Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wimpzillas (particle 1000 billion times more massive than proton) leave tracks say astronomers
New Scientist ^ | 12:30 03 June 02 | Anil Ananthaswamy

Posted on 06/10/2002 11:17:08 AM PDT by dead

An army of monster Wimpzillas is hiding out in our Galaxy and Earth is under attack. Fantastical as these beasts sound, they could solve two mysteries that have been plaguing physicists for years: the source of the Universe's missing mass, and the origin of the most powerful cosmic rays hitting our planet.

Physicists have worked out that most matter in the Universe must be made up of "dark matter" we cannot see, otherwise galaxies wouldn't have enough gravitational pull to hold themselves together. So far, the most likely candidates for dark matter are WIMPs, or weakly interacting massive particles, that have 50 to 100 times the mass of a proton. The trouble is, no one has ever detected one.

That may be because WIMPS, by definition, tend to pass straight through ordinary matter. Or dark matter might be made of something else. In 1999, Edward Kolb of the Enrico Fermi Institute in Chicago and his colleagues proposed another candidate particle that would have been created just after the big bang. The tremendous energies would have created particles 10 billion times the mass of WIMPs, so the researchers named these behemoths Wimpzillas.

"Although they have a weird name, Wimpzillas are among the most reasonable of current speculative ideas in the field," says Angela Olinto, also of the Enrico Fermico Institute. And if Wimpzillas exist, they would explain another puzzle: where do ultra-high energy cosmic rays come from?

Wimpzilla annihilation

These beams of particles bombard Earth from space. Their energies are too high for them to have travelled from a distant source, so they must have been created close by, but astrophysicists have no idea what in our neighbourhood could have caused them.

The annihilation or decay of Wimpzillas would create such high-energy particles says Kolb, along with Pasquale Blasi of the Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory in Florence, Italy, and Rainer Dick of the University of Saskatchewan in Canada, in a paper to be published in the journal Astroparticle Physics. As this superheavy dark matter would exist in our Galaxy, the particles could easily reach Earth.

While WIMPs have been impossible to detect, finding their heavier counterparts should be easier. The researchers have calculated that if ultra-high-energy cosmic rays are made by Wimpzillas, they should be composed mainly of gamma rays, rather than protons or atomic nuclei. And it should soon be possible to check this.

The next generation of cosmic-ray detectors such as the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina and the Extreme Universe Space Observatory, which will be deployed on the International Space Station, will be able to peer into the centre of our Galaxy.

If Blasi and his colleagues are right, they expect to see gamma rays streaming out from the centre of the Galaxy, as Wimpzillas should be there in abundance. "It could revolutionise our understanding of basic physics in this century," says Dick.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: anilananthaswamy; crevolist; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Pinlighter
Rather a confused article, I think

You mean "Enrico Fermico" wasn't his real name?

21 posted on 06/10/2002 1:44:29 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
That was the name of the company he started. 8)
22 posted on 06/10/2002 1:49:28 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dead
I swear these guys sit around drinking coffe and making this stuff up!
23 posted on 06/10/2002 1:49:56 PM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'm beginning to think that the true "wimpzillas" are
the taxpayers who tolerate the funding of this crap.
24 posted on 06/10/2002 1:53:09 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
But we haven't imaged the sources of the distant cosmic rays. We just catch the strays; as far as we can tell, their distribution is isotropic. Using your argument, this means that the sources must be very distant, else we would have associated them with an obvious optical source, or at least detected some anisotropy.
25 posted on 06/10/2002 1:54:28 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dead
Cool - but the word sounds like the name of an open source browser or a MP3 player.

Download WIMPZILLA 1.0 now!

26 posted on 06/10/2002 1:58:41 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Could also be an drive-time afternoon Zoo disc jockey.
27 posted on 06/10/2002 2:18:44 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
There are 4 things this fat slob will never see 1. the correct side of any issue. 2. A limit to Big Brother powers in Wash.DC. And the other TWO are his feet!!
28 posted on 06/10/2002 2:43:33 PM PDT by GeorgeHL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
ALERT! ALERT! this is a picture of Nadzilla the monster who swallowed the Nations Capitol.
29 posted on 06/10/2002 2:45:41 PM PDT by GeorgeHL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dead
OK, scientists if you want to call God "Wimpzillas," I can live with that.
30 posted on 06/10/2002 3:18:01 PM PDT by 3catsanadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead;dighton;Orual;Lazamataz;Travis McGee;harpseal;Squantos;PatrickHenry
Wimpzillas (particle 1000 billion times more massive than proton) leave tracks say astronomers

And my wife JUST mopped the space-time continuum, dagnabit! Someone tell these Wimpzillas to wipe their feet!

31 posted on 06/10/2002 3:20:09 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"We need to send someone to see these Wimpzillas !"

If I'm chosen to go, I'll need at least a two week notice before departing.

32 posted on 06/10/2002 3:52:15 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
A Google search on "Wimpzilla" turns up 67 hits. I've scanned a few (not a great way to absorb such material) and in this very limited form of research I've found no suggestion of a nearby wimpzilla source. The consensus, if there is such a thing here, is that they may be products of the very early universe.
33 posted on 06/10/2002 3:55:42 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I've found no suggestion of a nearby wimpzilla source.

I took the "nearby source" comment to mean a nearby source for ultra high-energy cosmic rays (protons, gammas, what have you). The idea here is that the most energetic particles would be generated not by astrophysical sources, but by the (comparatively nearby) annihilation or decay of wimpzillas, which--having gigantic rest mass energies--impart huge kinetic energies to the daughter particles.

I'm still trying to figure out the argument against high-energy cosmic rays travelling long distances. Perhaps they would collide with CMBR photons, a sort of cosmic laser-cooling process. The wimpzillas themselves would be transparent to photons, and not be subject to this. Just a thought.

I sure hate the term "wimpzilla". It's as moronic as it is oxymoronic. How about a "Weakly interacting Horribly Obese Massive Particles" (WHOMPs)?

34 posted on 06/10/2002 4:31:04 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 3catsanadog
OK, scientists if you want to call God "Wimpzillas," I can live with that.

Just as long as you don't mind us calculating and measuring a complete description of His properties.

35 posted on 06/10/2002 4:33:55 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
A Google search on "Wimpzilla" turns up 67 hits.

Googlewhack fodder. I got one on my very first try: "wimpzilla chocolate".

36 posted on 06/10/2002 4:36:20 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
"wimpzilla chocolate"

"unmeasurable WHOMP"

37 posted on 06/10/2002 4:48:29 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
How about a "Weakly interacting Horribly Obese Massive Particles" (WHOMPs)?

How about BLIMPs? Bloated Lethargically Interacting Massive Particles

38 posted on 06/10/2002 5:30:30 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I've found no suggestion of a nearby wimpzilla source.

You know, that's the way it always is. There's a niche market for something, and then suddenly it catches on and becomes a big fad. Then when the fad dies down, the old reliable wimpzilla purveyors are dragged down with it, and the serious consumers of wimpzillae have to drive to the next state just to get any. And of course the quality has gone way downhill.

39 posted on 06/10/2002 5:37:38 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
And of course the quality has gone way downhill.

Ain't it the truth? Entropy just isn't what it used to be.

40 posted on 06/10/2002 5:47:53 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson