Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH: NINE FORMER PRESIDENTS WRONG; CLINTON RIGHT!
Mountain States Legal Foundation ^ | August 1, 2002 | William Perry Pendley

Posted on 08/03/2002 12:05:07 PM PDT by Action-America

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
Wow!

Dubya is supporting Slick Willie's socialist policy over that of three Supreme Court Rulings and nine other presidents, including his own daddy and Ronald Reagan!

Can you say turncoat?

 

1 posted on 08/03/2002 12:05:07 PM PDT by Action-America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Principled; Bigun; pigdog; weikel; ancient_geezer; Free the USA; Libertarianize the GOP; ...
Heads Up!
2 posted on 08/03/2002 12:24:37 PM PDT by Action-America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *SCOTUS_List; *landgrab; madfly
Index Bump
3 posted on 08/03/2002 12:29:46 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
Reinforces the theory that our lands (and therefore minerals) are being used to secure the national debt.
4 posted on 08/03/2002 12:49:24 PM PDT by droberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
Another thought is that, if they can dismantle Supreme Court's ruling that easily, what can't Bush to the same for the Second Amendment (assuming he has a real interest in restoring it, which I doubt).
5 posted on 08/03/2002 12:51:38 PM PDT by droberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Confederate Keyester
The socialist version of the communist "nationalization" of the means of production. THE STATE exerting its ownership of public lands... instead of holding them in trust for the people and businesses that ARE the true landlords.

Interesting article.
7 posted on 08/03/2002 1:17:25 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
Compassionate socialism. Answer this: If you knew what a disapointment Bush turned out to be, would you ever have voted for him in the first place. Lets get this thing out of the White House in 2004.
8 posted on 08/03/2002 1:26:33 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
You do not like President Bush - sorry. Knowing what I know today, I would vote for him again. Chances are I will vote for him in the next election.

Does that answer your question.

9 posted on 08/03/2002 1:31:47 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
He is NOT a turncoat.

He is a LIBERAL!
10 posted on 08/03/2002 1:32:24 PM PDT by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
"and no assessment work was performed during the 46 year period stretching from July 1, 1931 to Sept. 1, 1977."
11 posted on 08/03/2002 1:35:50 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
If you knew what a disapointment Bush turned out to be, would you ever have voted for him in the first place.

Hell NO!

Gore wouldn't have been as successful in advancing this agenda.
12 posted on 08/03/2002 1:36:33 PM PDT by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
Why do I smell another DU propaganda infiltration piece that's going to get flyswatted by the end of the day?
13 posted on 08/03/2002 1:42:14 PM PDT by Wondervixen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
Now wait a minute. What are these keywords about?

SOPHOMORIC POSTER; YAWN;

It looks to me like someone has hijacked John's account.

J

14 posted on 08/03/2002 1:43:16 PM PDT by J. L. Chamberlain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wondervixen
Why do I smell another DU propaganda infiltration piece that's going to get flyswatted by the end of the day?

BINGO

15 posted on 08/03/2002 1:45:02 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
I doubt that you know much about this subject, so let me fill you in:

The State of Utah wants to set the the San Rafael Swell aside by having the feds designate it. You should know how Bush is about State's Rights and local control.

16 posted on 08/03/2002 1:45:53 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
Answer this: If you knew what a disapointment Bush turned out to be, would you ever have voted for him in the first place.

I didn't. And I won't.I was given 4 choices on the ballot. Bush, Gore, Nader or Browne. I voted for Browne.

When Bush was elected I hoped he would be better than Gore.

He isn't. Gore would not have gotten away with what Bush has done and is doing.

17 posted on 08/03/2002 1:48:20 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Satadru

If you knew what a disappointment Bush turned out to be, would you ever have voted for him in the first place. Lets get this thing out of the White House in 2004.

As difficult as it was for me, being a lifelong GOP activist, I didn't vote for him.  I found it necessary to vote for Harry Browne, not because I agreed with everything that he stood for (I actually disagreed with him on a number of issues), but because Browne was by far, the closest thing to a conservative in the race.  Being from Texas, I had ample opportunity to see Dubya at work before he became the darling of the GOP can do no wrong crowd and was therefore, well aware of Dubya's left-leaning tendency.

If the GOP doesn't find a better candidate for President soon, the Democrats won't have to worry about fielding a good candidate in 2004, because if Dubya wins, the Democrats win by default.

 

18 posted on 08/03/2002 2:13:29 PM PDT by Action-America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
a dubious regulation adopted because of the anti-mining zealotry of William Jefferson Clinton?

I wonder... didn't x42 shut down US low sulpher coal fields, a move that basically helps the Ryady (sp.?) family with their Asian low sulpher coal? While Bushie might appear to be siding with Clinton, it is probably for different reasons. Maybe Cliff's Synfuel was just going to sit on the rights rather than develop it...needs more research.

19 posted on 08/03/2002 2:25:19 PM PDT by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
Tancredo for President 2004!
20 posted on 08/03/2002 2:27:51 PM PDT by bok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson