training camp

Will Iraq be the Next Target?

Another item of extreme interest with loads of info on connections:

Ashton, et al. v. al Qaeda, et al.: Complaint (PDF) Lawsuit claiming a 9/11 link between Iraq and al Qaeda. Sept. 3, 2002

Some excerpts for you...

Some excerpts:

39. Upon information and belief, there have been numerous meetings between IRAQI Intelligence agents and high-ranking AL QAEDA terrorists to plan terror attacks. Once such meeting occurred in 1992, when ZAWAHIRI (EGYPTIAN ISLAMIC JIHAD leader and AL QAEDA officer) met with IRAQI INTELLIGENCE agents in Baghdad, IRAQ over several days. An IRAQI serving with the TALIBAN who fled Afghanistan in the fall of 2001, was captured in Kurdistan and has corroborated this meeting and confirmed that IRAQI contacts with AL QAEDA began in 1992.

During the early 1990s, Sudan’s Sheikh Hassan al-Tourabi of the Islamic National Front arranged meetings between BIN-LADEN and IRAQI INTELLIGENCE officials. BIN LADEN met with FARUQ AL-HIJAZI, an IRAQI INTELLIGENCE agent in the Sudan who would later head IRAQI INTELLIGENCE for SADDAM HUSSEIN. BIN LADEN again met with IRAQI INTELLIGENCE officers in 1994 and 1995 in the Sudan. At these meetings, BIN-LADEN and IRAQI INTELLIGENCE secret service director FARUQ AL-HIJAZI agreed to work together on terrorist projects directed against the U.S.

55. From 1996 until 2001, BIN LADEN with the financial and logistical support of OMAR and others in the TALIBAN and IRAQ and IRAQI INTELLIGENCE, created, supplied and operated at least five training camps in order to create an “Islamic Foreign Legion” capable of attacking their enemies throughout the world. These camps trained men from 15 nations in guerrilla warfare, terrorist activities, rocket warfare, demolition and bombing, including the use of mines, grenades, TNT, nitroglycerine and plastic explosives. Classes were also given in “how to kill a policeman” and “traps, murder and terrorist moves.”

57. In February 1997, BIN LADEN publicly expressed his support for IRAQ in its conflict with the United States stating:

“The hearts of the Muslims are filled with hatred towards the United States of America and the American president for American conduct towards IRAQ.”
59. IRAQ upon information and belief, agreed to supply arms to AL QAEDA and provide AL QAEDA with access to and training in the use of chemical and biological weapons and agreed to instruct AL QAEDA terror trainers at its Salman Pak camp in Baghdad that contained a Boeing 707 used to practice hijacking. IRAQ also agreed to supply AL QAEDA terrorists with new identities and passports from Yemen and the United Arab Emirates.

60. AL QAEDA agreed to provide protection from political opponents to IRAQ and SADDAM HUSSEIN, and to commit assassinations and other acts of violence to create instability in regions of IRAQ, particularly Kurdistan, to assist the regime of SADDAM HUSSEIN. AL QAEDA further agreed to provide trained terrorists, assassins and martyrs to carry out terror attacks in concert with IRAQ against their common enemies, including the United States.

64. Between April 25 and May 1, 1998, two of BIN LADEN’s senior military commanders, MUHAMMAD ABU-ISLAM and ABDULLAH QASSIM, visited Baghdad for discussions with SADDAM HUSSEIN’s son -- QUSAY HUSSEIN -- the “czar” of IRAQI INTELLIGENCE.

65. QUSAY HUSSEIN’s participation in those meetings highlights the importance of the talks in both symbolic and practical terms. Upon information and belief, as a direct result of these meetings, IRAQ again made commitments to provide training, intelligence, clandestine Saudi border crossings, financial support and weapons and explosives to AL QAEDA.

66. IRAQI INTELLIGENCE officials met with BIN LADEN in Afghanistan several more times. A second group of BIN LADEN and AL QAEDA operatives from Saudi Arabia were then trained by IRAQI INTELLIGENCE in IRAQ to smuggle weapons and explosives into Saudi Arabia and other countries, which they later accomplished in an effort to carry out future terrorist acts of violence. A third group of BIN LADEN and AL QAEDA operatives received a month of sophisticated guerrilla operations training from IRAQI INTELLIGENCE officials later in the Summer of 1998.

67. Despite philosophical and religious differences with SADDAM HUSSEIN, BIN LADEN continually sought to strengthen and reinforce the support he and AL QAEDA received from IRAQ. In mid-July 1998, BIN LADEN sent Dr. AYMAN AL-ZAWAHIRI, the Egyptian co-founder of AL QAEDA, to IRAQ to meet with senior Iraqi officials, including Iraqi vice president TAHA YASSIN RAMADAN. Upon information and belief, the purpose of this meeting was to discuss and plan a joint strategy for a terrorist campaign against the United States.

69. During the July 1998 visit ZAWAHIRI toured an IRAQI military base and nuclear and chemical weapons facility near al-Fallujah in IRAQ and upon information and belief, observed training by IRAQI INTELLIGENCE officials of AL QAEDA operatives at the al-Nasiriyah military and chemical weapons facility in IRAQ.

79. Following the December 1998 air strikes on IRAQ, SADDAM HUSSEIN dispatched FARUQ AL-HIJAZI to Kandahar, Afghanistan in order to meet with BIN LADEN and plot their revenge.

81. To demonstrate IRAQ’s commitment to BIN LADEN and AL QAEDA, HIJAZI presented BIN LADEN with a pack of blank, official Yemeni passports, supplied to IRAQI INTELLIGENCE from their Yemeni contacts. HIJAZI’s visit to Kandahar was followed by a contingent of IRAQI INTELLIGENCE officials who provided additional training and instruction to BIN LADEN and AL QAEDA operatives in Afghanistan. These Iraqi officials included members of “Unit 999,” a group of elite IRAQI INTELLIGENCE officials who provided advanced sabotage and infiltration training and instruction to AL QAEDA operatives.

82. At that meeting, upon information and belief, BIN LADEN, AL QAEDA and IRAQ agreed to join efforts in a detailed, coordinated plan for a protracted terrorist war against the United States.

84. IRAQ maintains an advanced chemical and biological weapons program and is one of only three countries in the world producing a highly developed weaponized anthrax. Some time during or after 1998, IRAQ agreed to help BIN LADEN and AL QAEDA develop a laboratory in Afghanistan designed to produce anthrax.

85. In addition to the al-Nasiriyah and Salman Pak training camps, by January 1999, BIN LADEN and AL QAEDA operatives were being trained by IRAQI INTELLIGENCE and military officers at other training camps on the outskirts of Baghdad.

86. In January 1999, IRAQ began reorganizing and mobilizing IRAQI INTELLIGENCE front operations throughout Europe in support of BIN LADEN and AL QAEDA. HAQI ISMAIL, believed to be a member of the IRAQ’S MUKHABARAT Secret Service, left IRAQ to train in an Afghanistan AL QAEDA camp. ISMAIL was believed to be a liason between IRAQ, the TALIBAN and AL QAEDA and was rewarded with a position in the TALIBAN Foreign Ministry.

103. On July 21, approximately six weeks before the September 11 th attacks, IRAQI columnist Mulhalhal reported that BIN LADEN was making plans to “demolish the Pentagon after he destroys the White House.”

104. Mulhalhal’s July 21 article further informed that BIN LADEN would strike America “on the arm that is already hurting.” Upon information and belief, this references a second IRAQI sponsored attack on the World Trade Center. This interpretation is further bolstered by another reference to New York as “[BIN LADEN] will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra everytime he hears his songs.” (e.g., “New York, New York”) identifying New York, New York as a target.

105. Mulhalhal further indicated, “The wings of a dove and the bullet are all but one and the same in the heart of a believer.” (Emphasis supplied) This appears to be a reference to the use of commercial aircraft as a weapon. The information was reported in an IRAQI newspaper who’s editor-in-chief serves as secretary to UDAY HUSSEIN’S Iraqi Syndicate of Journalists. The article expressed IRAQI admiration and support for BIN LADEN’s plans and its appearance in the newspaper would clearly have to be endorsed by SADDAM HUSSEIN himself.

106. All IRAQI news media is strictly controlled and censored by the government of SADDAM HUSSEIN and is under the direct oversight of UDAY HUSSEIN. Various members of IRAQI intelligence work at and control the content of each and every newspaper published inside IRAQ.

107. The information contained in Mulhalhal’s published statements were known prior to the events of September 11 th , and that Mulhalhal has ties to IRAQI intelligence, demonstrates foreknowledge of the planned attacks by BIN LADEN and indicates support by IRAQI co-conspirators.

110. According to U.S. and foreign intelligence officials, in the spring of 2000, IRAQI INTELLIGENCE agents met with September 11 th pilot hijackers ZAID SAMIR JARRAH and MARWAN AL-SHEHHI in Dubai, UAE in order to advance the hijacking of U.S. aircraft to commit terrorist acts. Not long after the meeting, AL-SHEHHI entered the United States on May 29 and JARRAH entered on June 27, to begin preparations for attacks.

133. Instruction documents on an artillery weapon known as the “Super Gun” were found in AL QAEDA camps when they were captured by U.S. forces in the winter of 2001-2002. IRAQ is the only state known to have purchased and assembled the super gun, a weapon so large it must be constructed in segments. It has a range of several hundred miles.

Is THAT enough evidence for you? BTW...will someone in your group please inform Harry Brown that he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about on this issue and so he should just steer clear of the radio talk shows!
27 posted on 01/30/2003 10:11:42 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
”Did we learn from this tragedy? Ask the surviving members of the Branch Davidian conflict. A short eight months after Ruby Ridge“

As a near Objectivist, I was somewhat supportive of Libertarians before reading the idiotic drool spewing from them on the War on Terrorism.

- First there were the geniuses at CATO publishing that because Bush presented little evidence of Iraq’s terrorist connections that there were none.

-Then there was an official LP press release stating that that since Saddam agreed to “unconditional inspection” that Bush’s war mongering demonstrated his dishonesty.

-And now this fool wants to compare Iraq to Ruby Ridge and WACO. Please, post this dribble everywhere. Repeat it frequently and make some more Republicans.

30 posted on 01/30/2003 10:15:39 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
Let me know how it feels to step on one's wing wang with track cleats.

And, please, don't put out stuff like this as libertarian.

Once my neighbor has fouled the neighborhood and agreed not to do it anymore, then begins to collect the equpiment and means to do it again, I don't have to wait for it to happen to take action.

As Prince Bandar said,"Diddle me once, shame on you. Diddle me twice, shame on me."

33 posted on 01/30/2003 10:24:59 AM PST by Eagle Eye (One cannot support the WoD and still support the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
If Hussein really is a threat to us in the future, a terrorist waiting to happen, then wait for it to happen.

I can tell you don’t live or work around NYC or DC, if you do you’re a moron. So you just sit there all safe and secure in bum-funk where ever you live other than around here and leave it to the grown-ups to make the decisions, OK Barbie? I’m so glad you Liberaltarians are such an insignificant entity in our politics.

34 posted on 01/30/2003 10:25:21 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided
Did we learn from this tragedy?

We learned that a cabin and a tin building are not fortified positions.

We also learned that, in the Koresh case, with a backhoe and a few months time a person could have constructed a dandy tank trap. The end result would probably have been the same but it would have taken longer and caused some embarrassment.

38 posted on 01/30/2003 10:30:21 AM PST by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson