[Behind Liberal Lines]

the question, however, is what do the signed treaties provide for?

The problem with continuing to operation under the treaties is, IMHO, they should be considered void as against public policy.

They are a relic of a time where Indians were considered noble savages. Today, we aspire to treat our citizens equally and not put them in guilded "concentration camps."

[dirtboy]

The problem with continuing to operation under the treaties is, IMHO, they should be considered void as against public policy. They are a relic of a time where Indians were considered noble savages. Today, we aspire to treat our citizens equally and not put them in guilded "concentration camps."

They are still legal treaties. Do you advocate breaking a legally-binding treaty to promote your viewpoint here?