Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Female Impotence Is A 'Sponsored Creation'
IOL ^ | 1-2-2003

Posted on 01/03/2003 5:51:37 PM PST by blam

Female impotence is a 'sponsored creation'

January 02 2003 at 03:34PM

Paris - A leading medical journal has blasted drugs companies, accusing them of inventing the "disease" of female impotence to help create a lucrative market for Viagra-style treatments aimed at women.

The British Medical Journal (BMJ) says that for the past six years, the pharmaceutical industry had funded and driven an effort to have the theory of "female sexual dysfunction" clinically confirmed and widely disseminated.

Many of the researchers who have published papers or attended conferences on the supposed disorder have financial links with drugs companies, it says in an editorial to appear in next Saturday's issue.

Moreover, the scientific evidence for female sexual dysfunction is often misplaced or absent, and much of it is bent on stoking ideas that inhibited sexual desire is medically abnormal, it adds.

'The corporate sponsored creation of a disease is not a new phenomenon' It notes how a study of the genitalia of female white rabbits, focussing on some of the animals' "vaginal engorgement" and "clitoral erectile insufficiency," was used to draw a parallel about the physical state of women.

Despite these concerns, the media have enthusiastically picked up a figure, criticised by some experts as inflated, that 43 percent of women over 18 suffer from sexual dysfunction, the BMJ says.

The danger, says the editorial, is the obsession with medicalisation, the idea that sexual problems are invariably rooted in physical causes and can be cured by simply taking a pill.

That approach perilously trivialises why some women may have a lack of sexual desire, it says. Stress, tiredness or threatening or abusive behaviour by their partners could be a cause, it says.

"The corporate sponsored creation of a disease is not a new phenomenon, but the making of female sexual dysfunction is the freshest, clearest example we have," says the editorial, written by Ray Moynihan of the Australian Financial Review.

"The potential risk, in a process so heavily sponsored by drug companies, is that the complex social, personal and physical causes of sexual difficulties, and the range of solutions to them, will be swept away in the rush to diagnose, label and prescribe." - Sapa-AFP


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creation; female; impotence; sponsored
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 01/03/2003 5:51:37 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Female impotence? They can't get it up?
2 posted on 01/03/2003 5:54:32 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
And continuing along the same line....

There was an article in the WSJ recently which discussed the push to use anti-depressants to treat shopaholics. (If anyone has access to the on-line version I hope they post it here.) The uncontrollable urge to spend is now considered a mental disorder by some.

Perhaps the two trends are related.

3 posted on 01/03/2003 5:59:08 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Candy is dandy, but liquor is quicker.
4 posted on 01/03/2003 5:59:38 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

5 posted on 01/03/2003 6:06:56 PM PST by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Have any of these tenured geniuses thought of actually asking a few real, live women? I would think it is they, and not white mice, who have the definitive say in the matter.

Stress, tiredness or threatening or abusive behaviour by their partners could be a cause, it says.

Yes, and I remember the hoops the medicos had many men go through in the early days of Viagra to get a scrip, using these same words. Would you believe group counselling? For that private a problem? It's a fact. "It's in your head, relax, stop drinking coffee, eat more bran..." The guys usually nodded, got the stuff off the Internet, and finding that it worked, dispensed with the "it's all in your head" crapola. There is more than one interest group at work here, and if the pharmaceutical companies have a vested interest, so do the headshrinkers.

6 posted on 01/03/2003 6:08:17 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Hmmmmm.
7 posted on 01/03/2003 6:11:22 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
They ought to put it in the water.
8 posted on 01/03/2003 6:14:44 PM PST by MonroeDNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Right on!

Ah, Bill? Just curious, really, none of my business, but...how did you come by your nickname. Ah, strike that. How did you get your nickname?
9 posted on 01/03/2003 6:15:49 PM PST by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
Ah, an old story - there I was in '98, stuck for a screen name and hot to post, so I took the name of the current president and added a reference to his sexual proclivities. When JohnRob finally codes up a way to change my screen name and hang onto my "member since" date I'll be something more personally accurate, like...uh..."Zoltan the Mighty Conqueror"...
10 posted on 01/03/2003 6:20:19 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam
says that for the past six years
I suppose no-one talked about it before then.
This is stupid. What's the issue with there being a potential pharmacetical treatment for certain sexual problems, whatever they may be?
Also, it's a fact that when a drug company feels they have something to market, they market it aggressively. This is no different.
I'd say it's up to the doctor(and patient) to decide whether or not a medication would help a particular patient.
the scientific evidence for female sexual dysfunction is often misplaced or absent
Just because no significant attention has been paid or research done doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
11 posted on 01/03/2003 6:20:47 PM PST by visualops
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
You must be a real babe magnet if you've got to get her drunk first.
12 posted on 01/03/2003 6:21:59 PM PST by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: watchin
Inhibitions are reduced well before inebriation is achieved.
13 posted on 01/03/2003 6:27:31 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
This is just plain silly.

The topic of ""female sexual dysfunction" has been discussed and taught in medical schools for decades and there's many causes. Some drug company just didn't make it up last year!

I think the problem is that this goes against the PC, pro-femist Master & Johnsons report that women's libido increases once they get old enough not to easily concieve and suffer the "burden" of childbirth. (Which is totally ridiculous in the 1st place. Makes no evolutionary sense.)

Women are perfect don't you know. How dare an evil corporation say otherwise!
14 posted on 01/03/2003 6:30:49 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Some years ago, scientists announced that they'd discovered a drug that could make a woman experience orgasm...even if the nerves from the genitals to the brain were severed.

I wrote a letter to the editor (not published for some reason) which merely said: "New hope for Hillary."

--Boris

15 posted on 01/03/2003 6:36:29 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
And here I thought you were a dentist.
16 posted on 01/03/2003 6:37:27 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lizma
"Women are perfect don't you know."

Not so, or they would have the same sex drive as men and be satisfied just as easily, every time. Most of them were short changed for whatever the cause. What a shame.

17 posted on 01/03/2003 6:43:07 PM PST by Buffalo Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head
Yeah? Says you. ha!
18 posted on 01/03/2003 6:58:48 PM PST by LisaAnne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head
The women perfect thing was tongue-in-cheek.

The females are the gate keepers of the evolutionary stock. They have to be selective, picking the brighest and best, to best continue the species. It wouldn't work if all they wanted to do is screw their brains out, no matter the outcome.

(Um, but not so for the ones who appear on Jerry Springer though. Modern times have created a de-evolutionary cushion.)
19 posted on 01/03/2003 7:13:55 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam; Cyrano
much of it is bent on stoking ideas that inhibited sexual desire is medically abnormal

Gee... it feels abnormal to me.

Is this striking you as kind of sexist? I mean, I know that men are gonna have a bigger appetite than women, but for healthy childbearing-age women in a healthy relationship having no desire even during ovulation, there definitely is some change going on that is undesirable. Can you imagine if an article was written saying 'male impotence' is not really much of a problem?

20 posted on 01/03/2003 7:16:55 PM PST by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson