[mrustow]

I just re-read BOTH of your incompatible posts, and see that you know something about SUNY, even though you were wrong about the name of the school, and do not seem to be defending Rosenberg, so much as making petty, incorrect criticisms of the writer.

And so, I am concluding for the moment, that you're basically impossible. And so, I still don't feel that I love you.

Maybe the third time will be the charm.

[Range Rover]

I know a fair amount about the school and I'm NOT criticising the writer at all...not my intent to throw stones at the above-posted article but rather the person under whose byline Rosenberg's employment claims were made.

That it is correctly titled SUNY College at Purchase is news to me. All the persons who I know who went there called it SUNY Purchase, in fact, anyone I have ever discussed the school with has called it SUNY Purchase, so I stand corrected. It's a minor issue in the grand scheme of things, really.

What I was trying to point out is that citing Purchase as the school where she was/is employed would have been a huge red flag to many persons. It was to the writer of the article but not to a LAT writer who - one would assume - do a little background research on his or her subject to suppliment what was written and/or fact check. It points to the innacurate nature of what's being put before us as "news" and the lack of credibility of the person making accusations. That persons in Congress would rely on Rosenberg as an authority on the subject in question is troubling. There is an agenda there and there should not be ANY agenda in the quest for answers in all of this.