Kirk and Hunter were spot on when describing homosexuals in their book After the Ball:
• The authors say gays tend to deny reality in various ways: wishful thinking, paranoia, illogic, emotionalism and embracing crackpot ideas.
Your attempt to smear Scott Whiteman is so typical of the way the homosexual community operates -- scream "hate speech" or "homophobe" and throw out wild, baseless accusations. While you are entitled to your opinion, it's important to note that the lesbian activist author of the "Context Matters" web page didn't make similiar accusations.
Here's what the Context Matters web page has to say:
Anonymous Question Cards
They then decided to do anonymous question cards, a back-up exercise they had come prepared with. These cards provide youth the opportunity to ask questions they have without risking judgement from their peers or adults for the content of the questions. Anonymous question cards also help guarantee that the material being asked is the students' agenda rather than the adults. (emphasis added)
Ms. Ables provided me with a list of the questions they asked, which she had typed up because the teachers who were present at the next workshop felt it important to know what gay youth wanted to know.
[The list of questions appear on the Context Matters web page...]
The procedure for this exercise was to read the questions in the order they arrived in on the pile of question cards, to turn the question back to the group so peers could do some of the education, and then to add, clarify, or correct any misinformation."
Since this was a back-up exercise the instructors admit they had come prepared with, a more likely scenario is that one or both of the presenters (Gaucher and Ables) wanted the children to be introduced to the topic of "Fisting" and planted the "anonymous" question card themselves.
* "There's historic precedence of Radical Right operatives attending presentations and asking embarrassing questions... there's even historic precedence for the "fisting" question being used." *
And I'm sure you have documentation from yet another homosexual web site to "prove" your wild, homosexist accusations.
* "Finally, if you look at the list of questions that were asked, most of them display an almost amusing kind of quasi-naiveté. But when compared to virtually all the other questions, the "fisting" shows a businesslike directness... the sign of an adult mind at work, in my opinion." *
Ok then, since you insist, let's look at the questions as posted on the "Context Matters" web page:
"Ms. Ables provided me with a list of the questions they asked, which she had typed up because the teachers who were present at the next workshop felt it important to know what gay youth wanted to know."
"These are typed as written originally by the students.
- Is oral sex better with tongue rings? P.S. I hope so.
- Cum? Calories? Spit versus swallow? Health concerns?
- What age do most GLB first have sex? Is it different from the age of straight kids?
- What is an anal ball?
- Should some kind of protection be used in lesbian sex?
- Women’s vaginal wall can expand to any dick size… Can anal walls do the same?
- Are girls who primarily like guys and are only attracted to other girls sexually (not in the love-y) way considered bisexual?
- How is protection used in lesbian sex since it’s mostly oral, where does the protection go?
- My ex said she enjoys pain, what the hell is that about?
- What is fisting?
- Define fetish.
- What is lesbian sex anyway?
- How do I find out if someone is bi? Homo?
- What are the technicalities of transsexual and hermaphrodite sex?
- How long do you have to wait to get tested for HIV or any STD after the "act" is committed?
- A question on the ethics of oral sex: would it be considered rude not to swallow?
- Can you answer the fish question?
- Do lesbians rub their clits together? Is that even sex?
- How do GLB kids determine loss of virginity?"
The question asked about fisting was simply, "What is fisting?". I'm having a difficult time seeing how this question "shows a businesslike directness... the sign of an adult mind at work" when compared to the other questions asked. Perhaps you can clear that up for me?
* "Until then we’ll have to assume that the question was asked because someone in the room wanted it answered. And answered it was." *
I think it's obvious to anyone who listens to the "Fistgate" tape" just who wanted the question answered. The conference instructors had their agenda. And we've heard exactly how they answered the question.
BTW, you've stated that the workshop was illegally recorded - that is not true. There have been no criminal charges filed against Scott Whiteman or Brian Camenker. The civil suit you spoke of was instigated by the legal aid group "Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders" as reported in the July 3/July 10 print edition of "The Weekly Standard" (Banned in Boston - Better not complain about the gay agenda for Massachusetts schools, page 17).