Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wimpzillas (particle 1000 billion times more massive than proton) leave tracks say astronomers
New Scientist ^ | 12:30 03 June 02 | Anil Ananthaswamy

Posted on 06/10/2002 11:17:08 AM PDT by dead

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Pinlighter
Rather a confused article, I think

You mean "Enrico Fermico" wasn't his real name?

21 posted on 06/10/2002 1:44:29 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
That was the name of the company he started. 8)
22 posted on 06/10/2002 1:49:28 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dead
I swear these guys sit around drinking coffe and making this stuff up!
23 posted on 06/10/2002 1:49:56 PM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'm beginning to think that the true "wimpzillas" are
the taxpayers who tolerate the funding of this crap.
24 posted on 06/10/2002 1:53:09 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
But we haven't imaged the sources of the distant cosmic rays. We just catch the strays; as far as we can tell, their distribution is isotropic. Using your argument, this means that the sources must be very distant, else we would have associated them with an obvious optical source, or at least detected some anisotropy.
25 posted on 06/10/2002 1:54:28 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dead
Cool - but the word sounds like the name of an open source browser or a MP3 player.

Download WIMPZILLA 1.0 now!

26 posted on 06/10/2002 1:58:41 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Could also be an drive-time afternoon Zoo disc jockey.
27 posted on 06/10/2002 2:18:44 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
There are 4 things this fat slob will never see 1. the correct side of any issue. 2. A limit to Big Brother powers in Wash.DC. And the other TWO are his feet!!
28 posted on 06/10/2002 2:43:33 PM PDT by GeorgeHL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
ALERT! ALERT! this is a picture of Nadzilla the monster who swallowed the Nations Capitol.
29 posted on 06/10/2002 2:45:41 PM PDT by GeorgeHL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dead
OK, scientists if you want to call God "Wimpzillas," I can live with that.
30 posted on 06/10/2002 3:18:01 PM PDT by 3catsanadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead;dighton;Orual;Lazamataz;Travis McGee;harpseal;Squantos;PatrickHenry
Wimpzillas (particle 1000 billion times more massive than proton) leave tracks say astronomers

And my wife JUST mopped the space-time continuum, dagnabit! Someone tell these Wimpzillas to wipe their feet!

31 posted on 06/10/2002 3:20:09 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"We need to send someone to see these Wimpzillas !"

If I'm chosen to go, I'll need at least a two week notice before departing.

32 posted on 06/10/2002 3:52:15 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
A Google search on "Wimpzilla" turns up 67 hits. I've scanned a few (not a great way to absorb such material) and in this very limited form of research I've found no suggestion of a nearby wimpzilla source. The consensus, if there is such a thing here, is that they may be products of the very early universe.
33 posted on 06/10/2002 3:55:42 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I've found no suggestion of a nearby wimpzilla source.

I took the "nearby source" comment to mean a nearby source for ultra high-energy cosmic rays (protons, gammas, what have you). The idea here is that the most energetic particles would be generated not by astrophysical sources, but by the (comparatively nearby) annihilation or decay of wimpzillas, which--having gigantic rest mass energies--impart huge kinetic energies to the daughter particles.

I'm still trying to figure out the argument against high-energy cosmic rays travelling long distances. Perhaps they would collide with CMBR photons, a sort of cosmic laser-cooling process. The wimpzillas themselves would be transparent to photons, and not be subject to this. Just a thought.

I sure hate the term "wimpzilla". It's as moronic as it is oxymoronic. How about a "Weakly interacting Horribly Obese Massive Particles" (WHOMPs)?

34 posted on 06/10/2002 4:31:04 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 3catsanadog
OK, scientists if you want to call God "Wimpzillas," I can live with that.

Just as long as you don't mind us calculating and measuring a complete description of His properties.

35 posted on 06/10/2002 4:33:55 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
A Google search on "Wimpzilla" turns up 67 hits.

Googlewhack fodder. I got one on my very first try: "wimpzilla chocolate".

36 posted on 06/10/2002 4:36:20 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
"wimpzilla chocolate"

"unmeasurable WHOMP"

37 posted on 06/10/2002 4:48:29 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
How about a "Weakly interacting Horribly Obese Massive Particles" (WHOMPs)?

How about BLIMPs? Bloated Lethargically Interacting Massive Particles

38 posted on 06/10/2002 5:30:30 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I've found no suggestion of a nearby wimpzilla source.

You know, that's the way it always is. There's a niche market for something, and then suddenly it catches on and becomes a big fad. Then when the fad dies down, the old reliable wimpzilla purveyors are dragged down with it, and the serious consumers of wimpzillae have to drive to the next state just to get any. And of course the quality has gone way downhill.

39 posted on 06/10/2002 5:37:38 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
And of course the quality has gone way downhill.

Ain't it the truth? Entropy just isn't what it used to be.

40 posted on 06/10/2002 5:47:53 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson