Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain blames US for failing world's poor
The Times (U.K.) ^ | 08/26/2002 | Anthony Browne

Posted on 08/25/2002 5:20:23 PM PDT by Pokey78

UN says failure at Earth Summit would fuel global terrorism

Deep tensions between Britain and the US have emerged ahead of the Earth Summit in Johannesburg, which remains shrouded in pessimism ahead of its official start today.

The summit is aimed at reducing world poverty through promoting environmentally sustainable growth, and although it is seen as the most important world summit for years, there are growing concerns that virtually nothing significant will be achieved.

As the gloom deepened in the corridors, it seems many delegates are staying away. Although 65,000 delegates had been predictected to turn up, the UN has downgraded its expectations to just 40,000, and by yesterday only 9,000 delegates and journalists had been accredited.

Last night it also emerged that inspite of the extra 8,000 police on duty, that a shot had been fired at a Swiss delegate in an attempted robbery in a hotel. It followed the earlier robbery on Saturday night of another delegate in a nearby room.

The UK has backed calls from developing countries for targets to reduce the number of people who don’t have access to drinking water, sanitation or electricity. The UN has warned that unless real progress is made, the world will be increasingly divided between haves and have nots, fuelling global terrorism.

However, the US yesterday made clear that it does not want any new targets and will not provide any new money to reduce poverty or help protect the environment. The head of the US delegation John Turner said yesterday: “We don’t see the need for any new targets.”

Although 100 world leaders have said they will attend the summit, President Bush has said he will not attend. The head of the British delegation, the Environment Secretary Margaret Beckett, yesterday showed growing frustration with American intransigence, which could derail the summit. She said: “It’s true that the American government is not doing as much as we would all like to see it do, but that’s doesn’t mean there aren’t lots of people in America who take these issues just as seriously as they deserve”.

“We very much want to see targets on issues like sanitation. We hope to pursuade our American friends to agree to some of the targets” she added.

After a year of talks, no agreement has been reached on more than a quarter of the negotiating text, and there is concern that positions are now so entrenched that it will be impossible to reach any meaningful agreement in the ten days of the summit. One UN official warned that failure to resvolve outstanding issues could render the summit useless, and said they were not optimistic about progress.

“We hope to make some headway by the start of the summit. So far, what we forsee is a complete disaster” he said.

South Africa’s deputy foreign minister Aziz Pahad, insisted that while he was confident that common ground could be reached, “it would be romantic to assume that there would be absolute consensus at such a large-diverse conference.”

Tony Juniper, director-designate of Friends of the Earth, said that there was now little chance of the summit achieving anything significant. “I think it’s looking like we’re going to get a pretty modest set of outcomes. It’s clear that we’re going to get no legally binding targets” he said. Friends of the Earth has been very critical of Tony Blair’s decision to attend the summit for just one day.

Mr Blair also came under attack from his most senior environment adviser, Jonathan Porritt, who said he didn’t give environmental issues the priority they deserve. Yesterday Mrs Beckett defended the Prime Minister, saying he had been fully involved in the summit. “The idea that all he brings to the summit is the time he spends here is crazy. He’s been working on it for 18 months - he’s been engaged and involved in it all the way through” she said.

Mrs Beckett also insisted that it would be a disaster if the delegates let the growing row with Zimbabwe’s President, Robert Mugabe, to overshadow the summit. Mr Blair had been facing calls to boycott a speach by Mr Mugabe, who will be attending the summit at the same time as Mr Blair. “The most important and crucial thing is to make sure the summit is not dominated by the issue of Robert Mugabe. There is nothing President Mugabe would like better than to think a whole world summit has been hijacked by his behaviour and his concerns” said Mrs Beckett.

The start of the summit has already been overshadowed by the highly televised clash between protestors and police in the centre of Johannesbug. Activists claimed that police, who fired stun grenades at a candle-lit demonstration which included children, were being heavy handed. However, Johannesburg’s Police Director Happy Schutter defended their action, saying that the marchers had not obtained permission. “We had to show them we wouldn’t let this happen during the summit. If they want to march they must get permission” he said.

The South African government has been worried that the summit could be as disrupted by protests as earlier summits such as Genoa, and have drafted in tens of thousands of police from surrounding areas. The Sandton City shopping and hotel complex has been cordoned off to outsiders, with incredibly tight security both surrounding it and inside. The organisers have been worried about actions by terrorists since this is the first meeting of world leaders since September 11th, and is taking place just before the anniversary of the attack on the US.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2002 5:20:23 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
U.N want a tax on America
2 posted on 08/25/2002 5:24:57 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Johannesburg Summit 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development Watch it
3 posted on 08/25/2002 5:27:25 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Cute for a country that just LOVED Imperialism...
4 posted on 08/25/2002 5:28:20 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I thought Ted Turner was to blame...Ted Turner Cuts Payments
5 posted on 08/25/2002 5:33:45 PM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Catherine Day, deputy director at the European Commission, said Ashe's text, which axes several disputed sections from the 77-page draft, was a "good basis for discussion" and denied it was toning down environmental concerns.

"We feel it's a very positive step," echoed John Turner, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for international environmental affairs.

The text toned down earlier drafts that spoke of the possible dangers of globalization -- poor nations fear that liberalization could mean that rich corporations will swamp their vulnerable economies.

Another part of Ashe's draft partly meets developing nations' worries by urging rich nations to make "concrete efforts" to raise aid to them to 0.7 percent of their income. They now give about 0.22 percent, or $67 a year from each person in the developed world, down from 0.33 percent a decade ago.

6 posted on 08/25/2002 5:34:13 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I have little doubt that the "conclusion" of the Earth Summit will be nothing less than a declaration of war on the USA -- however it might be phrased.
7 posted on 08/25/2002 5:35:26 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
As the gloom deepened in the corridors, it seems many delegates are staying away. Although 65,000 delegates had been predictected to turn up, the UN has downgraded its expectations to just 40,000, and by yesterday only 9,000 delegates and journalists had been accredited.

LOL. The UN socialists' pipe dreams are collapsing like a house of cards. Thank you President Bush for staying in Crawford. You are doing much good by not attending.

8 posted on 08/25/2002 5:35:29 PM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA21
>Every one of the nations in the U.N. has a national government.
>The good people of Botswana should turn to the government of Botswana to solve their problems, NOT US. >If their government isn't up to the task then they need to replace it with one that is.
>If there is more terror, then we will clean out the rat's nests one by one, and maybe that will solve the overpopulation problem.
9 posted on 08/25/2002 5:35:38 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
As the gloom deepened in the corridors, it seems many delegates are staying away. Although 65,000 delegates had been predictected to turn up, the UN has downgraded its expectations to just 40,000, and by yesterday only 9,000 delegates and journalists had been accredited.

LOL. The UN socialists' pipe dreams are collapsing like a house of cards. Thank you President Bush for staying in Crawford. You are doing much good by not attending.

10 posted on 08/25/2002 5:36:12 PM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I'd tell this to the Brits: bloody mind your own soggin' business. And what its worth, if we're really failing the world's poor, why it is so many all the world risk life and limb to come to America? What a bunch of morons. And the U.N is nothing more than a paid advertisement for socialists, poverty pimps, black racists, radical Islamists, and enviro wackos. I'm glad our President isn't there to legitimize that motley band of anti-American misfits.
11 posted on 08/25/2002 5:38:23 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I hope a lot more "delegates" get robbed. This is wealth transfer in action. From the overstuffed, lobster eating, FIRST world to the SKINNY THIRD world.

You have no idea the buffets the UN/World Bank/IMF throw at such shindigs.
12 posted on 08/25/2002 5:42:15 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
And my equally adolescent retort:

US blames Britain for failing the World

13 posted on 08/25/2002 5:44:36 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Pokey78
The U.S. has done more to help the world's poor than the UK and all of Europe put together.
What a bunch of friggin ingrates.
15 posted on 08/25/2002 5:52:39 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

16 posted on 08/25/2002 5:56:12 PM PDT by Militiaman7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Seems to me that for the cost of this fiasco they could feed a lot of hungry Africans.
17 posted on 08/25/2002 6:02:21 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
“We very much want to see targets on issues like sanitation. We hope to pursuade our American friends to agree to some of the targets” she added.

Translation: "We very much wanted to place an additional burden on the United States to worry its global primacy. We had hoped that US would shoulder even more of the responsibility for bringing these third-world flytraps out of the dark ages, even though these nations' repeated failures to achieve even basic cultural stability is a product of their own ineptitude and corruption. Promoting capitalism within their borders would be labeled economic imperialism, so that only leaves one "solution:" an endless conveyor belt of money that falls into these black holes, always accompanied by demands for even more money."

18 posted on 08/25/2002 6:24:47 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
It occurs to me that the best possible outcome of this conference would be for all 60,000 of these parasites and despots to be lined up against a wall and shot dead.

Nothing this conference could propose, and certainly no proposal that has a prayer of being implemented, would do as much for the starving masses of the Third World as removing the burden of this statist filth from their backs.

-ccm

19 posted on 08/25/2002 6:40:18 PM PDT by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"Are there no prisons?" asked Scrooge.

"Plenty of prisons," said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.

"And the Union workhouses?" demanded Scrooge. "Are they still in operation?"

"They are. Still," returned the gentleman, "I wish I could say they were not."

"The Treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?" said Scrooge.

"Both very busy, sir."

"Oh! I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course," said Scrooge. "I'm very glad to hear it."

20 posted on 08/25/2002 6:47:33 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson