To: Dog Gone
Don't be surprised when in the next few weeks the White House releases definitive evidence that ties Saddam to not only 9/11, but to the WTC bombing in 1993 and the OKC bombing in 1995.
There will be a lot of people asking why this case was not made a lot sooner, since the National Security Counsel likely knew this by the end of September 2000. My own personal opinion is that the nation was more than a little angry after 9/11 and if it was announced at that time that Iraq was heavily involved, the people would have called for, if not outright demanded, that Bush give the order to nuke Iraq. That demand was harder to make with Afghanistan because lack of any organized government or military. The Taliban were calling the shots in that country, but there just wasn't that much to call the shots over. Plus, it can be argued that Afghanistan was technically occupied by an outsiders, since most of the Taliban were from other countries.
To: Orangedog
Oops, that date should have been September 2001, not 2000.
To: Orangedog
RE: 25.
Interesting hypothesis!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson