Radio Liberty Stripped Of Status (Moscow Times)

By Andrei Zolotov Jr.
Staff Writer Radio Liberty, which has irritated President Vladimir Putin's Kremlin with its coverage of Chechnya, has been stripped of the special legal status it had enjoyed since 1991.

In a decree released Friday, Putin revoked a decree issued by President Boris Yeltsin during the democratic euphoria of August 1991 that granted Radio Liberty, a U.S.-funded Russian-language radio station, the right to open its Moscow bureau and gave Radio Liberty reporters the freedom to work unhindered throughout Russia.

Radio Liberty said the decision would have no immediate effect on its operations.

The Kremlin's information department said Yeltsin's decree "was meant to demonstrate the new Russian leadership's commitment to freedom of speech and press," Interfax reported. But over time, laws allowing free media were developed, while Radio Liberty remained in a privileged position compared with other Russian and foreign media. Putin's decree, the Kremlin said, "restores justice on the Russian information playing field."

At the same time, a Kremlin official complained that despite the end of the Cold War and a new trust in Russian-U.S. relations, the editorial policy of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, or RFE/RL, "has not only failed to lose its ideological bias but recently acquired an even more tendentious character."

"One can see it clearly in its broadcasts to Chechnya and Ukraine, when the choice of news is selective and one-sided," the unnamed official told Interfax.

He added, however, that the decree had nothing to do with RFE/RL's editorial policy.

Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov informed U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell of the decision in a telephone conversation Thursday night.

The Foreign Ministry said Friday that Powell had not objected, Russian news agencies reported.

Radio Liberty officials said they were unworried if the decree meant nothing more than the station losing its special status. "If we are treated in accordance with codified international norms for freedom of the media, there is nothing wrong with this decree," RFE/RL spokeswoman Sonya Winter said by telephone from Prague, where the station has its headquarters. "But if it is another expression of harassment and discrimination, then we would not be happy."

Yelena Glushkova, the Moscow representative for RFE/RL, said she had been in touch with the Foreign Ministry on Friday and received assurances that the bureau's accreditation remained valid and that it would not have to re-register.

She said the decree would not affect the station's broadcasting in Russia, which is carried out by a Russian subsidiary that holds the license to the frequency. "I tend to think that this is just a technical decision aimed at unifying the legal base for media organizations," she said.

Radio Liberty Moscow bureau chief Andrei Shary said he was waiting for further clarification of the station's status.

Igor Yakovenko, the head of the Russian Union of Journalists, said Putin's decree did not raise any red flags, but he said he planned to keep a close eye on the situation.

"It is wrong when all of the media have their freedom guaranteed by the law and one gets a decree on top of it," he said on Ekho Moskvy radio. "But we know that our authorities can apply the law selectively, as was the case with NTV and TV6. If nothing changes for Radio Liberty, it will mean that the government is simply leveling the playing field. But if the station begins to have problems, it will mean that President Putin's decree is political."

Despite its relatively small audience, Radio Liberty has historically occupied a special place among both foreign and Russian-language media. It was built during the Cold War years by merging U.S. government funding and broadcast facilities with the talent of Soviet bloc refugees. The radio's mission was conceived as a "surrogate" local free media to fill a void of information created by Communist censorship and thus help undermine the Soviet system. The station, which was repeatedly jammed by the Soviet government, served as an important source of news and opinion for anti-establishment Russian intellectuals.

Radio Liberty has always heavily focused on the political scene, and it continues to declare the promotion of liberal democracy as one of its main goals. Although its Moscow bureau currently has some of Russia's best reporters on its staff, its criticism of the Kremlin, its inherent dissident mentality and its emphasis on minority rights are often perceived here as anti-Russian.

Yeltsin's decree, which was issued Aug. 27, 1991, just days after the collapse of the hard-line coup attempt, singled out Radio Liberty for its role in reporting about "democratic processes" in Russia and particularly "the activities of the legal leadership of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic during the coup d'etat in the U.S.S.R." It allowed Radio Liberty to open a permanent bureau in Moscow and instructed Russia's Foreign Ministry to accredit its correspondents. It also instructed the mayor of Moscow to "allocate space" for the bureau and asked the Press and Communications ministries to provide the bureau with "communication channels."

Glushkova said the bureau has always paid for its office space and broadcasting channels on a commercial basis. "We have never felt privileged," she said.

She described the 1991 decree as "a safe-conduct pass for Yeltsin's term of rule" and said it might be important for journalists but not for running the bureau.

Radio Liberty has invoked Yeltsin's decree several times in defending its editorial policy on Chechnya from a furious Kremlin. That was the case in January 2000, when Radio Liberty reporter Andrei Babitsky, who was accused by Russian officials of taking a pro-rebel stance in his reporting, was arrested in Chechnya and later exchanged for Russian prisoners held by the separatists.

In January this year, the Kremlin's chief spokesman on Chechnya, Sergei Yastrzhembsky, expressed outrage at a RFE/RL decision to begin broadcasting in three Caucasus languages, including Chechen. He warned that the government would monitor the station's coverage and might revoke its Russian broadcasting license.

In April, RFE/RL launched the Chechen broadcasts, as mandated by Congress two years earlier.

Press Ministry spokesman Yury Akinshin said Radio Liberty would be allowed to continue business as usual. "We have no grounds to revoke its license," he said. "All it [Putin's decree] means is that it will continue developing on the basis of the law and not on [Yeltsin's] decree. It should feel like an ordinary company in Russia, not a privileged one."

The station has a license to broadcast until next year on 1044 AM in Moscow, according to The New York Times.

Related Articles
Russia to Form an Agency to Counter Radio Liberty (Apr. 15, 2002) Archive Access Required
Government Slams Broadcasts by Radio Liberty to Caucasus (Apr. 05, 2002) Archive Access Required
Radio Liberty to Begin Broadcasting in Chechen (Apr. 01, 2002) Archive Access Required
Station Told to Pull Chechen Broadcasts (Feb. 28, 2002) Archive Access Required
U.S. Unsure About Chechen Broadcasts (Feb. 27, 2002) Archive Access Required
Radio Liberty Put on Notice (Jan. 29, 2002) Archive Access Required

Clinton elements at Radio Liberty? Shades of the pro-Kosovo (Albanian Muslims, CNN bias against Serbs et. all, war on Serbia, war on Milosevic instead of Osama during Clinton Admin, et. all) diffusion at Radio Liberty (e.g. thus the constant bias, spin against Russia, the pro-Chechnyan Muslim perspective, e.g. same Leftists in US support Palestinians and Islamic Fascists), perhaps Clintonista moles, or perhaps the like elements within Bush Admin? Islamic Fascists move into Apartments in Russia, then plant bombs and blow up men, women, children, residents - the same will be happening here if we let up on the watch, Russia is facing a threat from such terrorism, of course it could be called "over exaggerated" fear, yet if even one such terrorist act would happen here would we not feel the same? What is the source in the USA of this pro-Islamic de-evolution hidden in the guise of "international" real-politic? Doesn't this ignore another international reality, the coming threat of China and how Islamic Fascists are using/occupying so many of our resources? The United States will need - (1) USA and the American people, (2) Russia, (3) India, and in limited cases Israel to fight these wars ( the present war against terrorism, and the possible threat from China if China move to Pearl Harbor all of East Asia). Why can't we just say it - this isn't a war on terrorism, this (current) war is a war on Islamic Fascism and only because a good portion of Islam has declared war on us? Is it any coincidence that one of the US based Islamic Terrorists recently arrested in Oregon had a name “Patrice Lumumba”, a Congolese Communist and the name of the University in USSR that Communist Angela Davis graduated from? Who marches with the signs “Free Palestine”, “Defranchise Israel”? The Left, the Communists in Berkeley, California, the same cast of characters, and why? Why would the Left support the Islamic Fascists? Because they hate us, hate America, it is as simple as that. It will be no coincidence I think if and when you discover that the artery and convoy for Iraqi Anthrax into the US turns out to be pro-Castro left-wing cells and nut cases in Florida working hand in hand with the Islamic Fascists. It will be no happenstance, nor circumstantial. Why would the Left support a bunch of Middle Age fanatics who would veil women and suffocate Democracy? The answer is simple – because it is only about hate, and they hate America, and it has nothing to do with liberty, fraternity, socialism, or anything. It is really very simple, they are the Enemies of Democracy. Many socialists wore the swastika arm band in the 1930’s and 40’s. Many. They may not wear the arm band today, but have times really changed? They may not wear the arm band today, when they march in their pro-Palestinian parades, or meet at the chambers of the United Nations (U.N.). Of course the Islamic Fascists will use them. Just like they will use modern-day neo-Nazi’s. They have money, and money talks. It talks to the leftists in the street, it talks to the neo-Nazi fringe groups, it blows up buildings, in Russia, in Oklahoma, in the Big Apple. There are many cults in this world. When a cult becomes really big, and organized, maybe it isn’t really called a cult anymore. Like the Democratic Party, for example. That’s a cult.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.