Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Myth of the Second Amendment
Massachusetts ACLU ^ | 12/02

Posted on 12/21/2002 2:30:44 PM PST by pabianice

2nd Amendment

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."

Have you ever heard someone say gun control is a fine idea— except that the Second Amendment prohibits it?

It’s a popular sentiment. Fortunately, it’s not true.

The Second Amendment was never intended as a gun license for the entire American populace. As originally drafted—and as consistently interpreted by the courts for more than a century—the Amendment does not grant any blanket right to own a gun nor does it stand in the way of rational, effective gun control.

The idea of gun ownership as an American birthright is nothing more than a popular myth. Yet the controversy over gun control and the Second Amendment rages on.

As the nation’s oldest and most prominent defender of individual rights, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) holds the U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights in the highest regard. To clear up many misconceptions, what follows are some basic questions and answers about the Second Amendment and gun control.

Q The Second Amendment says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Doesn’t it mean just that?

A There is more to the Second Amendment than just the last 14 words. Most of the debate on the Amendment has focused on its final phrase and entirely ignores the first phrase: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State . . ." And to dissect the Amendment is to destroy its context. While some scholars have suggested that the Amendment gives individuals the constitutional right to bear arms, still others have argued for discarding the Amendment as irrelevant and out of date. However, the vast majority of constitutional experts agree that the right to keep and bear arms was intended to apply only to members of state-run, citizen militias.

Q If it doesn’t guarantee the right to own a gun, why was the Second Amendment included in the Bill of Rights?

A When James Madison proposed the Bill of Rights in the late 1780s, people were still suspicious of any centralized federal government. Just 10 years earlier, the British army been an occupying force in Colonial America—enforcing arbitrary laws decreed from afar. After the Revolutionary War, the states insisted on the constitutional right to defend themselves in case the fledgling U.S. government became tyrannical like the British Crown. The states demanded the right to keep an armed "militia" a form of insurance.

Q What exactly is "a well regulated militia?"

A Militias in 1792 consisted of part-time citizen-soldiers organized by individual states. Its members were civilians who kept arms, ammunition and other military equipment in their houses and barns—there was no other way to muster a militia with sufficient speed. Over time, however, the state militias failed to develop as originally anticipated. States found it difficult to organize and finance their militias and, by the mid-1800s, they had effectively ceased to exist. Beginning in 1903, Congress began to pass legislation that would eventually transform state militias into what is now the National Guard. Today, the National Guard—and Army Reserve—are scarcely recognizable as descendants of militias of the 1790s. The National Guard and Reserve forces, in fact, do not permit personnel to store military weapons at home. And many of today’s weapons—tanks, armored personnel carriers, airplanes and the like—hardly lend themselves to use by individuals.

Q Does the Second Amendment in any way guarantee gun rights to individuals?

A No. The weight of historical and legal scholarship clearly shows that the Second Amendment was intended to guarantee that states could maintain armed forces to resist the federal government. Most scholars overwhelmingly concur that the Second Amendment was never intended to guarantee gun ownership rights for individual personal use. Small arms ownership was common when the Bill of Rights was adopted, with many people owning single-shot firearms for hunting in what was then an overwhelmingly rural nation.

Q Does the Second Amendment authorize Americans to possess and own any firearms they feel they may need?

A Clearly, no. The original intent of the Second Amendment was to protect the right of states to maintain state militias. Private gun ownership that is not necessary to the maintenance of militia is not protected by the Second Amendment.

Q Does the Second Amendment allow government to limit—even prohibit—ownership of guns by individuals?

A Yes. Federal, state and local governments can all regulate guns without violating the Second Amendment. State authorities have considerable powers to regulate guns. The federal government can also regulate firearm ownership, although some scholars believe that the federal power may not be as extensive as that of an individual state. California, for example, has limited the ability of local governments to regulate firearms. While the state has kept its broad regulatory power, cities and counties can only prohibit guns from being carried in public places.

Q How have the courts—particularly the U.S. Supreme Court—interpreted the Second Amendment?

A The Supreme Court has flatly held that the individual’s right to keep and bear arms "is not a right granted by the Constitution." In the four cases in which the high court has addressed the issue, it has consistently held that the Second Amendment does not confer a blanket right of individual gun ownership. The most important Supreme Court Second Amendment case, U.S. v. Miller, was decided in 1939. It involved two men who illegally shipped a sawed-off shotgun from Oklahoma to Arkansas, then claimed the Second Amendment prohibited the federal government from prosecuting them. The court emphatically disagreed, ruling that the Second Amendment had the "obvious purpose" of creating state militias, not of authorizing individual gun ownership. In two earlier rulings in 1876 and 1886, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment affected only the federal government’s power to regulate gun ownership and had no effect on state gun control powers. Those cases, Presser v. U.S. and U.S. v. Cruikshank, formed the basis for the continuing legal decisions that the Second Amendment is not an impediment to rational gun control. In another case that the Supreme Court declined to review, a federal appeals court in Illinois ruled in 1983 that the Second Amendment could not prevent a municipal government from banning handgun possession. In the case, Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove, the appeals court held that contemporary handguns couldn’t be considered as weapons relevant to a collective militia.

Q The National Rifle Association (NRA) says the Second Amendment guarantees our right to keep and bear arms. Has the NRA got it wrong?

A Like any powerful special interest, the NRA works to secure its financial well being. It insists on a view of the Second Amendment that defies virtually all court decisions and contradicts findings of most legal scholars. In so doing, the NRA actively perpetuates a seemingly endless cycle of gun-related fatalities. The NRA intimidates politicians because it is very well financed and, like any wealthy single-issue special interest, can muster considerable pressure and scare tactics against legislators who oppose it. For decades, the NRA has effectively promulgated its message. Other voices have recently begun to be heard, however, including the public health community, civil rights and civil liberties organizations and groups committed to women’s, children’s and family rights. The NRA implies that the Bill of Rights forces us to accept unlimited gun ownership and tolerate the human tragedies that guns cause in our society. That simply isn’t true.

Q What are the Second Amendment positions of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Massachusetts?

A For decades, both the national ACLU and its Massachsetts affiliates have agreed the Second Amendment guarantees only the rights of states to maintain militias. The national ACLU has urged caution over gun control laws that, though well intended, might infringe on other civil liberties. The ACLU of Massachusetts believes effective gun control—especially of handguns and assault weapons—is essential to curbing the escalating violence in our society.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; civilwarcoming; commiescum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last
To: Johnny Shear
And you are to be trusted with... what?

121 posted on 12/23/2002 8:51:28 AM PST by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Shear
Yeah...YOU'RE to be trusted with firearms.

I hope he lives in my neighborhood, too.

122 posted on 12/23/2002 10:20:27 AM PST by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
And you are to be trusted with... what?

The ability to identify unstable whack-jobs, for one.

123 posted on 12/23/2002 12:13:12 PM PST by Johnny Shear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Shear
Thanks for letting the rest of us know where you stand.
124 posted on 12/23/2002 1:48:17 PM PST by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Yes, I stand against kooks, whack-jobs and those who threaten cold-blooded murder.
125 posted on 12/23/2002 3:05:29 PM PST by Johnny Shear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Shear
It won't be murder, but it will be cold blooded.

L

126 posted on 12/23/2002 3:09:45 PM PST by Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Ugh.
127 posted on 12/23/2002 3:28:51 PM PST by Johnny Shear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
In another place and in another time, guys like this Shear found useful employment as camp guards or neighborhood block watchers. The lessons of history are always lost on this type.
128 posted on 12/23/2002 3:46:21 PM PST by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: nygoose
All your questions: yes.

We are in databases, "you-know-who" knows exactly the websites we visit. I filled out a form when I bought a revolver, I'm sure they still have that information.

Your scenario is scary and I hope it does not come to that.

I plan to be open about my views to the very end even after I lose my ability to back them up with physical force. If loving the Bill of Rights makes me an enemy to those with the official guns, so be it. I think openness is the best way anyhow for all involved. Trying to keep secrets just makes one look paranoid. I'd rather be like John Hancock with the biggest signature on the page. Here I am. I believe in the Constitution. So sue me.
129 posted on 12/24/2002 7:34:25 AM PST by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
"When James Madison proposed the Bill of Rights in the late 1780s, people were still suspicious of any centralized federal government"

Precisely why the 2nd Amendment MUST apply to individuals. If States only can keep and bear arms, within the context of militias, then we have one part of government supposedly protecting the people from another part of government. That's a little like having the fox guard the henhouse...and the people still get screwed. What if the State government is just as corrupt and power hungry as the Federal? The Amendment MUST refer to individuals, because the whole idea, as Madison saw and dealt with it, was a distrust of centralized government IN ANY FORM. What difference is there if the abusive central government is the Federal government, or the State government? A difference which makes no difference, IS no difference

130 posted on 12/24/2002 7:55:24 AM PST by nobdysfool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The ACLU was founded by Communists, financed by the Soviet Union,

Is this true? I have never researched the ACLU's origins, and find this makes alot of sense. What proof exists to verify this?

Merry Christmas

Hat-Trick

131 posted on 12/24/2002 8:09:54 AM PST by Hat-Trick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
What part of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" does this guy not understand?

Lenin would call this guy and the aclu "useful idiots".
132 posted on 12/24/2002 8:18:39 AM PST by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
The Myth of the Second Amendment

Gun control means you don't myth!

133 posted on 12/24/2002 8:25:57 AM PST by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."

Have you ever heard someone say gun control is a fine idea- except that the Second Amendment prohibits it? ... It's a popular sentiment. Fortunately, it's not true.

``A well-read public, being necessary for the literacy of a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed.''

134 posted on 12/24/2002 8:29:43 AM PST by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Any reading that indicates the rights of an individual to bear arms is not in the Second Amendment totally ignores the intent of the framers of the Constiutution and those who voted to adopt the document. Any objective reading of the contemporary writings of Madison, Patrick Henry, and Jefferson would prove the point that the intended right to bear arms was individual.

Further, the right to make laws regarding firearms is a state issue, not the domaine of the federal government.

This only underlines the need for more strict constructionist judicial appointments.

135 posted on 12/24/2002 8:46:01 AM PST by JonH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hat-Trick
In 1919 Woodrow Wilson appointed A. Mitchell Palmer as his attorney general. Palmer had previously been associated with the progressive wing of the party and had supported women's suffrage and trade union rights. However, once in power, Palmer's views on civil rights changed dramatically.

Worried by the revolution that had taken place in Russia, Palmer became convinced that Communist agents were planning to overthrow the American government. His view was reinforced by the discovery of thirty-eight bombs sent to leading politicians and the Italian anarchist who blew himself up outside Palmer's Washington home.
Palmer recruited John Edgar Hoover as his special assistant and together they used the Espionage Act (1917) and the Sedition Act (1918) to launch a campaign against radicals and left-wing organizations.

A. Mitchell Palmer claimed that Communist agents from Russia were planning to overthrow the American government. On 7th November, 1919, the second anniversary of the Russian Revolution, over 10,000 suspected communists and anarchists were arrested in what became known as the
Palmer Raids. Palmer and Hoover found no evidence of a proposed revolution but large number of these suspects were held without trial for a long time. The vast majority were eventually released but Emma Goldman and 247 other people, were deported to Russia.

In January, 1920, another 6,000 were arrested and held without trial. Palmer and Hoover found no evidence of a proposed revolution but large number of these suspects, many of them members of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), continued to be held without trial. When Palmer announced that the communist revolution was likely to take place on 1st May, mass panic took place. In New York, five elected Socialists were expelled from the legislature.

A group of people appalled by the way people were being persecuted for their political beliefs decided in 1920 to establish the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Early members included Roger Baldwin, Norman Thomas, Jane Addams, John Haynes Holmes, Freda Kirchwey, Chrystal Eastman, Florence Kelley, Lillian Wald, Felix Frankfurter, Oswald Garrison Villard, Paul Kellogg, Clarence Darrow, John Dewey, Charles Beard, Abraham Muste, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn and Upton Sinclair.

The ACLU's main concern was to defend the civil rights that were guaranteed in state and federal constitutions. This included:

(1) First Amendment rights: These include freedom of speech, association and assembly, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, including the strict separation between church and state.

(2) Equal protection of the law: The right to equal treatment regardless of race, sex, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, age, physical handicap, or other such classification. These rights apply to the voting booth, the classroom, the workplace and the courts.

(3) Due process of law: The right to be treated fairly when facing criminal charges or other serious accusations that can result in such penalties as loss of employment, exclusion from school, denial of housing, or cut-off of benefits.

(4) The right of privacy and autonomy which cannot be penetrated by the government or by other institutions, like employers, with substantial influence over the individual's rights.

Roger Baldwin was appointed as the first director of the ACLU and over the next thirty five years was involved in the campaign against, the Espionage Act, the Tennessee Anti-Evolution Law, lynching, Jim Crow, McCarthyism and Racial Segregation.

136 posted on 12/24/2002 11:21:31 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Hat-Trick
Roger Baldwin was born in Wellesley, Massachusetts, on 21st January, 1884. After graduating from Harvard University in 1905, Baldwin taught sociology at Washington University in St. Louis (1906-09).

Baldwin was a pacifist and on the outbreak of the First World War joined with Abraham Muste, Norman Thomas, Scott Nearing and Oswald Garrison Villard to form the Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR).

Soon after the outbreak of the First World War Baldwin, Crystal Eastman, Jane Addams, Lillian Wald, Paul U. Kellogg and Oswald Garrison Villard established the American Union Against Militarism (AUAM). Wald became the AUAM's president and Eastman its executive director. Over the next couple of years the AUAM lobbied against America's possible involvement in the war. It also campaigned against conscription, the arms trade and American imperialism in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Baldwin replaced Crystal Eastman as the AUAM's executive director in 1916. The following year Baldwin, Eastman and Norman Thomas established the National Civil Liberties Bureau (NCLB).

In 1918 Baldwin was imprisoned for his public support of conscientious objectors. While in prison he met fellow radicals, Agnes Smedley and Mollie Steimer. Smedley had charged with diseminating birth control information. Steimer had been imprisoned for circulating leaflets in opposition to United States intervention in the Russian Civil War.

After his release in 1919 Baldwin joined the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). The following year he joined with Norman Thomas, Jane Addams, Chrystal Eastman, Clarence Darrow, John Dewey, Abraham Muste, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn and Upton Sinclair to form the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

Baldwin was appointed as the first director of the ACLU and over the next thirty five years was involved in the campaign against the Palmer Raids, the Espionage Act, the Tennessee Anti-Evolution Law, Jim Crow, McCarthyism and Racial Segregation. Roger Baldwin died on 26th August, 1981.

137 posted on 12/24/2002 11:36:05 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Hat-Trick
Mollie Steimer was born in Dunaevtsky, Russia, on 21st November, 1897. When she was fifteen her family emigrated to the United States and settled in New York.

Steimer found work in a garment factory and soon became involved in
trade union activities. This led to her reading books on politics including those by August Bebel (Women and Socialism), Mikhail Bakunin (Statehood and Anarchy), Peter Kropotkin (Memoirs of a Revolutionist) and Emma Goldman (Anarchism and Other Essays).

In 1917 Steimer joined the Frayhayt, a group of
Jewish anarchists based in New York. Steimer shared a six-room apartment at 5 East 104th Street in Harlem with members of the group. This also became the place where the Frayhayt held its meetings and published its newspaper, Der Shturm (The Storm).

The Frayhayt group were opposed to the
United States becoming involved in the First World War. On 23rd August, 1918, six members of the group were arrested for publishing articles that undermined the American war effort. This included criticizing the United States government for invading Russia after the Bolshevik government signed the Brest-Litovsk Treaty.

One of the group, Jacob Schwartz, was so badly beaten by the police when he was arrested that he died soon afterwards. The others, charged under the terms of the
Espionage Act, appeared in court and on 25th October, Steimer was found guilty and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. Three of the men, Samuel Lipman, Hyman Lachowsky and Jacob Abrahams received twenty years.

Many people in the United States were appalled by these sentences. This included people such as
Roger Baldwin, Norman Thomas, Felix Frankfurter, Margaret Sanger and Lincoln Steffens. A group, the League of Amnesty of Political Prisoners was formed and it published a leaflet on the case, Is Opinion a Crime? Steimer and the the other three anarchists were released on bail to await the results of their appeal.

Over the next few months Steimer was arrested seven times but after being held in various prisons was always released without charge. On the 30th October, 1919, she was arrested she was taken to Blackwell Island. While in prison the
Supreme Court upheld her conviction under the Espionage Act. Steimer was now transferred to the Jefferson City Prison in Missouri.

During this period
A. Mitchell Palmer, the attorney general and his special assistant, John Edgar Hoover, used the Sedition Act to launch a campaign against radicals and their organizations. Using this legislation it was decided to deport immigrants from Europe who had been involved in left-wing politics. This included Steimer, Emma Goldman, Alexander Berkman and 245 other people who were deported to Russia.

Deported to Russia on the Estonia, Steimer arrived in Moscow on 15th December, 1921. The Bolshevik government hated anarchists and soon became a target for the Russian Secret Police. On 1st November, 1922 she was arrested with her partner,
Senya Fleshin and charged with aiding criminal elements in Russia.

Sentenced to two years in Siberia, Steimer managed to escape and return to Moscow where she worked for the Society to Help Anarchist Prisoners. She was soon arrested and on 27th September she was deported to Germany where she joined
Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman in Berlin.

With
Senya Fleshin Steimer opened a photographic studio in Berlin. Steimer was also active in the Joint Committee for the Defense of Revolutionaries (1923-1926) and the Relief Fund of the International Working Men's Association for Anarchists (1926-32).

When Hitler came to power Steimer and
Senya Fleshin were forced to flee to Paris. When France was invaded by the German Army the couple moved to Mexico where they ran a photographic studio. Mollie Steimer died in Cuernava, Mexico, on 23rd July, 1980.
138 posted on 12/24/2002 11:38:48 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Hat-Trick
"Is this true? I have never researched the ACLU's origins, and find this makes alot of sense. What proof exists to verify this?"

Masses of evidence verifies that the ACLU was founded by Communists, including the 3 posts above that constitutes merely the tip of the red iceberg.

139 posted on 12/24/2002 11:41:19 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
History has repeatedly shown that those who set about to disarm a population, shortly thereafter demonstrate, clearly and simply, why that population needed to be armed in the first place.
140 posted on 12/24/2002 4:55:46 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson