Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NICKLES CRITICIZES CLINTON ATTACKS
The Sunday Oklahoman ^ | 26 May 2002 | Chris Casteel

Posted on 05/28/2002 6:00:45 PM PDT by PhiKapMom

Nickles criticizes Clinton on attacks

2002-05-26
By Chris Casteel
The Oklahoman

WASHINGTON -- Any investigation of the Bush administration's response to terrorist threats should include an examination of the attacks launched against the United States during Bill Clinton's presidency, Sen. Don Nickles said.

Nickles, R-Ponca City, said he was "furious" when Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton recently gave a speech on the Senate floor and quoted a New York City tabloid questioning what President Bush knew before Sept. 11 about possible terrorist activity.

"I just thought it was very inappropriate," Nickles, the assistant Republican leader, said last week.

The United States was attacked several times during Clinton's presidency, he said, and despite strong rhetoric in the aftermath of the attacks, "we didn't do anything about it."

In some cases, such as attacks on the USS Cole and Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, the United States military was attacked directly. In others, such as the 1998 attacks on embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, hundreds of people working for the U.S. government were killed, he said.

Some lawmakers are calling for a special commission to study the intelligence gathering and processing preceding Sept. 11. That would be in addition to the congressional inquiry already under way.

Nickles said, "If we're going to have an investigation, we should have an investigation of why we didn't respond strongly to previous acts of terror.

"I'm pretty critical of the previous administration. They dropped the ball in the war on terrorism. They never engaged in the war on terrorism."

Nickles has prepared charts listing five terrorist attacks on the United States during the Clinton administration, not counting the Oklahoma City bombing, and showing the strong comments made by Clinton afterward. Nickles said those comments were never followed by effective action.

In an interview in his Capitol office, Nickles also said:

The past year has been frustrating since Vermont Sen. Jim Jeffords quit the Republican Party, giving control to Democrats.

Nickles has "decided not to decide" for now whether he will run for a fifth term in 2004 or whether he will run for Republican leader in the Senate.

The nation is doing more to protect itself after Sept. 11, but that the open nature of the United States means "we're always somewhat susceptible to some type of terrorist activity."

He wanted the president to veto the farm bill, which he called "socialistic," and force the next Congress to rewrite it with a more market-oriented approach. Bush signed the bill.

Nickles, 53, is the longest- serving and most influential member of Oklahoma's mostly Republican congressional delegation. He has been the second- ranking Republican leader in the Senate since 1996, but can't run again for the job as GOP whip because of a caucus term- limit rule.

For most of the time Nickles has been in the No. 2 job, Republicans were in the majority. That changed in May 2001 when Jeffords switched from a Republican to an independent aligned with Democrats.

In the past few months, Nickles has repeatedly expressed his frustration with the way the Senate was being run. He complained repeatedly during debate on the energy bill that Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle had bypassed the Energy Committee, which was ready to approve drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

"I'm very frustrated with the way the Senate is being managed by the Democrats," Nickles said. "The Senate is not the Senate I know and love and could and should be.

"I have great respect for this institution. Unfortunately, I think Tom Daschle and the Democrats are denigrating the institution."

Nickles also expressed some frustration with the White House, particularly some of the policy advisers.

"I think the administration was not well-served by some of their advisers early on, on both campaign finance (legislation) and the farm bill, when they pretty much sent signals that the president would sign whatever Congress passed.

"And I urged the administration to modify that position on trade, on budget bills, on appropriations and so on ... the defense bill. Always urge that we pass a good bill. But never say you'll sign any bill.

Nickles said the status of Republicans in the Senate, whether or not they're in the majority, will be a factor in his decision about future campaigns.

"I may not" run again, he said. "I don't know for sure. It kind of depends what the status is in the Senate. I'll take a look at it then.

"I basically decided not to decide for awhile. Why try to decide now?"

Nickles said he would announce at least a year in advance, which would be November 2003, whether he is running for another term to give potential candidates enough time to organize.

Sen. Don Nickles: Second-ranking Senate Re~publican since 1996.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: clintonsinaction; daschle; democrats; denigratingsenate; terroristattacks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Checked to see if this article about Sen Nickles from Oklahoma was posted over the weekend and holiday and couldn't find it! The bolded material is mine!
1 posted on 05/28/2002 6:00:46 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Howlin; Deport
FYI!
2 posted on 05/28/2002 6:01:56 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I'm sure we will hear much from the "BITCH OF THE BRONX!"
3 posted on 05/28/2002 6:04:23 PM PDT by Joee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joee
Undfortunately I believe you are right! Don't think she is EVER going to shut-up and go away!
4 posted on 05/28/2002 6:08:27 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OK Sooner; VOA; Ole Okie; Osage Orange
Thought you would enjoy reading this one!
5 posted on 05/28/2002 6:09:27 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
"I have great respect for this institution. Unfortunately, I think Tom Daschle and the Democrats are denigrating the institution."

Nickles better be careful. He's liable to be accused of racism for this quote.

6 posted on 05/28/2002 6:13:36 PM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Undfortunately I believe you are right! Don't think she is EVER going to shut-up and go away!

Every thing she does or says is very calculated...for her run for the Presidency. I'm betting 2004. J Edwards and T Daschle have already suffered foot-in-mouth; D Gephardt is too stiff and unexciting; A Gore is a has-been. HillC is currently working behind the scenes to build up her coalition, re-energize the old Clinton machine, and discredit her Democrat competition.
7 posted on 05/28/2002 6:16:30 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
Can you explain why you think Senator Nickles quote could be considered racism? Denigrating means to defame or belittle which seems to fit what the DemocRATS and daschle are doing to the Senate!
8 posted on 05/28/2002 6:20:00 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Thanks for the ping.

Don sounds frustrated, but he's sure right about Daschle and the Dumbs.

9 posted on 05/28/2002 6:23:42 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I would like to see Nickles replace Lott.Him or Jon Kyle...or some other member of a vertabrate species.
10 posted on 05/28/2002 6:24:21 PM PDT by Dutchgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
If she doesn't get it together for 2004, expect her to run for sure in 2008! Believe they will rerun Gore in 2004 as a throw-away candidate from everything that is out there. I don't think she wants to go against Pres Bush so I predict 2008! Look to see more clintonites run for office in 2004/2006 to try and build up her base in the States which makes defeating the clintonites that are running a priority!

BTW -- if Sen Nickles decides not to run in 2004, I predict that Cong J.C. Watts (R-OK) will be the next Senator from Oklahoma!

11 posted on 05/28/2002 6:25:04 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl
Rumor has it that Nickles is going to challenge Lott for Majority Leader!
12 posted on 05/28/2002 6:25:39 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
Having listened to him in interviews, I would agree that he is very frustrated and downright mad!
13 posted on 05/28/2002 6:28:27 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Great post, but if one were to read only the headline one might think that Sen. Nickles was criticizing us for attacking Clinton (forgot that on between Clinton and attacks). (^:
The press is spending its time digging through President Bush's trash can and neglecting.....

A List of the Democrat Morons who are blasting Bush and how they voted for Intelligence Budget Cuts


Clainton Balked at Sudan offer to Arrest bin Laden:
MORE EVIDENCE OF CLINTON'S FAILURE: Fascinating report in the left-wing British paper, the Observer, about the extent of the Clinton administration's responsibility for hobbling our intelligence operations in the last ten years. Vast files of intelligence from Sudan, specifically about Osama bin Laden, were simply ignored or spurned by Clinton officials. According to the Observer, "One senior CIA source admitted last night: 'This represents the worst single intelligence failure in this whole terrible business. It is the key to the whole thing right now. It is reasonable to say that had we had this data we may have had a better chance of preventing the attacks.' He said the blame for the failure lay in the 'irrational hatred' the Clinton administration felt for the source of the proffered intelligence - Sudan, where bin Laden and his leading followers were based from 1992-96. He added that after a slow thaw in relations which began last year, it was only now that the Sudanese information was being properly examined for the first time." Quick, Sandy. Better leak something to the New York Times to spin this one away.

30 posted on 10/3/01 7:58 AM Eastern by aristeides


Clinton CYAing
Get Ready for 20 WTC Bombings, detailed Emerson piece on Muslim militants in America, 1997.
Terrorist Push Plots from American Jail, Ramsey Clark's client, key figure in Osama's terrorist network, issued fatwa, support for strikes against Americans from jail...1998:
That move was made, in part, because of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, the blind spiritual leader of Egypt's largest terrorist organization who was sentenced to life in prison for several violent plots, according to Justice Department sources.

Rahman allegedly has issued several statements from prison despite scrutiny by authorities. They included two last summer in which he withdrew support for his terrorist group's cease-fire in Egypt.

According to court testimony, Rahman, who also is a key figure for Osama bin Laden's terrorist network, issued a fatwa, or holy decree, from prison approving strikes against Americans. The decree reportedly was given to an Al Qaeda member training at a camp in Afghanistan in late 1998......

.....Sixteen days into the sentence, his defense lawyer, former U.S. Atty. Gen. Ramsey Clark, pressed the warden to grant Rahman broad freedoms, citing Rahman's status as an international Muslim leader. In a letter dated Feb. 2, 1996, Clark wrote Warden Patrick Keohane that Rahman should be allowed to communicate with his followers worldwide via direct conversations with "Islamic scholars, mosques and Muslim leaders."

The request was rejected, though Rahman still had some telephone privileges, records show.

In the months that followed, Rahman allegedly abused those privileges by calling people with whom he was allowed to speak only to have them patch the calls to others, records show.

14 posted on 05/28/2002 6:28:40 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Senator Nickles is right on target. Glad he said what urgently needed to be said. We cannot investigate just one man who inherited one hell of a big mess after Clinton finally left office.
15 posted on 05/28/2002 6:30:21 PM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Can you explain why you think Senator Nickles quote could be considered racism? Denigrating means to defame or belittle which seems to fit what the DemocRATS and daschle are doing to the Senate!

Washington career ended for saying 'niggardly'

Electronic Telegraph

Thursday 28 January 1999 Hugo Gurdon

A GOVERNMENT employee in Washington has been forced from office because he used the word "niggardly", which colleagues wrongly presumed was a variant of "nigger".

David Howard, director of the District of Columbia's constituent services office, who is white, told staff he was niggardly over his administration of a fund. When he realised two black staff were offended he apologised, but his head had to roll.

Word spread that Mr Howard had said "nigger" and the rumour mill did not stop until it had wrecked his career. He said: "I would never think of making a racist remark. I regret that the word I did use offended anyone." The word "niggardly" comes from the Middle English nig, meaning miser; "nigger" comes from the Latin niger, meaning black.

Nevertheless, Mr Howard agrees that his chosen locution undermined his ability to work within the DC government, particularly at a time when the new mayor, Anthony Williams, is under assault from critics for a failure of "loyalty" to his race, who form the majority of citizens in the capital. The Washington Post recently published an article wondering whether Mr Williams was "black enough".

16 posted on 05/28/2002 6:32:47 PM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl
I would like to see Nickles replace Lott.Him or Jon Kyle...or some other member of a vertabrate species.

He's going to wait and see how the water feels by stinking his toe in at a later date.........

Nickles said the status of Republicans in the Senate, whether or not they're in the majority, will be a factor in his decision about future campaigns.

"I may not" run again, he said. "I don't know for sure. It kind of depends what the status is in the Senate. I'll take a look at it then.

17 posted on 05/28/2002 6:32:55 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
My feelings about our response to September 11th's terrorist attacks is pride that the United States reacted as quickly as we did. All air traffic was shut down right away which I am sure spoiled a few (or maybe several) other little surprises that the terrorists had planned for us that day.
18 posted on 05/28/2002 6:35:39 PM PDT by mtngrl@vrwc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Thanks again. I hope he "decides to decide".
19 posted on 05/28/2002 6:51:55 PM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: harpo11
I was very happy when I saw the front page of The Sunday Oklahoman with this article from Senator Nickles. It's about time ms. clinton was really called on her remarks!
20 posted on 05/28/2002 6:58:06 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson