Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Is there any hard evidence at all to support this sensationalistic claim? I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
1 posted on 01/22/2003 10:12:37 AM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
There's A Better Way To Beat The Media Clymers (And You Don't Have To Skate)!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/22/2003 10:15:43 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xm177e2
My thoughts exactley when I read this piece on Drudge. What a nice round percentage. Seems designed to boost readership and cause a controversy. There is definetley a gay subculture out there that is practicing this sick pursuit (as some freepers on other threads researched) but 25%? That just seems outlandish.
3 posted on 01/22/2003 10:19:59 AM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xm177e2
When the Apollo 11 astronauts returned from the Moon, we put them in quarantine for a month or so, just in case they brought back from the surface of the Moon some hitherto unknown and incurable bacterial or viral organisms.

When I ponder upon the history of AIDS in this country and the world I always remember that cautionary quarantine. Had those three men brought back some disease of the magnitude of HIV, what would we have done with them? Gassed them, then incinerated the quarantine trailer? I wonder.

AIDS has been a tragedy of biblical proportion. It is also a public health issue that has been, from the start, horribly mis-managed. It seems that it still is.

4 posted on 01/22/2003 10:31:18 AM PST by elbucko (Guilty of "Thought Crimes".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xm177e2

7 posted on 01/22/2003 10:44:50 AM PST by MassExodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xm177e2
"With about 40,000 new infections in the United States per year, according to government reports, that would mean 10,000 each year are attributable to that more liberal definition of bug chasing."

Who said this? You? Or are you claiming that Dr. Cabaj extrapolated 10,000 out of 40,000? Please provide your cite.

Dr. Cabaj estimated twenty-five percent of all newly infected gay men, not twenty-five percent of all new infections.

8 posted on 01/22/2003 10:54:54 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xm177e2
I don't know how many of them really WANT to get AIDS. But it doesn't take a rocket scientist these days to understand that every homosexual act of buggery with a stranger subjects you to considerable risks, and even if you are wearing a condom the risks are still very considerable. And since very few homosexual couples are faithful, you are also taking a risk with a known partner.

Condoms are thought to have a failure rate of about 15-25% protecting against the HIV virus.

However you like to characterize it, this kind of behavior still resembles Russian Roulette. It's not clear why the taxpayers should have to subsidize this behavior.
9 posted on 01/22/2003 11:01:04 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xm177e2
18 months ago, a very "out" journalist from the San Francisco Chronical wrote an exhaustive article about this. He, too, introduced readers to these new terms. He had another: "Russian Roulette Party".

Apparently, party attendees pay entrance to such parties at private Bay Area homes. Two rules prevail; no condoms, and no talk whatsoever of HIV status. The catch?

Only the hosts of the party know for sure what person or persons at the party have THE BUG.

How many such people are present? I don't know that, but I guess it varies. I got the feeling that at most parties your odds of getting staying healthy afterwards are pretty good for a 1-time visit, assuming you have only a couple partners.

Look in the SF Chronicle about 18 months ago or so. The article was listed here at FR around that time, and drew many, many hits.

10 posted on 01/22/2003 11:18:28 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

While this is incredibly stupid behavior (risking a deadly disease to enhance 'eroticism'), I would wager that the actual number of gays who intentionally court HIV is about the same as the number of straights who intentionally court hepatitis by engaging in 'scat' or 'watersports'. I.E. a very SMALL percentage. Still, I'm sure it won't stop 'people' tarring all homosexuals with the same brush.
12 posted on 01/22/2003 12:03:27 PM PST by RockandRollResurrection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xm177e2
So that's why the Brits called it "buggery."
19 posted on 01/22/2003 7:44:32 PM PST by keats5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xm177e2
The Bugaloos
The Bugaloos
We're in the air and everywhere
Flyin' high
Flyin' loose
Flyin' free as a summer breeze

The Bugaloos
The Bugaloos
We're climbing high and diving low
Through the sky
Across the land
Straight to you with a helping hand
Ready with a helping hand
20 posted on 01/22/2003 7:47:46 PM PST by Porterville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson