Last month, my friend and I flew to Frankfort from Chicago. Sitting next to my friend was a 19 year old Albania man, with a Slovinian passport. He had flown to Chicago to visit his sister without a Visa. He said he had done it twice before with no trouble. Well this time big trouble ensued. He was held over night by INS and then put aboard the plane in handcuffs (which were removed for the flight. At Frankfort he was taken offr the plane by military or police (handcuffed) before other passengers were allowed off.
This is just the way it has to be now.
Or preferably deported. If that's all they've got on him, it's enough.
the NRA and the ACLU will be right on the case.
An immigration violation was apparently the crime he was held for; and now, something's probably come up that makes it necessary to keep his whereabouts unknown == perhaps, even, for his own protection.
Justified.
I think a constitutional amendment is absolutely necessary to clarify this.
The notion that Constitutional "Rights" accrue to terrorists illegally in this country is so beyond the pale that it would have been thought ridiculous to our founding fathers to address an absurd non-problem.
Well, that is precisely where we are.
And children born of foreign nationals illegaly or temporarily in this country are likewise illegal.
I really believe that this one issue will control the next presidential or congressional elections. The mood is getting uglier and firmer on this issue with the overwhelming number of Americans.
That said, I am uncomfortable with the idea of scarfing someone up to an "undisclosed" location without being able to talk to anyone for weeks. You also have to be disturbed by the fact that a judges are considering someone a "threat to the community" for possesing a hunting rifle.
Somebody change my mind on this.
Looks like the patsy's (us) the terrorists were used to dealing with have all gone away.
Let's see. What do we have here?
1. Haddad is evidently not an American citizen.
2. Moreover, he was obviously found in violation of his immigration/visa status.
3. Finally, he appears to be credibly linked to a suspected terrorist organization.
Now, of all times, is not a good time to be a non-citizen in America -- if you are found in violation of an immigration statute. And, especially, if you co-founded an organization suspected of raising money for terrorism.
The Constitution guarantees many things to Americans. The guarantees to non-citizens are largely reliant on our good faith -- which is somewhat strained right now.
A federal judge is issuing the orders as things progress here. These judges are not necerssarily known as lapdogs for the federal law enforcement agencies.
"Global Relief Foundation" is a terrorist front.
This guy broke the law.
Would anyone be whining if this guy was a mafia don? I claim terrorists are worse. At least the mafia tries to kill only other crooks.
As far as character assination is concerned, this story wouldn't have apeared in the press if the attorney wasn't making such a big stink to the press. I can't say I blame the attorney, but he is the one drumming up the publicity.
Goof grief, Charlie Brown. An assault squirrel gun?
Maybe they found something connecting him with the terrorists in some of the new information (videos, papers, etc.) they found in Afghanistan.