Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq 'Will Accept' UN Resolution
BBC ^ | 11-10-2002

Posted on 11/10/2002 8:29:52 AM PST by blam

Sunday, 10 November, 2002, 13:49 GMT

Iraq 'will accept' UN resolution

Egypt has been pressuring Iraq to comply

Iraq is poised to accept the new United Nations resolution calling on Baghdad to give up its alleged weapons of mass destruction, according to Arab League foreign ministers.

There are statements at the highest level in Baghdad on the readiness to co-operate with any resolution which carries assurances that it does not foresee a military strike

An emergency session of the Iraqi parliament has been called to debate the issue.

So far, Iraq has said only that it is "quietly" studying the resolution and will announce its position in the next few days.

Arab League ministers - who gathered in Cairo for an extraordinary session on Sunday - said they wanted Iraq to comply in order to avoid US-led military intervention that they fear would unleash popular anger across the region.

After meeting Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri, his Egyptian and Saudi counterparts indicated that Baghdad had already accepted the resolution, the BBC's Heba Saleh reports from Cairo.

"There are statements at the highest level in Baghdad on the readiness to co-operate with any resolution which carries assurances that it does not foresee a military strike," said Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher.

The new UN resolution calls for unimpeded inspections

His Saudi counterpart, Saud al-Faisal, said the Arab ministers "welcomed Iraq's acceptance" of the resolution "following assurances from Syria that this resolution does not provide for automatic military action".

Resolution 1441 was passed by all 15 members of the Security Council on Friday, including the only current Arab member, Syria.

In his first comments on Saturday, Mr Sabri did not reject the resolution outright, focusing instead on the absence of any clause that would give the US the automatic right to take military action to force Baghdad to comply.

Meanwhile, the United States is pressing ahead with planning for a possible military attack on Iraq.

Even Syria voted in favour of the new resolution

The New York Times, quoting senior administration officials, says President George W Bush has approved a war plan for Iraq, involving up to a quarter of a million troops.

And a senior defence official told the BBC that the Pentagon was already looking at where it might station forces in Iraq in order to ensure stability in the aftermath of any conflict.

Cautious optimism

The UN resolution was backed with a threat of "serious consequences" if Baghdad failed to show it had got rid of its weapons of mass destruction.

Next steps 7 days: Iraq must confirm whether it will "comply fully" with the resolution 30 days: Iraq must reveal all programmes, plants and materials which could be used for weapons production 45 days: Inspectors must be allowed to resume their checks Thereafter, inspectors have 60 days to report back to the Security Council but may report violations earlier

Baghdad has until Friday to accept what the council called "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations".

Iraqi state television said on Sunday that parliament had been summoned by President Saddam Hussein to debate the resolution.

However it did not say when the emergency session would take place.

Ministers from all 22 Arab League states were expected to attend the meeting in Cairo.

A source close to the meeting told our correspondent that preliminary talks had been mostly harmonious.

He said there were none of the heated exchanges and bombastic rhetoric which often characterise such meetings.

Even though the Arabs see the UN resolution as a last chance to avert war, they still mistrust America's intentions, our correspondent says.

They have repeatedly warned that a US-led war would destabilise the region - unleashing popular unrest and exacerbating existing tensions.

Our correspondent adds that Syria's "yes" vote at the Security Council will have been taken as a strong message in Baghdad, and this time there is no room for manoeuvre.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: accept; iraq; resolution; un

1 posted on 11/10/2002 8:29:52 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Iraq 'Will Accept' UN Resolution

Awwwww. Ain't that nice of 'em? And within a few months, they'll be stonewalling the inspectors again, all the while working feverishly to assemble some hideous instrument of mayhem.

The spirit of Neville Chamberlain lives!

2 posted on 11/10/2002 8:33:14 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
But, but, but Scott Ritter opposes this and says it is unfair to poor Saddam....
3 posted on 11/10/2002 8:35:40 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
The spirit of Neville Chamberlain lives!

???.....yeah, right.

4 posted on 11/10/2002 8:38:41 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Hey, maybe they accept it "unconditionally" </sarcasm>
5 posted on 11/10/2002 8:38:49 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
inspectors have 60 days to report back to the Security Council but may report violations earlier

What could be done:

The inspectors report a problem, a delay, a truck, motor running, pulled up to the loading dock at the same time the inspectors approach the building.

Within minutes, American troops secure the perimeter. Saddam dare not respond.

Repeat this 1000 times, and the invasion of Iraq would be complete.

6 posted on 11/10/2002 8:42:34 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Notice how everyone else is accepting before them ahead of time - but so far, they aren't? lol. Priceless. The shills now have to deal with the belligerency of the people they were flaking for. Who regard the wonderful deal negotiated supposedly on their behalf as an outright surrender, that they cannot possibly accept.
7 posted on 11/10/2002 8:42:50 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Iraq accepts new UN resolution, Prince Saud says

CAIRO/WASHINGTON, 10 November 2002 — Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal said yesterday that Baghdad had accepted the United Nation’s new resolution on Iraqi disarmament after obtaining assurances from UN Security Council member Syria, that the resolution did not foresee automatic recourse to military action. “The Arab ministers welcomed Iraq’s acceptance of Resolution 1441, following assurances from Syria that this resolution does not provide for automatic military action (against Baghdad),” the minister told reporters in Cairo.

He was speaking after a meeting of Arab League foreign ministers at the League’s headquarters in the Egyptian capital. The ministers are due to hold an extraordinary meeting today.

8 posted on 11/10/2002 8:47:57 AM PST by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Iraq is poised to accept the new United Nations resolution calling on Baghdad to give up its alleged weapons of mass destruction..."

Why just Baghdad or is that just a figure of speech? Iraq is a large country with many places WMD's could be hidden or stored.

9 posted on 11/10/2002 8:49:56 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"Iraq is a large country with many places WMD's could be hidden or stored."

That's why we're doing this:

Defect To Us, America Tells Iraqi Scientists

10 posted on 11/10/2002 9:02:40 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam
Got it. Thanks!
11 posted on 11/10/2002 9:06:36 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
*ping*

Sorry, buddy.....I couldn't resist.

12 posted on 11/10/2002 9:32:48 AM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"30 days: Iraq must reveal all programmes,
plants and materials which could be used for weapons production"

We have been gathering intelligence on Saddam's capabilities from every means possible. It could be that pieces of information from some of his scientists (those who have already defected and those who still may) will put the nails in Saddam's coffin.
He does not know for certain what we know.

Omission is a material breach. If he does not disclose even one program or facility that we know they have within 30 days, it will be a sign of non-compliance.
13 posted on 11/10/2002 9:41:17 AM PST by Route66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
If Saddam is such a problem why didn't we remove him already? Now if it took time to build up the troops why do we let a Syria determine anything that we do? BTW many reliable sources state that they believe that OBL is alive. Besides OIL what was gained in Afganistan? When the borders are closed then we can see the 1st sign that we are serious. Until then, ya all have been hoodwinked.
14 posted on 11/10/2002 9:50:53 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Digger
BTW many reliable sources state these they believe that OBL is alive

Who cares what these "reliable sources" believe....can they prove it?

........let me guess, when you're digging, you've got your finger up your nose.

15 posted on 11/10/2002 10:02:47 AM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson