Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chilepepper
Knowing that a product has met an EAL4 evaluation -- or even an EAL7 evaluation -- tells you absolutely nothing useful. It means that you can have some amount of confidence that the product meets an unknown set of requirements. To give a contrived example, you might need a piece of software that always paints the screen black. I might build a piece of software that paints the screen red with very high reliability, and get it evaluated at EAL4. Obviously my software isn't going to solve your problem.

This "article" has all the force of saying, "Nuh uh". It doesn't disprove the worth of EAL4.
11 posted on 11/18/2002 11:13:49 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bush2000
Not only that, this dweeb doesn't understand the Common Criteria.
12 posted on 11/18/2002 11:16:56 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Bush2000; chilepepper; Lael
This "article" has all the force of saying, "Nuh uh". It doesn't disprove the worth of EAL4.

But your pulling your original "Oh Linux, Where Art Thou?" thread proves it.

BWAAA-HAAA-HAAA!!!!!

13 posted on 11/19/2002 12:40:33 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson