Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't practice criminal law but this judge is an idiot. Of course law enforcement use coercion to pressure suspects into revealing incriminating information, but the right not to incriminate one's self isn't absolute. Clues and evidence left behind by criminals are essentially forms of self-incrimination. The right against self-incrimination is essentially a right against torture. If the suspect is too stupid to realize that the option of signing a consent form for a search bears a right of refusal, too bad for him. Are we going to force law enforcement to bring lawyers along to inform suspects of how to evade the law now?
1 posted on 04/30/2002 1:35:08 PM PDT by pragmatic_asian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pragmatic_asian
Already posted HERE
2 posted on 04/30/2002 1:47:19 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pragmatic_asian
Agents failed to tell Awadallah he had a constitutional right to refuse any searches when they asked him to sign a form consenting to a search, the judge said.

Where in the constitution does it say that all of the citizen's privileges extend to foreigers?

3 posted on 04/30/2002 2:02:25 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pragmatic_asian
Clinton appointee, Cornell Law grad.
5 posted on 05/01/2002 6:06:44 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson