Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A person who specializes in internal medicine is an authority on anthrax in Zimbabwe? I think not.
17 posted on 09/04/2002 4:18:24 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee; Alamo-Girl; Lion's Cub
Interesting how all of these people were heavily involved - and cited as 'experts' by the media, in trying to prevent US troops from getting the anthrax vaccine, and how all of these people also happen to be avid supporters of Hussein's regime and well left of center, yet managed to snooker Republicans as well as Democrats and play them like a drum. I used to be critical of the vaccine, but now that I see who is who and how they have been involved in that whole episode, I am now thinking I've been snookered by Hussein too.

Preventing US troops from being protected by that vaccine is extremely convenient for a country which has an interest in making sure we would be vulnerable to the one weapon he has aplenty... biological weapons. Keeping US troops and civilians vulnerable until the time was ripe to make a strike on the US is also rather handy.

More than ever I believe the anthrax cases, and the events of 9/11, lead back to Iraq.

"As with GWS, however, the scientific evidence is so lopsided that Rep. Shays and the media feel compelled to invent experts to oppose the vaccine. One such is Dr. Meryl Nass, who has testified before Rep. Shays's committee. Although dozens of newspapers have identified her as an anthrax-vaccine specialist, she is nothing more than a Maine physician who argues for the existence of GWS and another syndrome the mainstream medical community rejects, multiple chemical sensitivity. She's also a member of the activist, antimilitary group Physicians for Social Responsibility.

Gannett News Service reporter and Pulitzer Prize winner John Hanchette, himself a GWS advocate turned antianthrax-vaccine crusader, calls Nass a "much-published expert on anthrax," failing to mention that her only publication in a major medical or science journal was a letter to the editor. Nass admits that her expertise on anthrax is simply self-learned, but she makes up for it with a loud voice, a sturdy soapbox, and spicy comments that activists and reporters like to hear. She has been made an expert precisely because she says outlandish things that actual experts in the field would never say." - SOURCE

19 posted on 09/04/2002 4:33:40 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson