Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
When Ritter ... left Iraq, he was swearing that the US was doing the wrong thing and that Saddam had to be monitored. Later on is when he went through his converesion in reverse. Strange...

Ritter was correct to say that Saddam needed to be monitored, but under the circumstances when he left, it was just another UN boondoggle since Saddam was refusing access to the spots most in need of inspection. I therefore conclude that Ritter has been full of S#1+ all along since it appears that what he wanted was "the spotlight". Obviously UN inspections as he was demanding were useless and of value only for propaganda purposes ... by Saddam (just like now, hmmm?).

55 posted on 12/06/2002 8:28:39 PM PST by Optimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Optimist
I was never comfortable with the idea that an inspection team could root out the presence of WMDs anyway. How could they possibly be the definitive resource for whether an entire nation had or hadn't stored them in some remote spot?
75 posted on 12/06/2002 11:30:56 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson