Unearthed, The Prince Of Stonehenge

The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 8-26-2002 | Roger Highfield

[blam]

"This artist has drawn The Amesbury Archer to look like a modern white Celtic man, much like any other white European/American man today, so the artist apparently views the Amesbury Archer as a Hebrew.

Thanks.

[philman_36]

To begin, Abrahams offspring are white, or "Causasian".
The "White Supremacists" are gonna be ticked at that line of reasoning. They won't take the Jewish part too well. LOL

[LostTribe]

That's right. But then, they are ticked at any line of REASONING! {ggg}. The obvious totally escapes them.

[Aracelis]

Of interest...

[PaulKersey]

Wait until the "White Supremacists" discover they are also semites. Guffaw!

[philman_36]

Wait until the "White Supremacists" discover they are also semites. Guffaw!
The whole movement down the drain!

[philman_36]

But then, they are ticked at any line of REASONING!
True, true...

[Doctor Stochastic]

So, his farm has been in the family for 4500 years?

[mamelukesabre]

"These Jews, which everyone agrees are Hebrews/Semites/Israelites just happen to look like and could easily be confused with their Israelite cousins, European and American whites who are of Celtic origin."


Ever heard of the vikings? They are nordic, not celtic. Teutonic and gallic are not the same, even though in modern day england, the two are mixed and indestinguishable.

[LostTribe]

Most British Israelites, White Supremists and others make the mistake of thinking there are no Jews, only Khazarites.  They find Israelites from the Northern Kingdom in Britain and American and think those are only true remaining Israelites.

Most Jews OTOH think there are no Lost Tribes of Israel.  They think the huge Northern Kingdom was assimilated into the South.  They don't recognize that only a few Israelites were ever called Jews, the vast majority existing today as white Europeans and Americans.

The truth lies between them, but few on either side can see it.

[justshutupandtakeit]

bttt

[LostTribe]

>Ever heard of the vikings?

Are you serious, or just trying to be silly?

>They are nordic, not celtic. Teutonic and gallic are not the same,
even though in modern day england, the two are mixed and indestinguishable.

The Nordics and Gauls are not exactly the same, just as Dutch and Flemish are not exactly the same.  But ALL are Celtic.  Members of the 12 Tribes of Israel were not exactly the same, but they were all Israelites.

Please read the 3-MINUTE HISTORY by clicking on my LostTribe Profile below for the details, and to read a short list of the many Celtic tribes which make up todays Europe and America.

[nopardons]

Your posts are always fascinating ; thank you. :-)

[McGavin999]

5'9"? That's pretty tall for an ancient, isn't it?

[mamelukesabre]

Thanks for the lesson. I've never before heard that the nordics are related to the gauls. And to be frank(pun intended), I don't yet beleive you. I will be looking into this. I knew that the celts of the british isles were somehow descended(sp?) of the gauls. And I have heard the theory that the first european celts somehow came from semites that were in the anatolian peninsula and were thought to be one of the lost tribes. THis much I have accepted as probable.

Now, I have one more race for you to explain. The slavs. They are neither gallic nor teutonic and as far as I know, they are not related to neither the celts nor the nordics. I suppose you are going to tell me these too are semites and are the same as celts and nordics?

[LostTribe]

>Thanks for the lesson. 
My pleasure.

>I've never before heard that the nordics are related to the gauls. And to be frank(pun intended), I don't yet beleive you. I will be looking into this.

Good for you.  The more we study you more we learn.

>I knew that the celts of the british isles were somehow descended(sp?) of the gauls. And I have heard the theory that the first european celts somehow came from semites that were in the anatolian peninsula and were thought to be one of the lost tribes. THis much I have accepted as probable.

If you really want to cut through the haze get right on top of the subject, go to the 20,000+ Assyrian tablets now in the British Museum.  It will change your whole perspective on the population of Europe, as well as how the Old Testament really reads.  If you go to the link at my FR Profile by clicking on LostTribe below and looking for Assyrian Tablets, that author has done an excellent job of bringing those Assyrian Tablets to life in a small and inexpensive but very readible book.  You will never view history the same.

>Now, I have one more race for you to explain. The slavs..... I suppose you are going to tell me these too are semites and are the same as celts and nordics?

Ha!  Nope.  The Slavs are not the same as the Celts.

[LostTribe]

>5'9"? That's pretty tall for an ancient, isn't it?

For which ancients? There are lots of artifacts and records which indicate that is not out of line for Israelites/Celts, both males and females. Neither was 6' way out of line, but neither was it common. For other races, perhaps it was.

[LostTribe]

>Your posts are always fascinating ; thank you. :-)

Thank You for the note. It is appreciated!

[nopardons]

:-)

[LostTribe]

Here's a link to the book on the Assyrian Tablets in the British Museum which I mentioned.