Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open up the can of worms...
The Ludwig von Mises Institute ^ | May 26, 2001 | Lawrence Reed

Posted on 05/16/2002 8:31:11 PM PDT by danielmryan

The Real Crime of Pearl Harbor

by Lawrence Reed

[May 26, 2001]

In casting for the almost three-hour epic, "Pearl Harbor," Hollywood forgot seventeen-year-old Lawrence McCutcheon, a U.S. Navy seaman from Gridley, California.  No character in the movie portrays McCutcheon, the first of 2,476 Americans killed on that fateful day, December 7, 1941.  

The young patriot was serving his country high up in the foremast of the battleship Maryland when the first of hundreds of Japanese planes began machine gunning the men on the decks of American vessels lined up like sitting ducks.

Leaving heroes like McCutcheon to the footnotes of the history books, to  make room for airheads such as Alec Baldwin and Ben Affleck to strut their stuff, is par for the course in Hollywood these days.  

That';s not by a long shot the most offensive element of Jerry Bruckheimer's "Pearl Harbor."  The sappy, drawn-out love story that almost begs for Japanese intervention isn't the primary faux pas either.  No, the real crime of this film is the preposterous portrayal of the American commander-in-chief, the man every statist lives to cover up for: Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

FDR (played by John Voight because Barbara Streisand was too busy banging out deep treatises in political theory) sits at the left hand of God in this movie.  Surprised and stunned by the Japanese attack, he summons the righteous indignation of a wounded nation.  From his wheelchair, he stands tall and strong, inspiring even reluctant military men to do their duty. What a hero!  Rumor has it that Bruckheimer cried when advised that the movie was already too long to include the scene where FDR wins a fifth term.

Anyone afflicted by watching this historical poison should rush out immediately and get the antidote in the form of Robert B. Stinnett's blockbuster book, Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor. Judged by the Chicago Sun-Times' Tom Roeser as "perhaps the most revelatory document of our time," the Stinnett book appeared in hard cover last year and in paperback just in time for the movie.  Drawing on a wealth of previously classified material, the author proves beyond all doubt that FDR could not possibly have been surprised by what the Japanese did or where and when they did it.  

For at least a year before the attack, FDR pursued a policy of goading the Japanese to do it.  He saw no other way to overwhelm American isolationist sentiment and get the country to enter the war against the Axis powers. 

For key command posts, he carefully picked and placed naval officers who would not obstruct his provocation plans.  Vice-Admiral James O. Richardson, commander-in-chief of the United States Fleet, strenuously objected to White House orders to bottle up the main elements of our Pacific navy in one place, Pearl Harbor.  He was sacked.  To fill Richardson's place, FDR vaulted Admiral Husband Kimmel over 32 others.  Kimmel was a decent man and no stooge, but the White House systematically denied him information that the Japanese were targeting Hawaii.

Indeed, on his own initiative in late November 1941, Kimmel dispatched a portion of the fleet to the sea north of Hawaii where he suspected a gathering of Japanese carriers.  It turned out to be the staging area of the ultimate assault on Pearl Harbor, but Kimmel was stopped short of confirming that by strange orders from the White House to get his ships back to Oahu.

There's a scene in the movie where Kimmel receives a cable from Washington, well after the attack had started, that hostilities with Japan were imminent.  He tosses the untimely scrap of paper to the ground.  No mention is made of what Stinnett proves: "By the closing months of 1941, America was intercepting and breaking - within a matter of hours - most every code that Japan could produce."  

No less than seven Japanese naval broadcasts intercepted between November 28 and December 6 confirmed that Japan was planning to wipe out the bulk of America's Pacific fleet ensconced at Pearl Harbor, but Kimmel was kept completely and deliberately in the dark.  He was later the designated fall guy for the whole debacle, when the treacherous FDR relieved him of his command and demoted him unceremoniously to rear admiral.  

The film shows an utterly flabbergasted FDR muttering upon hearing the first report of the attack, "My God.  An entire fleet at anchor!"  Perhaps at that critical moment FDR betrayed no foreknowledge when an aide brought him the news, but the indisputable record as presented by Stinnett shows that it could only have been an example of good acting.

To be sure, the pyrotechnics in the movie are superb.  Hollywood really knows how to blow things up, whether it be bombs doing it to battleships or a script accomplishing the same thing to historical fact.  

Perhaps the most interesting utterance from John Voight's FDR is this line: "Now I wonder every hour of my life why God put me in this chair."  Read Robert Stinnett';s Day of Deceit and you'll wonder the same thing, but for very devastatingly different reasons.  The attack of December 7, 1941 is not the only thing that should live in infamy.  The character and behavior of the man "Pearl Harbor" deifies is another.

-------------- 

Lawrence W. Reed, an adjunct scholar of the Mises Institute, is president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy in Midland, Michigan. See his Daily Article Archive and send him mail



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; intelligencefailure; roosevelt; waggingthedog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
If the above is a little too much for you, then let me kindly direct you towards the Heinlein booth. His characterization of the Pearl Harbor attack can be summed up in this quote: "Intelligence reports are useful only to the intelligent"

Whether this applies to the Administration of 2001 or the Administration of 1941, or both or neither, is up to you.

- Dan the Errand Boy

1 posted on 05/16/2002 8:31:12 PM PDT by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
Good post, but please use the original title. When you get creative with the title, it greatly increases the chances of a repeat post, since a title search yields nothing even though the article is already posted.
2 posted on 05/16/2002 8:39:09 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
I not sure if I Grok this or not....
3 posted on 05/16/2002 8:39:24 PM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
Open up the can of worms...

I was thinking more of a crock of s---.

4 posted on 05/16/2002 8:39:57 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
All right. I suppose this could be excused because the original article was published almost a year ago, and is one I had to search through the Mises Site for.

But I'll certainly remember for the future.

5 posted on 05/16/2002 8:46:42 PM PDT by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Here's something you can grok:

If it had not been for the "long-hairs," both President Bushs' approval ratings during the respective conflicts they Commanded-In-Chiefed would have been cemented into something far more permanent.

Especially the current President Bush.

"To wi-i-i-n...the unwinnable wa-a-a-r..."

6 posted on 05/16/2002 9:05:44 PM PDT by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
Can't buy this. I'm no fan of Roosevelt, but I'd like to bring up a few points

1) The Japanese code most penetrated prior to the war was the diplomatic code (called Purple), not the naval code. Thus we read the Japanese ultimatum sent to Wahington before before it was presented to the State Dept, but no way were we "reading 90% of Japanese naval messages within hours of transmission in 1941" as quoted in a review at the amazon.com link. I doubt that level of penetration was acheived even in 1945.

2) Every Japanese source I ever read all say strict radio silence was maintained to the point of removing crystals from transmitters. They knew it would have suicidal to transmit any signals that could give away their location.

3) The war Roosevelt wanted was with Germany, not Japan. The Axis was not a formal alliance as we think of it. There was no guarentee Hitler would declear war on us in support of Japan, and in fact he did not until 11 Dec. War with Germany could probably have have brought about just using U.S. merchants to ship Lend Lease material to Britain and letting German subs sink enough to rouse public anger.

4) If we knew the Japanese were coming and when, why not just change our search plane patterns and "discover" them just prior to launch? I think most Americans would have recognized the presense of a Japanese carrier force in our home waters as an act of war. In others words, if we wanted war, there other ways to go without allowing the destruction of the fleet.

5) Roosevelt could not have pulled anything like this off without help from the military itself, and I refuse to believe they would have complied.

The only thing I agree on with this author is that "Pearl Harbor" was a really terrible movie.

7 posted on 05/16/2002 9:31:38 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
The code most penetrated was the diplomatic code, not the naval code...

Sorry, both the diplomatic codes (purple) and the naval (JN-25) were totally compromised to the US. Our interception of Japanese naval traffic, in compromised Japanese naval code resulted in some telling achievements, such as the victory at Midway, and the (and it cannot be put otherwise) assassination of Admiral of the Combined Japanese Fleet Isoruku Yamamoto. Both these happened well before 1945, or even 1944 for that matter (Midway was in 1942, and the assassination in 1943, I believe...)

the infowarrior

8 posted on 05/17/2002 12:40:19 AM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY, infowarrior
You're certainly entitled to your opinion, sirs; all viewpoints concerning this issue are, from my perspective, valid ones. Let the debate be free as air; marshal your facts as ye may; let the free and open exchange of ideas bring ye to an acceptable conclusion.

Do ye want to know why I speak with such words? Simple: I'm a Canadian. Not involved one way or the other.

- Cheers!

9 posted on 05/17/2002 2:43:25 AM PDT by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
As you saw from my post, my facts were already marshaled. (additional fact, I saw a History Channel segment on the Yamamoto assassination just last night. This provided me with the data of the name WE used for the compromised Japanese Imperial Navy code, that being JN-25).

The IJN had updated that same code circa early 1943, suspecting we may have cracked a portion of it, after their debacle at Midway. Fortune, or if you will, Divine Providence intervened when a New Zealand destroyer attacked and destroyed a Japanese submarine in the waters near Guadalcanal (by ramming it, no less!) Part of the debris that surfaced was a copy of the updated cyphers for the JN-25 code which had been previously compromised. The Allies, after this stroke of fortune, had it all....

the infowarrior

10 posted on 05/17/2002 3:04:39 AM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior
Interesting. I have to admit that this isn't one of the areas in which I can claim to be knowledgable.

By the way: if you guys want to dig through some alternate interpretations of Canadian history, feel free. Lord know us Canucks have weighed in on your events.

11 posted on 05/17/2002 3:09:20 AM PDT by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
Several years ago Sixty Minutes had a segment on some Airmen who were stationed in China and prepped to make a first strike on Japan. Those men had remained silent for fifty years about their classified mission but, once speaking, were indicating that the U.S. intended to "Pearl Harbor" Japan.

Never heard any more about that.

12 posted on 05/17/2002 3:13:35 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
For at least a year before the attack, FDR pursued a policy of goading the Japanese to do it. He saw no other way to overwhelm American isolationist sentiment and get the country to enter the war against the Axis powers.

Most students of history are not aware that months before Pearl Harbor, American pilots were flying combat missions against the Japanese in China. US officers were "released" from the US military, and "volunteered" to join the Nationalist Chinese forces to fight the Japanese. They were called the "Flying Tigers". One pilot's memoirs of the days is "God is my Co-Pilot" by Robert Lee Scott.

13 posted on 05/17/2002 3:23:20 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan;all
Pearl! Dec. 7, 1941- what really happened?
14 posted on 05/17/2002 3:23:58 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
"Indeed, on his own initiative in late November 1941, Kimmel dispatched a portion of the fleet to the sea north of Hawaii where he suspected a gathering of Japanese carriers. It turned out to be the staging area of the ultimate assault on Pearl Harbor, but Kimmel was stopped short of confirming that by strange orders from the White House to get his ships back to Oahu." When I read this book, this particular chapter caused me to literally drop it on the floor.

Kimmel had the fleet out! In spite of everything Roosevelt did to deny him necessary intelligence, Kimmels training and native intelligence told him something was up and he got his fleet to sea. Roosevelt, ordering him back into Pearl Harbor is the final proof for me.

Regards,

15 posted on 05/17/2002 3:36:30 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
You might want to give this book a read. It is put together from FOIA secured material.

As to radio signals, there were intercepts of the Japanese warships calling up oilers for refueling, fleet maintenace signals that were intercepted.

Roosevelt arranged the Pearl Harbor attack as surely as Yammamoto. What he did not anticipate, is that the Japanese would do such a fine job.

Regards.

16 posted on 05/17/2002 3:41:04 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson