Skip to comments.
Wimpzillas (particle 1000 billion times more massive than proton) leave tracks say astronomers
New Scientist ^
| 12:30 03 June 02
| Anil Ananthaswamy
Posted on 06/10/2002 11:17:08 AM PDT by dead
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Pinlighter
Rather a confused article, I think You mean "Enrico Fermico" wasn't his real name?
21
posted on
06/10/2002 1:44:29 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: r9etb
That was the name of the company he started. 8)
22
posted on
06/10/2002 1:49:28 PM PDT
by
dead
To: dead
I swear these guys sit around drinking coffe and making this stuff up!
23
posted on
06/10/2002 1:49:56 PM PDT
by
CaptRon
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'm beginning to think that the true "wimpzillas" are
the taxpayers who tolerate the funding of this crap.
To: r9etb
But we haven't imaged the sources of the distant cosmic rays. We just catch the strays; as far as we can tell, their distribution is isotropic. Using your argument, this means that the sources must be very distant, else we would have associated them with an obvious optical source, or at least detected some anisotropy.
To: dead
Cool - but the word sounds like the name of an open source browser or a MP3 player.
Download WIMPZILLA 1.0 now!
To: Senator Pardek
Could also be an drive-time afternoon Zoo disc jockey.
27
posted on
06/10/2002 2:18:44 PM PDT
by
dead
To: PatrickHenry
There are 4 things this fat slob will never see 1. the correct side of any issue. 2. A limit to Big Brother powers in Wash.DC. And the other TWO are his feet!!
28
posted on
06/10/2002 2:43:33 PM PDT
by
GeorgeHL
To: PatrickHenry
ALERT! ALERT! this is a picture of Nadzilla the monster who swallowed the Nations Capitol.
29
posted on
06/10/2002 2:45:41 PM PDT
by
GeorgeHL
To: dead
OK, scientists if you want to call God "Wimpzillas," I can live with that.
To: dead;dighton;Orual;Lazamataz;Travis McGee;harpseal;Squantos;PatrickHenry
Wimpzillas (particle 1000 billion times more massive than proton) leave tracks say astronomersAnd my wife JUST mopped the space-time continuum, dagnabit! Someone tell these Wimpzillas to wipe their feet!
31
posted on
06/10/2002 3:20:09 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"We need to send someone to see these Wimpzillas !" If I'm chosen to go, I'll need at least a two week notice before departing.
32
posted on
06/10/2002 3:52:15 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Physicist
A Google search on "Wimpzilla" turns up 67 hits. I've scanned a few (not a great way to absorb such material) and in this very limited form of research I've found no suggestion of a nearby wimpzilla source. The consensus, if there is such a thing here, is that they may be products of the very early universe.
To: PatrickHenry
I've found no suggestion of a nearby wimpzilla source. I took the "nearby source" comment to mean a nearby source for ultra high-energy cosmic rays (protons, gammas, what have you). The idea here is that the most energetic particles would be generated not by astrophysical sources, but by the (comparatively nearby) annihilation or decay of wimpzillas, which--having gigantic rest mass energies--impart huge kinetic energies to the daughter particles.
I'm still trying to figure out the argument against high-energy cosmic rays travelling long distances. Perhaps they would collide with CMBR photons, a sort of cosmic laser-cooling process. The wimpzillas themselves would be transparent to photons, and not be subject to this. Just a thought.
I sure hate the term "wimpzilla". It's as moronic as it is oxymoronic. How about a "Weakly interacting Horribly Obese Massive Particles" (WHOMPs)?
To: 3catsanadog
OK, scientists if you want to call God "Wimpzillas," I can live with that. Just as long as you don't mind us calculating and measuring a complete description of His properties.
To: PatrickHenry
A Google search on "Wimpzilla" turns up 67 hits. Googlewhack fodder. I got one on my very first try: "wimpzilla chocolate".
To: Physicist
"wimpzilla chocolate""unmeasurable WHOMP"
To: Physicist
How about a "Weakly interacting Horribly Obese Massive Particles" (WHOMPs)? How about BLIMPs? Bloated Lethargically Interacting Massive Particles
To: PatrickHenry
I've found no suggestion of a nearby wimpzilla source.You know, that's the way it always is. There's a niche market for something, and then suddenly it catches on and becomes a big fad. Then when the fad dies down, the old reliable wimpzilla purveyors are dragged down with it, and the serious consumers of wimpzillae have to drive to the next state just to get any. And of course the quality has gone way downhill.
To: Physicist
And of course the quality has gone way downhill. Ain't it the truth? Entropy just isn't what it used to be.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson