Of the people who actually ran for President, and had a real chance to be ellected (that excludes fringe kooks like the Libertarians), who do you think would be handling the greatest crisis since 1962 any better than Bush and his team?
Just curious.
Of the people who actually ran for President, and had a real chance to be ellected (that excludes fringe kooks like the Libertarians), who do you think would be handling the greatest crisis since 1962 any better than Bush and his team? That's just like saying that your house has a few less termites than your neighbor's house.
The fact that Bush was the more palatable candidate in 2000 doesn't change the fact that he's dropping the ball now.