To: 4Liberty
i wonder if a smoking-nuclearbomb is enough for the liberals?...never mind-dumb question
To: InvisibleChurch
But a nuclear bomb is useless without a missile. Just like chemical warheads.
/sarcasm
5 posted on
01/27/2003 7:08:24 PM PST by
Bogey78O
(It's not a Zero it's an "O")
To: InvisibleChurch
Maybe they'll drop it on Hollywood.
To: InvisibleChurch
Then they will say "Well, there was only the one nuke...it's not as though the US hasn't used nukes or killed people with bombs...it wouldn't be right to cause the deaths of MORE innocent people who have SUFFERED ENOUGH alrady. Let's denounce our imperialistic ways, beat our swords into ploughshares, and redistribute all our income; then we will all live in peace together, with free college and free healthcare and free housing. Free Mumia!"
To: InvisibleChurch
i wonder if a smoking-nuclearbomb is enough for the liberals?...never mind-dumb question. Carter wanted to weld the missle hatches closed on our nuclear submarines. Clinton wanted to change our nuclear response protocol from "launch upon confirmed launch" to "launch upon impact". Gore/Hitlery!/Daschle/Edwards/Pelosi et. al. would probably advocate the following protocol: "grovel upon first threat, pay them all off, then surrender".
To: InvisibleChurch
My guess....the letters R-I-T-T-E-R will be in there somewhere.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson