Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHITE HOUSE ANGER AT BOOK BY BUSH 'AXIS OF EVIL' SPEECHWRITER!
Drudge ^ | January 5th 2002. | Drudge

Posted on 01/05/2003 7:13:38 PM PST by ConservativeMan55

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: ExpandNATO
I believe Bush's advisers are familiar with Lewis and Pipes and their recent writings. They would be hard to miss. Being a first-rate theorist and scholar doesn't necessarily make you a useful day-to-day adviser.
21 posted on 01/05/2003 7:32:35 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ExpandNATO
The current equivalent would be giving Daniel Pipes or Bernard Lewis a great say in how to deal with the Middle East.

Sounds like Frum has the same type of snobbery towards think tanks shared by the media and the academy. The national think tanks (and even the regional) have a great deal of high-powered minds that are not welcome in places with a liberal imprimatur. I think Bush's cabinet has many brilliant faces and the tanks are giving him advice to match any academic scholar, especially given the abyssmal condition of our humanities departments.

22 posted on 01/05/2003 7:32:51 PM PST by PianoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: beckett
how paltry the pickings of dissension and scandal are in this WH

So true. And the potentially large impact of this on voters is totally lost on the pundits, who with their craving for things to talk about see no virtue in their absence.

23 posted on 01/05/2003 7:34:34 PM PST by PianoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ExpandNATO
Where in that post did I say to use the nukes?

I said it is helpful in dealing with the Middle East to have Nukes. Certainly if our enemies..er...Americans enemies...the enemies of freedom had nukes they would have used them.
24 posted on 01/05/2003 7:34:42 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Where in that post did I say to use the nukes?

Foul! 15-yard penalty. :)

25 posted on 01/05/2003 7:37:42 PM PST by PianoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Hey, we do have SOME conservatives up here. David Frum is very much a conservative..

I'm glad to hear that...
on both accounts.

No personal offense intended ;0)

26 posted on 01/05/2003 7:38:07 PM PST by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PianoMan
If the damn terrorists had nukes they would use them.
When and if they use them...they will get it right back at em.
27 posted on 01/05/2003 7:39:07 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
He "was hardly the obvious man for the job. But by a very strange fate, he turned out to be, of all unlikely things, the right man."

I find the first part of this statement offensive to say the least. What pray tell makes this true? He ran for President as a governor of a large state, and was elected by the legal process just as any other President has been.

Seems to me that the real statement should be that the author was hardly the obvious man for the job that the President entrusted him with!
He clearly has a agenda here, and it is not hard to decipher his motives.

28 posted on 01/05/2003 7:39:55 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
I completely agree Lady in Red. Bush was elected...and proved that he was the right man for the job. Nobody else could have done a better job.
Well maybe G. Gordon Liddy...but he didn't run.
29 posted on 01/05/2003 7:41:10 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Must every president have a pet of somekind? God forbid we have a petless president.
30 posted on 01/05/2003 7:43:58 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I'm still waiting for your answer. It seems you responded to my post because you felt that I would use the nukes. A classic liberal. Always uses feelings before facts.
31 posted on 01/05/2003 7:44:12 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ExpandNATO
I'm still waiting for your answer. It seems you responded to my post because you felt that I would use the nukes. A classic liberal. Always uses feelings before facts.
32 posted on 01/05/2003 7:45:37 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Clinton had Monica.
33 posted on 01/05/2003 7:46:33 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
"He clearly has a agenda here, and it is not hard to decipher his motives."

Clearly. I will never forget that Bill Kristol went on Fox News shortly before President Bush's State of the Union Address to "predict" that Rudy Guiliani was to be named the first ever Homeland Security Chief. Hours later I collapsed in guffaws when Tom Ridge was named. Later I learned that David Frum, who was formerly a writer for the Weakly Standard was one of the speechwriters. (Although not the head speechwriter.) It was months later that all this flap occurred about the axis of evil, and Frum's wife taking credit for her hubby. I will always believe that the WH was smokin' out their leakers......and Frum was one of the first to fall.......

34 posted on 01/05/2003 7:48:56 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Grig
I agree, the book is probably complimentary to Bush. Let's wait and see.

35 posted on 01/05/2003 7:49:45 PM PST by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
That was very astute of you to notice that.
36 posted on 01/05/2003 7:51:29 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
"Mr. Frum should seriously consider letting the president speak for himself on these highly volatile matters."

Mr. Bush should have spoke for himself to start with.

37 posted on 01/05/2003 7:53:18 PM PST by Ragin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The TODAY SHOW has reserved a money slot for Frum on Tuesday morning.

What in the world is that supposed to mean? Not being a newsee wannabe like drudge.

38 posted on 01/05/2003 7:59:40 PM PST by OReilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
Not everyone takes Frum as seriously as he takes himself. Just for laughs, here's The White House Diaries of David Frum, by some writer in Vancouver.
39 posted on 01/05/2003 8:06:22 PM PST by fromnovascotia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: OReilly
He's going to come on and talk about the State of the Economy.
Of course it means that they've booked him as a guest.
40 posted on 01/05/2003 8:06:37 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson