Replies

But Sacramento attorney Jeanne Vance, who is expecting her first child and is on waiting lists at four child-care centers, said she trusts the system.
"I presume the laws are set up in such a way that anyone who would endanger children, or would be called into question, would be weeded out," Vance said. "I don't know that I necessarily want to weed through all the rest of this stuff."

This MTB has read all the "PC" weed books, and stocked up on plenty of Campbell's Canned Liberal Motherhood.

One of the things I don't understand. If I am an alcoholic, and have killed 'x' people due to my drunk driving ... and I serve my time; I may live next door to you, and you are not made aware of my past(unless I chose to disclose it). If I have a burgulary record, rape, wife-beating, car theft, vandalism, forgery, kidnapping, extortion, counterfieting, drug smuggling, car theft, shoplifting (ad nauseum) and have served my time .... no one will alert the neighborhod of my background, should I move next door.

But, if I had sex with a minor, the neighborhood will be alerted, despite the fact that I have served my time. The punishment is unending. What's more, there have been incidents in LA where innocent people have been beaten and killed because they lived where a child-molester 'used to' live ... and the police records were not up-to-date.

I am not a child molester, have not done so, and will not do so in the future. But I do take issue with publishing crimes that may be decades old. Either kill the vermin, or set him free. I prefer to death, personally ... but the point remains that 'he paid his debt'.

"I think what we're going to see happening is a whole lot of people resigning as opposed to being humiliated," said Vicars.

All the more reason to inform the parents. This is much like the scandal going on in the Church now ---covering up past crimes of people who are working around kids. Time for the Church and the Society to stop protecting criminals.