#2:
"Man, considered as a creature, must necessarily be subject to the laws of his Creator, for he is entirely a dependent being....And, consequently, as man depends absolutely upon his Maker for everything, it is necessary that he should in all points conform to his Maker's will...this will of his Maker is called the law of nature. These laws laid down by God are the eternal immutable laws of good and evil...This law of nature dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any validity if contrary to this... Sir William Blackstone
What right does the state have to say that if you dog shows undue interest in said activity, it your duty to turn him or her away?
None of these topics is, thank God, addressed by the U.S. Constitution. Those who ask the Supreme Court to read a right to sexual freedom into the Constitution should consider all the other bogus rights such a liberal court is likely to read into the Constitution, such as the right of a state to ignore the second amendment. Your can't favor rule of law and then ask the Supreme Court to ignore the plain meaning of the Constitution in its decisions.