Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Will Focus On Settlements After War, Wolfowitz Says
Haaretz ^ | Jan 19, 2003 | Aluf Ben

Posted on 01/19/2003 1:05:33 PM PST by Seti 1

U.S. will focus on settlements after war, Wolfowitz says

By Aluf Benn

In his first public comments regarding U.S. policy in the Middle East on the "day after" the anticipated war in Iraq, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz said the administration will intensify its focus on the establishment of a Palestinian state.

In an interview in the Washington Post on Friday, Wolfowitz said, "Our stake in pushing for a Palestinian state will grow" after the war, and he noted that he preferred "concrete steps, like dealing with the settlements" over the advancing of diplomatic issues as part of a "process."

Wolfowitz is the most senior Jewish member of the political and defense branches of the current U.S. administration. He is considered to be the architect behind the current closing in on Iraq, a clear supporter of Israel, and a leading member of the Jewish right in Washington, which includes Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feith, and the National Security Council adviser on the Middle East, Elliot Abrams[Emphasis added].

Wolfowitz has family, including a sister, in Israel, and is well-acquainted with many members of the government, including Nathan Sharansky and former ambassador to Washington, David Ivry.

Several months ago, Wolfowitz represented the administration at a pro-Israel rally, and enraged Jewish activists and the Christian right when he emphasized the need for a political solution to the conflict with the Palestinians.

In a discussion with Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, Wolfowitz stressed that "the Israelis have to be kept out" of any U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

During the previous Gulf War, Wolfowitz held the No. 3 spot at the Pentagon, and he was dispatched to Israel while the country was under attack from Iraqi ballistic missiles.

A senior government source surprised by Wolfowitz's comments on the settlements, attributed them to his desire to rally Arab and European support for the war against Iraq.

"There is no other way to explain it," he said, since the administration has yet to present Israel officially with its expectations on "the day after."

The dominant opinion in Israel is that even after the war in Iraq, the U.S. administration will not rush to pressure Israel into making concessions, because there will be other priorities, and President George Bush will be facing an election year and will need the Jewish vote.

However, reports have reached Jerusalem about comments on the settlements made by Elliot Abrams, who is the administration figure for preparations for "the day after." Abrams, known for his sharp criticism of Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat, has asked, "What do they [the Israelis] want with these settlements?"

In recent weeks the administration's diplomatic focus has been the "road map" to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but the U.S. has not finalized the document's contents with its Quartet partners - the European Union, the United Nations and Russia - on said when final version will be presented. The Europeans are pressing for its completion immediately following Israel's January 28 elections, while the Americans would like to see a government in place before they proceed.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is derisive of the Quartet's efforts in an interview to be published in the Washington Post today: "The Quartet is nothing! I do not take it seriously and I believe that the U.S. also does not take it seriously."

Sharon reiterates a three-phase plan he says he concluded with the U.S. administration: an end to terrorism and a change in Palestinian leadership; establishment of a Palestinian state with temporary borders; and then a permanent solution.

The Israeli government is now waiting for the administration to initiate more intensive contacts leading to approval of the special aid package requested by Jerusalem. Government sources in Jerusalem believe that Washington will make an announcement about this prior to the elections here.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: iraqwar; israelisettlements

1 posted on 01/19/2003 1:05:34 PM PST by Seti 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
Thanks Registered

2 posted on 01/19/2003 1:07:28 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seti 1
No Arab state in Eretz Yisrael. EVER!
3 posted on 01/19/2003 1:50:31 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
What exactly are the boundaries of Eretz Yisrael?
4 posted on 01/19/2003 2:44:30 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Whatever they can win militarily and hold onto, I suppose. I have no problem with that--it's the way the world has always worked. I have a BIG problem with involving the US in it: our money, our reputation, our troops. The Middle East is a seething caldron of rabid hatreds which date back millenia. We should stay clear of anything not connected to a reliable oil supply, and that reluctantly.
5 posted on 01/20/2003 9:31:21 AM PST by Seti 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: inquest
From the Jordan to the Sea.

From the Cedars of Lebanon to the Gaza Strip.
6 posted on 01/20/2003 9:42:52 AM PST by johnb838 (deconstruct the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seti 1
Then you have sealed Israel's doom for they can't fight the whole world. That is what 1973 taught them. Without direct resupply from America, the war would have ended differently as Israel was rapidly running out of materials.

It's hard to predict since I don't believe in crystal balls... but going on past experience, if the area went to war... it would be 1.2 billion Arabs versus 5 million Jews. No matter how well trained an army is... I don't believe it can win against those odds.

That is why Israel cares so much about US opinion. When the final push comes from the Arabs for genocide... Israel will need allies.

7 posted on 01/20/2003 9:50:04 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Contemporaneously, one could say from the Golan Heights (Gamla) west to Rosh Ha-Niqra at the Mediterranian coast, then everything west of the Jordan to all of Gaza and the Negev south to Eilat and the Gulf of Aqaba...or Eilat.

Historically, that gives a fairly close match to the land shown to Moses from atop Mt Nebo in Deuteronomy 34.

8 posted on 01/20/2003 11:00:47 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson