Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Egyptologists: It is Time to Prove Your Claims
World Mysteries ^ | FR Post 12-2-2002 | by Will Hart

Posted on 12/02/2002 4:30:56 PM PST by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: vannrox
Regarding the pyramids: How about if you quarry the stones as more or less round, and roll them to the site and finish shaping them there. As you go higher, you pile dirt so that you make a dirt ramp to the top. Basically, you are building a mountain of dirt with the pyramid being built inside the mountain. When you are done, you put the dirt back where it came from.
41 posted on 12/02/2002 9:37:23 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Thanks for the fascinating posts. However, this gentleman has some beliefs he is not sharing with us.
42 posted on 12/02/2002 10:14:00 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
BUMP
43 posted on 12/02/2002 10:17:35 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj; vannrox; VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; blam
Pyramids schmyramids.

Let's talk about Baalbek.

Some of the larger stones in Baalbek weigh in at about 750 tons.

The largest Baalbek stone never made it all the way to the structure. It's 68' x 14' x 14', and estimated at over 1200 tons.

How'd they do that?





44 posted on 12/03/2002 12:10:51 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
A few months ago a wide-eyed Freeper tried to claim that we couldn't cut and move even 20-ton stone blocks even *today*.

So I went web-searching for rebuttal, and ran across *hundreds* of examples of routine quarrying of blocks in the 20-1000 ton range, *including* such examples as 50-ton granite blocks cut and moved large distances in the 1800's using nothing fancier than a wooden cart and a bunch of horses.

Subsitute a large team of slaves for the horses, and clearly the Egyptians were up to the same level of task, at the very least.

45 posted on 12/03/2002 1:07:39 AM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Don't know how they did that, but I'd be more impressed it they'd got the big one all the way to where it went.
46 posted on 12/03/2002 9:01:07 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
No mystery about the pyramids. In all those Afro-centric courses they teach these days, it is revealed that the ancient Egyptians were black, could fly, and had command of secret powers.
Ancient Egyptian Flying Vehicles.
Multicultural Pseudoscience.
47 posted on 12/03/2002 9:46:41 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; LogicWings
A great read you might enjoy....
48 posted on 12/03/2002 9:52:33 AM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
I've seen recent film of Easter islanders finishing, moving, and erecting a monolith with primitive tools and methods.

Is the article arguing there were no geniuses before modern times?

49 posted on 12/03/2002 9:59:01 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
He found that the theory could not even stand up to the rigours of routine investigative journalism<.

Apparently, neither does the idea that we went to the moon. Investigative journalism? Rigors?

50 posted on 12/03/2002 9:59:53 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Well maybe the planet saturn was orbiting around earth at the time so there was less gravity so the eygptians were able to move the stones by hand,

damn, we need Ted Holden back

51 posted on 12/03/2002 10:07:50 AM PST by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pavlovs Dog
According to the online etymology dictionary Replicate comes from the 19th century http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=repl possibly even earlier since the noun form replication (a clear and obvious Latin root work) comes from the 14th century. The things in Blade Runner were replicants.
52 posted on 12/03/2002 10:27:29 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Thank you, bb, I will read through it at my next break. [I still contend the big blocks were poured in place, then later internal solid blocks were placed. and more external blocks were poured in place, then solid internal blocks were placed, then more poured in place, etc, etc. 'Etc' the escape for the non-scientist, don'tcha know!]
53 posted on 12/03/2002 10:30:54 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Even with the aid of trucks and helicopters they could not position the stones accurately and the finished pyramid turned out to be a haphazard mess.

That's probably because they cut the stones to size before they lifted them to their spots.

That's a bit of presumption on the part of the modern-day builders.

If, however, a stone of approximately the right size were placed up there, it could then be dressed to the proper dimensions in situ. IOW, no need for precision rock-shifting.

As for the rest, it's brute force -- and the Pharoahs were not shy about using it.

54 posted on 12/03/2002 10:35:14 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
To me, his point is not very clear. I think he's arguing that the explanations made so far are completely inadequate, and then perhaps that there were geniuses before modern times, they were so smart that we can't figure out how they did it.
55 posted on 12/03/2002 8:11:48 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; blam; FairOpinion
saw the original edition in William Corliss' newsletter, bought it from him (I think), read it, really like it, recommend it.

The Pyramids: An Enigma Solved The Pyramids: An Enigma Solved
by Joseph Davidovits

hardcover earlier edition with Margie Morris


56 posted on 08/09/2004 7:02:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

B4L8r


57 posted on 08/09/2004 8:00:25 PM PDT by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

read later.


58 posted on 08/09/2004 8:05:35 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

NOW you tell us! I went to the link, it's out of print!

Now you have to tell me what Daidovits concluded. :)


59 posted on 08/09/2004 10:21:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The thread is interesting too. Thanks for the ping.


60 posted on 08/09/2004 10:22:47 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson