[Iron Eagle]

Sorry folks, I like this Forrester guy, but he is a double-digit loser in "My hometown" state of New Jersey.

Forrester, while he's out there beating the drums, might challenge Lautenberg to sign a pledge that he won't resign from the seat during the six year term, further subverting the election process. (Forrester could close the gap if he finds a way, like this one, to keep the election fairness issue on the table for independants.)

[Wrigley]

challenge Lautenberg to sign a pledge that he won't resign from the seat during the six year term,

I really like this idea.

[Blood of Tyrants]

I agree. He should make fairness the issue of this campaign and claim that he has heard the Lautenburg plans to resign early next year and completely subvert the election.

[Exit148]

A

"Forrester, while he's out there beating the drums, might challenge Lautenberg to sign a pledge that he won't resign from the seat during the six year term, further subverting the election process."

BUMP

[Leto]

Forrester should take the footage of the ocnfrontation and the issues raised in this article and make them into a TV ad and run it... a lot. Espically taxing seniors hammer him. The only ads I see here are neg ads run by the louse.

[Theodore R.]

Lautenberg won't debate unless he decides it is in his interest to do so. That's why Nixon wouldn't debate HHH -- it wasn't in his interest to do so. Lautenberg knows that the NJ "democracy" will support him simply because he is the Democrat nominee now. People in NJ never saw anything irregular about the change in nominees. They reasoned that it must be proper because the NJ Supreme Court authorized the chang in candidates to protect the "two-party system," a phenomenon not mentioned in the Constitution. People in NJ have been voting Democrat for senator without interruption since 1978. I don't think they will change their minds this year.