WHO PUT CORETTA ON THE JURY?

boortz.com | February 25, 2002 | Neal Boortz

[NC Conservative]

She hasn’t attended one single day of the trial. She hasn’t read one deposition. She hasn’t asked the Fulton County District Attorney any questions regarding the case … but suddenly Coretta Scott King is interest in the murder trial of H. Jamil Rap Abdulla Yadda Brown Yadda Al-Amin.

Coretta says that all of the inconsistencies brought forth at the trial should be “explored and fully investigated.” So, there you have it folks. It’s “Coretta’s Rule.” Anytime different witnesses bring forth conflicting testimony at a trial all trial proceedings should halt so that the inconsistencies in the testimony can be fully investigated. Or – Instead of Coretta’s Rule, we could just go with state law – and the way things have been done in criminal trials for hundreds of years. We could just let the jury listen to the testimony, judge the truthfulness of the witnesses, and draw their own conclusions.

Oh … and we have another new rule from The Queen. Before you can convict someone of murder you have to prove a motive. She says that “a clear and unequivocal motive must be established for the verdict to have the credibility needed for closure.” So --- under this rule from Coretta you can have a man brutally murder another man in front of 1,500 witnesses --- but unless you establish a motive for the murder you should let the guy go. Hey, Coretta. How’s this for a motive? He didn’t want to be arrested!

Interestingly enough, Coretta’s statement was not released through the usual King Center channels. Instead, it was released by a spokesman for an Islamic group that has been steadfast in its defense of Al-Amin.

[Broward Lion]

Just another racist.

[rbmillerjr]

bump for liberal multicultural logic....it was said and thus it is.

[goodnesswins]

Typical yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda

[goodnesswins]

Typical yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda

[Map Kernow]

Just another racist.

She sure is...

[Chuck N]

Wasn't it amazing how during King Clinton's reign, he was able to pay Coretta King and her family off with hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars for Dr. King's so called letters? So they could continue to live like royalty and always be there to bash Republicans. For that much in pay off loot, wouldn't you bash Republicans too? Ha What a hoot! This world is gone crazy! They couldn't have paid me to take his papers, anything Dr. King wrote was written in books, why did they have to pay them all those millions? I'll tell you why...pay off, payohlah, moolah for rip offs. She's looney and her sons an absolute imbecile.

[Chad Fairbanks]

Translation: "My famous husband suffered a head wound, so that means I am an expert on everything..."

[Houmatt]

So how come nobody has had the cojones to just tell this mealy mouthed bleep to SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!?!

[AmishDude]

This puts the good Dr. King in a different light. Is it cheating if your wife is a vegetable? Or at least has the IQ of one?

[Mamzelle]

I don't think they've actually seen that money yet. Seem to remember reading that they upped the ante on the price tag to the Library of Congress or the National Archives, and they put a delay on the transaction, or at least on a 20 million transaction.

Fascinating, the Dreamland hustle. Wish I could have a look at the Mansion of Kings...is it in Atlanta?