Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/21/2003 10:51:11 AM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brandonmark; Alex P. Keaton; MeeknMing; JohnHuang2; Dog Gone; Dog; isthisnickcool; OKSooner; VOA; ..
These remarks were made by the President this morning so I thought we should see the actual words instead of press spin on what was said.
2 posted on 01/21/2003 10:52:28 AM PST by PhiKapMom (Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Keep Free Republic Rockin' 'Round The Clock!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

3 posted on 01/21/2003 10:53:07 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
As I said, this looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it.

Telling it like it is. AND taking a shot at Hollywood. No wonder I like this guy so much!

6 posted on 01/21/2003 10:57:44 AM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
He speaks in clear terms...says what he means and means what he says. The rest of the world doesn't like that..not diplomatic enough. The whiners will whine, Bush will lead. His attitude this morning was quite clear...he's had enough crap from his "friends" and "allies"...he knows they are babies that are incapable of making a decision. He will adjust accordingly and probably already has. Amen!
7 posted on 01/21/2003 10:58:32 AM PST by Wait4Truth (I HATE THE MEDIA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom

"As I said, this looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it."


8 posted on 01/21/2003 10:59:31 AM PST by Travis McGee (--------------------------- WAR SOLVED HITLER! -------------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom; The Great Satan
BUSH: ...Make no mistake about that, he will be disarmed.

Sounds like soon to me.

10 posted on 01/21/2003 11:00:41 AM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
Bush also has said the U.N. was impotent during the '90's and stopped doing the job they're suppose to do. He's trying to get the U.N. back to work.
No doubt the '90's just offered them a democrat welfare check and they became lazier socialists than they already were. Vey Clintonian.
Bush is trying to get them back off their butts and start paying attention to the real world. "Put down the bongs, boys!"
17 posted on 01/21/2003 11:10:04 AM PST by concerned about politics (Achievement is politically incorrect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MJY1288
Quote of the Day material!!!

This business about, you know, more time -- you know, how much time do we need to see clearly that he's not disarming? As I said, this looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it.

25 posted on 01/21/2003 11:19:40 AM PST by rintense (Go Get 'Em Dubya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
Pizza, beer & popcorn next Wednesday night!

Next week looks to be pretty damned busy - Super Bowl Sunday, (Dragnet premieres Monday) State of the Union Tuesday, hmmmmm. My calendar is clear on Wednesday; how about yours?

33 posted on 01/21/2003 11:26:40 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
No, I answered it. The courts will make the definition of the outer limits of the --

Thanks for flagging me to what Bush said about affirmative action. Bush is not right in saying the courts will necessarily decide this issue. In Bakke, when it had the issue, the Supreme Court punted, as Bush is doing now. Justice O'Connor may well follow the lead of the administration briefs to write an opinion making up a majority that is as opaque as Powell's opinion in Bakke was.

34 posted on 01/21/2003 11:27:29 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
Frankly, I wish the White House had never pursued the WMD angle for going after Iraq. I'm reading WAR OF REVENGE about Saddam's continuing war against America, and there is a strong indication that Iraqi agents were involved in the planning and execution of the first WTC bombing in 1993 (the head of the NY FBI field office that investigated the bombings believed that Iraq was behind it), and hence, were likely involved in the 9/11 attacks. The reason Saddam should be deposed is that he's gassed his neighbors, gassed his own people, invaded neighboring countries, has lobbed missles into Israel, has violated every provision of the ceasefire to the 1991 Persian Gulf War, continues to shoot at our warplanes patrolling Iraqi skies, supports terrorism by making payments to the families of suicide bombers against Israel, and is a murderous thug. It may be that a direct link between Saddam and the two attacks on the WTC cannot be made with certainty, whereas there may be hard evidence of Iraqi WMDs. But regardless of whether Saddam has or is producing WMD, there is sufficient reason to take Saddam out.
39 posted on 01/21/2003 11:34:30 AM PST by My2Cents ("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
Powerful statements, GWB Is The Man!

Be Well - Be Armed - Be Safe - Molon Labe!

53 posted on 01/21/2003 12:22:30 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
"...how much time do we need to see clearly that he's not disarming? As I said, this looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it."

Well said Mr. President!! The situation with Saddam is like watching Groundhog Day, every day for the past eleven years.

55 posted on 01/21/2003 12:36:52 PM PST by cake_crumb (What would we do without FR? Don't wait to find out. Become a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
Thanks for this and the many other goodies you post on FR. (And your insightful comments.)

I had to smile when I saw you'd underlined the final sentence about the rerun of the bad movie that he didn't want to watch. I had been copying and pasting excerpts from the press conference to print for a friend, and I had underlined the "rerun" remark on its earlier mention. GMTA
67 posted on 01/21/2003 1:50:29 PM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson