Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pg 1 of 7 >> Brattitude Adjustment (Flashback to 2000 and the eve of the "dot.com implosion")
Wired ^ | September 2000 | Warren St. John

Posted on 05/28/2002 6:53:05 PM PDT by SamAdams76

Edited on 06/29/2004 7:09:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

NOTE: This WIRED article is from September 2000 when the high-flying Razorfish was only just beginning to fall from grace. Once selling at $40 a share, the stock is now worth just pennies (21 cents per share at the closing bell today) and Razorfish is desperately seeking a "reverse split" that would keep them (or rather delay them) from being de-listed from NASDAQ.


(Excerpt) Read more at wired.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: arrogant; cocky; dotcommers; knowitall
This article pretty much sums up the "Dot.com" era.
1 posted on 05/28/2002 6:53:05 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Pretty much sounds like all my investments. Wonder if I could do better on the pony's?
2 posted on 05/28/2002 6:57:15 PM PDT by Joee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Remember when at the height of the dot.com era, there was a new,form of psycological problem, called "affluenza", the guilt of having too much money, from the dot.com bonanza. I remember Rush, going ballistic about it. I was doing the same basically. I remember one guy saying he was happier, living in a dank, dark studio apartment, than living in some fancy condo. I wonder how he is doing now?
3 posted on 05/28/2002 7:08:14 PM PDT by mlibertarianj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Sam, you cracked me up with this.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F -- member of the .mil generation...

4 posted on 05/28/2002 7:10:38 PM PDT by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlibertarianj
During the dot-com era, there was an even more serious form of a psychological problem called "financial idiocy." I heard it manifested a few times in callers to a financial talk-radio show who insisted to the host that from that day forward a company's earnings would no longer be a factor in its stock price.

"You heard it right there, folks," the host said (and you could almost see him shaking his head), "and you wonder why I am advising all of my listeners to cash out of this dot-com nonsense right now?"

5 posted on 05/28/2002 7:13:26 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I was telling everyone I knew to sell their tech stocks in August of 2000. That's when I got out, when the writing on the wall became ever so apparent.
6 posted on 05/28/2002 7:25:27 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mlibertarianj
Probably went bust and is living in a cheap studio apartment, thinking about how much he misses his fancy condo and wishing he weren't such an idiot.
7 posted on 05/28/2002 7:57:27 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Very entertaining history review of the Dotcom lunacy Sam, thanks for the post. By the way, theres a bit of irony here - whats Wired stock worth these days, 14 cents? Is it traded over the drug store counter now? lol....
8 posted on 05/28/2002 8:13:28 PM PDT by Enlightiator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson