Posted on 08/07/2002 4:41:53 PM PDT by Dog Gone
LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Scientists have overestimated the potential of trees and shrubs to soak up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, according to a new study.
The reassessment casts doubt on whether planting trees is always a positive step in the fight against global warming, as President Bush and others have suggested.
In the study, published in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature, Duke University scientists say trees and shrubs growing in areas of abundant rainfall are less effective storehouses for carbon than native grasslands they have steadily replaced across much of the western United States.
Vegetation stores carbon that otherwise might trap heat in the atmosphere, driving up temperatures and leading to climate change. Previous studies have ignored what was going on below ground, said Robert Jackson lead author of the study and an associate professor of biology at Duke University.
In wet locations, replacing grass with shrubs and trees actually can lead to a decrease in the amount of carbon locked up in organic matter mixed in the soil, Jackson said. The amount can be enough to offset any gains achieved above ground.
``The study suggests that we need to look very closely at what's below ground before we add up just what's stored above ground in tree trunks,'' Jackson said.
Scientists studied six pairs of adjacent western grasslands. In one of each pair, trees and shrubs had cropped up sometime in the last 100 years.
In the drier sites, the invasive growth led to an increase in the amount of carbon locked up in the soil. In wetter areas, however, the opposite was the case, Jackson said. It is not clear what caused the change.
``Grasses are deceptively productive,'' Jackson said. ``You don't see where all the carbon goes so there is a misconception that woody species store more carbon. That's just not always the case.''
Previously, studies estimated that U.S. shrublands contain about 440 million tons of carbon. The number may be closer to 280 million tons, Jackson said.
That result suggests shrublands, by absorbing carbon from the atmosphere, do less to balance emissions from the burning of fossil fuels than previously thought, Jackson said.
``It would not surprise me at all if they were absolutely spot-on right,'' said Steve Pacala, a Princeton University professor ecology, who wasn't involved in the study. However, he said he didn't consider the study definitive, given uncertainties in its measurements of the carbon contained in woody roots.
The study helps dispel the notion that humans can plant their way out of global warming, said Daniel Becker, director of the Sierra Club global warming and energy program.
``We are going to need to tackle the industrial sources of emissions head-on rather than just plant a bunch of trees,'' Becker said.
As part of his administration's strategy for curtailing carbon dioxide emissions, Bush has proposed tax incentives for farmers who plant trees.
The rain forest actually uses more oxygen then it produces.
a.cricket
Ahhh. The true adgenda rears its ugly head. Let's end all the rich people/countries because we hate them.
"A tree is a tree. How many more do you have to look at?"
Reagan '66, opposing expansion of Redwood National Park
Trees cause pollution after all – Reagan vindicated January 11, 2001
Plant trees anyway.
Pay attention, this is serious. To make a meaningful reduction in industrial emissions, move the industries off-earth and use sun power there in space. Moving aluminum smelting alone would cut power generation needs substantially. In fact, the problem, whether real or imagined, would disappear overnight.
a.cricket
I'm still trying to figure out how to keep it mowed.
Got it covered. No problem.
I think we've finally come to see
That trees aren't what we thought they'd be.
They aren't bad in the nursery,
But old ones aren't that good.
Our lives are like that, I would say,
You're in demand until the day,
Your age and wage drive jobs away,
And then you're packed in wood.
Actually you can feed an infant with regular chopsticks. I used to do that when I was stationed in Thailand with my family, including a two-year-old boy.
On the One True Newsgroup[tm], alt.pave.the.earth, you will meet with like-minded individuals who are taking positive action to improve the quality of life for drivers everywhere. Simply, the whole surface of the Earth must be paved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.