Like many who read this article, I find the history and information interesting. However, it is valid to question how much public resources are devoted to such activity. It seems no matter how much is budgetted ($7 million, or $700K, or $70 million), they're ALWAYS going to expect "to come in at or under that amount". (Most probably AT.)
To: RightWhale; Ditto
FYI, (you guys generally like this stuff.)
To: Willie Green
To: Willie Green
Does it really matter? I'm sitting at the library right now and they just bought 80 or so brand new Dell computers with NEC flat pannel screens. I Wonder how much that cost the taxpayers?
4 posted on
10/13/2002 12:16:06 PM PDT by
Sawdring
To: blam
ping blam
To: Willie Green
Like many who read this article, I find the history and information interesting. However, it is valid to question how much public resources are devoted to such activity. It seems no matter how much is budgetted ($7 million, or $700K, or $70 million), they're ALWAYS going to expect "to come in at or under that amount". (Most probably AT.) If we don't investigate it now its gone forever. 1% of the gross project amount is a reasonable amount to spend on increasing knowledge and preserving history.
To: Willie Green
public resources are devoted to such activity There is much we don't know about America that is buried just under the surface. We don't know, and the Native Americans don't know either. Anytime there is digging, somebody ought to take a look in case there is another of the 1000s of pyramids or mounds or campsites from wayback when. Don't know that allocating a specific percentage of project costs is necessary. It's kind of like mandating a percentage to an artistic-style work to decorate a federal building.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson