Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NonZeroSum
It's not the cost of the energy, it the cost of turning the energy into altitude and velocity that hurts. The Space Shuttle's actual fuel cost is well below 1% of the total launch cost.
9 posted on 08/19/2002 9:47:04 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: John Jamieson
But the point of the space elevator is that it reduces the cost of transportation to a little above the basic energy costs, so I don't understand your original comment.
11 posted on 08/19/2002 10:37:31 PM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: John Jamieson
You're right. The energy required to accelerate one kg to escape velocity is approximately 18 kilowatt-hours. For that much electricity, you'd typically pay about two dollars (well, maybe 20 in California).

Chemical rockets are very, very inefficient.

14 posted on 08/20/2002 1:11:38 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson