Posted on 04/18/2002 6:16:08 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
Ally McBeal is gone, cancelled, a half-decade memory of a soured relationship.
Two funny seasons were followed by three not-so-funny ones. And Christina Ricci and Matthew Perry could not keep Mondays episode from pulling in the shows lowest 18-49 demo ever.
Creator David E. Kelley hasn't yet penned the series finale, which airs May 20
nah...
(The amount of ABSOLUTE trash there is on even the BROADCAST networks is indicitive of a very vast divide between the "media hubs" in this nation [New York and Los Angeles, mostly] and "flyover country"... When will the REAL America stand up and demand that trash like this be taken off the air? Will we ever?)
Heck, I'm not _that_ old, but I don't remember shows (in the 80's) being ANYWHERE near as bad as the trash we've got on ALL shows (the language is bad enough without the incessant sexual innuendo) these days. Hell, I can barely watch "Greg the Bunny" without getting the urge to change the channel.
It's sick. Someone NEEDS to start a national network, based outside of "flyto" land, so we can have something to watch...
:) ttt
And what you in "real America" consider "smut" I may like. A few examples are NYPD Blue" (something "Real America" protested like crazy 9 years ago), "The Simpsons", "The Shield", and "The Osbournes".
What you may not realize, or like, is that "real America" has lots of people who like these shows. "Smut" is in the eye of the beholder - but if you look at it objectively, few shows that offer nothing but "smut" last. You have to have good writing and compelling storylines to do something besides just fade away after the initital shock.
And when comparing television fare of today to that of the 80's there are vast differences which can be found without considering levels of "smut." Linguistically, the characters in many new television shows use coarse language ("kick your ass", etc), the storylines revolve around sex sex sex, all conservatives are shown in a negative light. These are the kind of thing that I have a problem with.
I'm not saying that all of this programming should be banned or anything rediculous like that. I just find it hard to believe that anyone outside of New York and LA watches this crap.
(My biggest objection to "shock" programming is that it is always aired at a time when parents watch television with their children (6 pm - 9 pm). I have no problems whatsoever with airing more coarse programming beyond this time (I personally enjoy watching "Just Shoot Me" on occasion, and while I find some of the storylines distasteful, I've got no intentions of allowing my children to watch it for a good while, due to the nature of most of the storylines).
I'm not demanding that "coarse" programming go away. I'm begging for more "wholesome" programming.
Good storylines don't require sexual innuendo nor foul language.
:) ttt
Maybe when they stop watching Jerry Springer, et al.
Tuor
Will Sex in the City be next? The 90s truly are over, my friend.
I thought it went off after the first episode.
Maybe when they stop watching Jerry Springer, et al.
Tuor
Touche, Tuor! The same people who made Hee Haw a syndicated favorite all these years are many of the same people who watch Springer.
Personally, I H8 Rosie O'Donut and Katie Couric, but if you want to watch them, go ahead. Its your brain to numb.
Wow, I didn't realize that was pee-wee. Anyway, Ally McBeal was just a bad show. All they did to keep people watching was to try to have a celebrity guest every show.
I absolutlely think there is a big demand for "wholesome" programming. However, there is one reason it will never make as much money than "adult" programming - Demographics. The group with the most disposable income is the 18-34 year olds, who for the most part go for adult programming. When they mature and start having kids to worry about they care more about what's on TV and look for lighter fare, but because they have kids, other responsibilites, and start caring more about saving moeny for retirement than on the latest gadgets they don't have the same level of disposable income and are not as attracted to advertisers.
I call it Ally McBoring.
You got it! My parents (who are in their 50s) always complain about how all the shows on television are geared toward my age group (I'm about to turn 26). I simply shoot back that its a small price to pay for the fact that the boomers control everything else.
Funny thing is, the only show I watch with them when I visit is The Sopranos.
Me, I'll stick with the HBO shows (Sex and the City excluded, as I am a prig)and reruns of Seinfeld and All in the Family.
Hell, I found Brian Lamb more appealing that Calista Flockheart.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.