Skip to comments.
Goldman Sachs ‘sweetener’ row (NEW FINANCIAL SCANDAL)
The Sunday Times ^
| November 24, 2002
| Sunday Times
Posted on 11/23/2002 4:15:50 PM PST by MadIvan
ONE of the worlds biggest investment banks, Goldman Sachs, faces a probe into allegations that it engaged in some of the unethical business practices in London that have shaken Wall Street.
MPs last night demanded an investigation by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), the City watchdog, after evidence emerged suggesting Goldmans London office had issued cheap shares to favoured clients at the height of the stock market boom. Ordinary investors got access to the shares only after their value had started to soar.
In one flotation organised by Goldmans in April 2000, two long-term clients were allocated shares which immediately jumped in value by 150%. The pair made a profit of nearly £500,000. The following month Goldmans made millions in fees when it floated their firm on the London stock market.
On Wall Street, the same alleged behaviour, known as spinning, has led to inquiries against Goldmans and other investment banks by New York prosecutors. The banks are also being pursued through the civil courts by private investors forced to buy shares in the same flotations at higher prices.
The Sunday Times has also obtained internal e-mails from Goldmans that suggest the banks analysts regarded advice they were giving on the future value of certain telecoms shares as ridiculous. The e-mails also imply researchers were under pressure to back firms whose executives provided millions of pounds in fees.
Yesterday John McFall, chairman of the Commons Treasury committee, said he would be contacting Sir Howard Davies, the FSAs executive chairman, to urge him to collect all evidence that might expose any questionable practices in the City. What The Sunday Times has uncovered is worthy of further investigation, he said.
The government has hesitated to order an in-depth inquiry into spinning, citing a lack of evidence. Last night an FSA spokesman said it would examine the new material as part of ongoing inquiries.
Goldman denies its advice to investors has ever been influenced by pressure from clients. It also denies giving any special treatment in the allocation of shares in stock floatations.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: New York; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: city; london; scandal; spinning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
The most unethical of my classmates at my university went into investment banking. (Now) Senator Corzine was once at Goldman Sachs. Now this. Coincidence?
Regards, Ivan
1
posted on
11/23/2002 4:15:50 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: Toirdhealbheach Beucail; TopQuark; TexKat; Iowa Granny; vbmoneyspender; America's Resolve; ...
Bump!
2
posted on
11/23/2002 4:16:02 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: Howlin; Miss Marple; Dog
FYI ....
Hmmmmm ... And who use to work for Goldman Sachs
3
posted on
11/23/2002 4:20:36 PM PST
by
Mo1
To: MadIvan
You went to school with Senator Daddy Warbucks??????
4
posted on
11/23/2002 4:24:10 PM PST
by
mware
To: mware
No no no, my most unethical classmates went into investment banking. Senator Corzine, like them, is an unethical scumbag. I don't know Senator Corzine, and I don't care to know him.
Regards, Ivan
5
posted on
11/23/2002 4:25:48 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
Lucky you Ivan, I got that crook as my senator for the next 4 years.
6
posted on
11/23/2002 4:27:16 PM PST
by
mware
To: mware
To my mind, he is the worst sort of person: a fellow who got filthy rich and now doing his damndest to make sure no one else achieves the same.
Say, didn't Rubin work at Goldman Sachs too?
Regards, Ivan
7
posted on
11/23/2002 4:28:23 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
Rubin RAN Goldman.
To: MadIvan
I went to university with Goldman Sacks's Vice Chairman, Robert (whatever his last name was). His dad got him the job. He had little to do as a real job, in the last 30 some years (since he started at the top), other than to run over to CNN (when needed, to comment on a Wall Street Story, as a knowledgeable insider).
9
posted on
11/23/2002 4:39:08 PM PST
by
OReilly
To: MadIvan
I think Rubin is tied to Citibank. During the Enron investigation he was the one who attempted to get someone in the Treasury Dept. to stall on changing Enrons ratings.
10
posted on
11/23/2002 4:40:52 PM PST
by
mware
To: MadIvan
Goldman Sachs.
Hmmmm...
Isn't that the outfit Senator John Corzine (D-NJ) used to run?
Why isn't this news a "surprise"?
11
posted on
11/23/2002 4:41:59 PM PST
by
Gritty
To: MadIvan
And this country puts felons who are convicted of stealing from stores 3 times in jail for life. Bank robbers, even those without weapons, frequently do 10-15 years.
Anyone want to bet what these crooks will do? And people still scoff at eventual revolution in the West? Just let society breakdown for a week.....
12
posted on
11/23/2002 4:50:15 PM PST
by
txzman
To: MadIvan
Bob Rubin preceded Corzine as head of Goldman Sachs.
To: mware
Rubin's at Citi now, but before his stint with the Clinton administration he was head of Goldman Sachs.
To: aristeides
Somewhere in that spider web he is linked to Worldcom too. This of couse being us to Terrible Terry, who is linked with Hillary who is married to Bubba.
There is your 6 degrees of seperation.
15
posted on
11/23/2002 4:59:19 PM PST
by
mware
To: OReilly
I just did a google search on "Goldman Sachs Vice Chairman" and did not realize the they had so many. The Robert, I went to university with, was Robert Hormatz. Can't vouch for his correctitude, as he joined the fraternity with the most extensive exam files. (and this before it was a common thing)
16
posted on
11/23/2002 5:01:56 PM PST
by
OReilly
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: MadIvan
Corzine was such a piece of garbage that even Goldman Sach's didn't want him on their payroll any longer.
To: MadIvan
There is NO doubt that this is true. I have personally seen the favoritism at Goldman Sachs. That this occurred is a given.
19
posted on
11/23/2002 5:56:24 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: MadIvan
I wonder if the democrats are going to blame this on Bush??
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson