To: *landgrab; *Green; *Enviralists; farmfriend; marsh2; dixiechick2000; Mama_Bear; poet...
Almost twenty years for them to win what is constitutionally mandated, and the taxpayers get stuck paying more than twice due to the legal fees. (No. I don't begrudge the lawyers fees.)
Ping.
3 posted on
06/03/2002 4:56:07 PM PDT by
brityank
To: brityank
Late but good news ping!
To: brityank;all
All you folks who surf in here need to click on this:
landgrab:
To find all articles tagged or indexed using landgrab, click below: |
|
click here >>> |
landgrab |
<<< click here |
|
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
... to see just how much mischief has been "slipped in under your radar" while you weren't paying attention...
6 posted on
06/03/2002 5:13:03 PM PDT by
backhoe
To: brityank
Thanks for the ping. I haven't seen you here lately.
To: brityank
Evening Brityank, I'm happy with the outcome, but dumbfounded at the bizzarre stuff the federal government tries to get away with. Here's one for you: Washington State, large church buys land for new church (appropirately zoned), has been collecting money now the build the new church. The city council CONDEMS the LAND so they can sell it to Costco, because a church would be of "less" value to the people in the area and they don't like the church pushing people around. ????? Yes, true.
To: brityank
why won't the members of congress who passed such unconstitutional laws be held accountable and not the taxpayers??? is there someone i could call to get this done??? my congressman won't answer his phone.
13 posted on
06/03/2002 7:37:02 PM PDT by
teeman8r
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson