Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Balto_Boy
"Do these instruments use different methods or the same, and do any of them test actual samples?"

Remote spectroscopy is just as valid as taking samples.

"I would agree, except the findings are being reported along side a call to go to Mars. Not that I'm opposed to exploration, but let's do it for the right reasons, IE. to see what's there, not to pour money into trying to prove the theory of life on Mars."

The major SHORT-TERM importance of the findings means that any exploration can be done far less expensively (fuel for the return trip can be generated on-site instead of having to be carried along, as well as the oxygen needed for the stay). Longer-term, the presence of water means that colonization is possible.

23 posted on 05/27/2002 10:21:30 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
Not that I'm opposed to exploration, but let's do it for the right reasons, IE. to see what's there, not to pour money into trying to prove the theory of life on Mars."

Not that I'm opposed to eating, but let's do it for the right reasons, IE. to keep our bodies alive, not to waste money trying to enjoy the taste of the food.
32 posted on 05/27/2002 10:43:34 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson