Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeneD
This is a very bad idea.

The military should never be used for domestic law enforcement.

17 posted on 07/21/2002 10:04:34 AM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mulder
"The military should never be used for domestic law enforcement."

Think about what you are saying! Do you think the police are equipped or adequately trained to protect our canals, power plants, reservoirs, nuclear power facilities, the power distribution grid, refineries, and dams? You will need the military to protect these if this war really takes hold as expected. Let's not make foolish decisions.

44 posted on 07/21/2002 10:37:03 AM PDT by NetValue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
The military should never be used for domestic law enforcement

What is the definition of is?

Does domestic refer to the location of the arrest or the nationality of the suspect.

Defining domestic as pertaining to location would seem to preclude the defense of the nation if foreign invaders could get a foot on US soil. Seems to me that this legislation is redundent since our military already posses the power that Ridge et al are seeking.

59 posted on 07/21/2002 10:54:21 AM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
"The military should never be used for domestic law enforcement."

Actually, I suspect they CAN be used today, and legally, IF they are used in conjunction with the local law enforcement authorities. IF the local Sheriff is along, he can "deputize" them as needed to take the necessary actions.

No expansion of "military powers of arrest" is necessary or desirable.

155 posted on 07/21/2002 3:21:22 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson