To: Behind Liberal Lines
Just posted:
Deferential to the ruling party? Yeah, that's the ticket . . . deference, yeah, that's it! CNN and MSNBC are so VERY deferential to Bush and the White House.
Maybe that's why CNN so gleefully reported the Canadians' ongoing mislabeling of our Commander in Chief's mental capacity.
Maybe that's why Christiane Amanpour, the most vitriolic Palestinian apologist on TV, still has a job that allegedly forces her to be bias-free. (Hint: if she were actually bias-free, I wouldn't be able to smell her anti-Israel sentiment from my living room.)
Maybe that's why Tim Russert tossed Kerry so many softballs during his Sunday interview.
Maybe that's why no interviewer on any of the three major networks has ever asked Hillary Clinton . . . oh, skip it. Too many things real people would like to ask her about.
Deference to the ruling party. Yep, Krugman nailed it again. Give that man a Miller.
4 posted on
12/02/2002 7:37:13 AM PST by
Xenalyte
To: Xenalyte
BUMP
5 posted on
12/02/2002 7:39:11 AM PST by
ppaul
To: Xenalyte
Ganett owned and operated, what else can you expect from the
Democrat & Communist?
6 posted on
12/02/2002 7:46:19 AM PST by
bc2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson